Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-253-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-253-2024
Research article
 | 
29 Jan 2024
Research article |  | 29 Jan 2024

The wind farm pressure field

Ronald B. Smith

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
TOSCA – an open-source, finite-volume, large-eddy simulation (LES) environment for wind farm flows
Sebastiano Stipa, Arjun Ajay, Dries Allaerts, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 297–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-297-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantitative comparison of power production and power quality onshore and offshore: a case study from the eastern United States
Rebecca Foody, Jacob Coburn, Jeanie A. Aird, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, and Sara C. Pryor
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 263–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Offshore low-level jet observations and model representation using lidar buoy data off the California coast
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, William I. Gustafson Jr., Ye Liu, Brian J. Gaudet, Nicola Bodini, Rob K. Newsom, and Mikhail Pekour
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-152,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-152, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Realistic turbulent inflow conditions for estimating the performance of a floating wind turbine
Cédric Raibaudo, Jean-Christophe Gilloteaux, and Laurent Perret
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1711–1725, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1711-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1711-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of wind farm parameterizations in the WRF model under different atmospheric stability conditions with high-resolution wake simulations
Oscar García-Santiago, Andrea N. Hahmann, Jake Badger, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-124,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-124, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary

Cited articles

Akhtar, N., Geyer, B., and Schrum, C.: Impacts of accelerating deployment of offshore windfarms on near-surface climate, Sci. Rep., 12, 18307–18323, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22868-9, 2022. 
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Gravity waves and wind-farm efficiency in neutral and stable conditions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 166, 269–299, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0307-5, 2018. 
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Sensitivity and feedback of wind-farm-induced gravity waves, J. Fluid Mech., 862, 990–1028, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.969, 2019. 
Archer, C. L., Vasel-Be-Hagh, A., Yan, C., Wu, S., Pan, Y., Brodie, J. F., and Maguire, A. E.: Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications, Appl. Energ., 226, 1187–1207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.085, 2018. 
Bleeg, J., Purcell, M., Ruisi, R., and Traiger, E.: Wind Farm Blockage and the Consequences of Neglecting Its Impact on Energy Production, Energies, 11, 1609, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061609, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Recent papers have investigated the impact of turbine drag on local wind patterns, but these studies have not given a full explanation of the induced pressure field. The pressure field blocks and deflects the wind and in other ways modifies farm efficiency. Current gravity wave models are complex and provide no estimation tools. We dig deeper into the cause of the pressure field and provide approximate closed-form expressions for pressure field effects.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint