Articles | Volume 8, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1225-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1225-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Offshore wind farm optimisation: a comparison of performance between regular and irregular wind turbine layouts
Maaike Sickler
Ventolines B.V., P.J. Oudweg 4, 1314 CH Almere, the Netherlands
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft, the Netherlands
DTU Wind Energy, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Bart Ummels
Ventolines B.V., P.J. Oudweg 4, 1314 CH Almere, the Netherlands
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, the Netherlands
Michiel Zaaijer
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft, the Netherlands
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft, the Netherlands
Katherine Dykes
DTU Wind Energy, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Related authors
No articles found.
Jelle Agatho Wilhelm Poland, Johannes Marinus van Spronsen, Mac Gaunaa, and Roland Schmehl
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-77, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-77, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
We tested a small model of an energy-generating kite in a wind tunnel to study its aerodynamic behavior. By comparing measurements to computer simulations, we validated the models and identified where they match the real performance and where they fall short. These insights will guide more accurate aerodynamic modeling and inform design choices for kites used in airborne wind energy systems.
Rishikesh Joshi, Dominic von Terzi, and Roland Schmehl
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 695–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-695-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-695-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a methodology for assessing the system design and scaling trends in airborne wind energy (AWE). A multi-disciplinary design, analysis, and optimisation (MDAO) framework was developed, integrating power, energy production, and cost models for the fixed-wing ground-generation (GG) AWE concept. Using the levelized cost of electricity (LCoE) as the design objective, we found that the optimal size of systems lies between the rated power of 100 and 1000 kW.
Helena Schmidt, Renatto M. Yupa-Villanueva, Daniele Ragni, Roberto Merino-Martínez, Piet J. R. van Gool, and Roland Schmehl
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 579–595, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-579-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-579-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates noise annoyance caused by airborne wind energy systems (AWESs), a novel wind energy technology that uses kites to harness high-altitude winds. Through a listening experiment with 75 participants, sharpness was identified as the key factor predicting annoyance. Fixed-wing kites generated more annoyance than soft-wing kites, likely due to their sharper, more tonal sound. The findings can help improve AWESs’ designs, reducing noise-related disturbances for nearby residents.
Oriol Cayon, Simon Watson, and Roland Schmehl
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-182, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-182, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates how kites used to generate wind energy can act as sensors to measure wind conditions and system behaviour. By combining data from existing sensors, such as those measuring position, speed, and forces on the tether, a sensor fusion technique accurately estimates wind conditions and kite performance. This approach can be integrated into control systems to help optimise energy generation and enhance the reliability of these systems in changing wind conditions.
Dylan Eijkelhof, Nicola Rossi, and Roland Schmehl
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-139, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-139, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares circular and figure-of-eight flight shapes for flying kite wind energy systems, assessing power output, stability, and system lifespan. Results show that circular patterns are ideal for maximizing energy in compact areas, while figure-of-eight paths, especially flying up in the centre of the figure, deliver smoother, more consistent power and have a longer expected kite lifespan. These findings offer valuable insights to enhance design and performance of kite systems.
Mihir Kishore Mehta, Michiel Zaaijer, and Dominic von Terzi
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2283–2300, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2283-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2283-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In a subsidy-free era, there is a need to optimize wind turbines for maximizing farm revenue instead of minimizing cost of energy. A wind-farm-level modeling framework with a simplified market model is used to optimize the turbine size for maximum profitability. The results show that the optimum size is driven mainly by the choice of the economic metric and the market price scenario, with a design optimized for the cost of energy already performing well w.r.t. most profitability-based metrics
Christoph Elfert, Dietmar Göhlich, and Roland Schmehl
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2261–2282, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This article presents a tow test procedure for measuring the steering behaviour of tethered membrane wings. The experimental set-up includes a novel onboard sensor system for measuring the position and orientation of the towed wing, complemented by an attached low-cost multi-hole probe for measuring the relative flow velocity vector at the wing. The measured data (steering gain and dead time) can be used to improve kite models and simulate the operation of airborne wind energy systems.
Rishikesh Joshi, Roland Schmehl, and Michiel Kruijff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2195–2215, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a fast cycle–power computation model for fixed-wing ground-generation airborne wind energy systems. It is suitable for sensitivity and scalability studies, which makes it a valuable tool for design and innovation trade-offs. It is also suitable for integration with cost models and systems engineering tools, enhancing its applicability in assessing the potential of airborne wind energy in the broader energy system.
Shadan Mozafari, Jennifer Rinker, Paul Veers, and Katherine Dykes
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-68, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-68, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
The study clarifies the use of probabilistic extrapolation of short/mid-term data for long-term site-specific fatigue assessments. In addition, it assesses the accountability of the Frandsen model in the Lillgrund wind farm as an example of compact layout.
Mark Schelbergen and Roland Schmehl
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1323–1344, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1323-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1323-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a novel two-point model of a kite with a suspended control unit to describe the characteristic swinging motion of this assembly during turning manoeuvres. Quasi-steady and dynamic model variants are combined with a discretised tether model, and simulation results are compared with measurement data of an instrumented kite system. By resolving the pitch of the kite, the model allows for computing the angle of attack, which is essential for estimating the generated aerodynamic forces.
Shadan Mozafari, Paul Veers, Jennifer Rinker, and Katherine Dykes
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 799–820, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-799-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-799-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Turbulence is one of the main drivers of fatigue in wind turbines. There is some debate on how to model the turbulence in normal wind conditions in the design phase. To address such debates, we study the fatigue load distribution and reliability following different models of the International Electrotechnical Commission 61400-1 standard. The results show the lesser importance of load uncertainty due to turbulence distribution compared to the uncertainty of material resistance and Miner’s rule.
Amalia Ida Hietanen, Thor Heine Snedker, Katherine Dykes, and Ilmas Bayati
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 417–438, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-417-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-417-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The layout of a floating offshore wind farm was optimized to maximize the relative net present value (NPV). By modeling power generation, losses, inter-array cables, anchors and operational costs, an increase of EUR 34.5 million in relative NPV compared to grid-based layouts was achieved. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the impact of economic factors, providing valuable insights. This study contributes to enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of floating wind farms.
Mihir Mehta, Michiel Zaaijer, and Dominic von Terzi
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 141–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-141-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Turbines are becoming larger. However, it is important to understand the key drivers of turbine design and explore the possibility of a global optimum, beyond which further upscaling might not reduce the cost of energy. This study explores, for a typical farm, the entire turbine design space with respect to rated power and rotor diameter. The results show a global optimum that is subject to various modeling uncertainties, farm design conditions, and policies with respect to wind farm tendering.
Lena Kitzing, David Rudolph, Sophie Nyborg, Helena Solman, Tom Cronin, Gundula Hübner, Elizabeth Gill, Katherine Dykes, Suzanne Tegen, and Julia Kirch Kirkegaard
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-174, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-174, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Social aspects are gaining traction in wind energy. A recent publication by Kirkegaard et al. lays out social grand challenges. We discuss them for a more technologically focused audience. We describe the role of social sciences in wind energy research, showing insights, topics, and value-added for public engagement and planning, just ownership and value-based design. We reflect how social and technical sciences can jointly advance wind energy research into a new interdisciplinary era.
Paul Veers, Katherine Dykes, Sukanta Basu, Alessandro Bianchini, Andrew Clifton, Peter Green, Hannele Holttinen, Lena Kitzing, Branko Kosovic, Julie K. Lundquist, Johan Meyers, Mark O'Malley, William J. Shaw, and Bethany Straw
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2491–2496, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy will play a central role in the transition of our energy system to a carbon-free future. However, many underlying scientific issues remain to be resolved before wind can be deployed in the locations and applications needed for such large-scale ambitions. The Grand Challenges are the gaps in the science left behind during the rapid growth of wind energy. This article explains the breadth of the unfinished business and introduces 10 articles that detail the research needs.
Johan Meyers, Carlo Bottasso, Katherine Dykes, Paul Fleming, Pieter Gebraad, Gregor Giebel, Tuhfe Göçmen, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2271–2306, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and the outstanding challenges in wind farm flow control, thus identifying the key research areas that could further enable commercial uptake and success. To this end, we have structured the discussion on challenges and opportunities into four main areas: (1) insight into control flow physics, (2) algorithms and AI, (3) validation and industry implementation, and (4) integrating control with system design
(co-design).
Erik Quaeghebeur, René Bos, and Michiel B. Zaaijer
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 815–839, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-815-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-815-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a technique to support the optimal layout (placement) of wind turbines in a wind farm. It efficiently determines good directions and distances for moving turbines. An improved layout reduces production losses and so makes the farm project economically more attractive. Compared to most existing techniques, our approach requires less time. This allows wind farm designers to explore more alternatives and provides the flexibility to adapt the layout to site-specific requirements.
Cited articles
Akay, B., Ragni, D., Ferreira, C. S., and Bussel, G. J. W. V.: Experimental
investigation of the root flow in a horizontal axis wind turbine, Wind
Energy, 17, 1093–1109, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1620, 2014. a, b
Bortolotti, P., Tarres, H. C., Dykes, K. L., Merz, K., Sethuraman, L., Verelst, D., and Zahle, F.: IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Systems Engineering in Wind Energy – WP2.1 Reference Wind Turbines, Technical Report NREL/TP-5000-73492, NREL – National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO, USA, https://doi.org/10.2172/1529216, 2019. a
Charhouni, N., Sallaou, M., and Mansouri, K.: Realistic wind farm design
layout optimization with different wind turbines types, Int. J. Energ. Environ. Eng., 10, 307–318, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-0303-2, 2019. a, b, c
Chen, Y., Li, H., He, B., Wang, P., and Jin, K.: Multi-objective genetic
algorithm based innovative wind farm layout optimization method, Energ.
Convers. Manage., 105, 1318–1327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.011, 2015. a
DuPont, B., Cagan, J., and Moriarty, P.: Optimization of Wind Farm Layout and
Wind Turbine Geometry Using a Multi-Level Extended Pattern Search Algorithm
That Accounts for Variation in Wind Shear Profile Shape, in: ASME 2012
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and
Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 3: 38th Design Automation
Conference, Parts A and B, 12–15 August 2012, Chicago, Illinois, USA, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2012-70290, 2012. a
Frohboese, P. and Schmuck, C.: Thrust coefficients used for estimation of wake effects for fatigue load calculation, in: European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2010, 20–23 April 2010, Warsaw, Poland, 1–10,
http://proceedings.ewea.org/ewec2010/allfiles2/207_EWEC2010presentation.pdf
(last access: 20 July 2023), 2010. a
Gonzalez, E., Nanos, E. M., Seyr, H., Valldecabres, L., Yürüşen,
N. Y., Smolka, U., Muskulus, M., and Melero, J. J.: Key Performance
Indicators for Wind Farm Operation and Maintenance, Energ. Proced., 137,
559–570, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.385, 2017. a
Grady, S. A., Hussaini, M. Y., and Abdullah, M. M.: Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms, Renew. Energy, 30, 259–270,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.05.007, 2005. a
Igwemezie, V., Mehmanparast, A., and Kolios, A.: Materials selection for XL wind turbine support structures: A corrosion-fatigue perspective, Mar.
Struct., 61, 381–397, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.06.008, 2018. a
IEA – International Energy Agency: Wind Electricity,
https://www.iea.org/reports/wind-electricity (last access: 20 July 2023), 2022. a
Karouani, Y. and Elhoussaine, Z.: Toward an intelligent traffic management
based on big data for smart city, in: Innovations in Smart Cities and
Applications, vol. 37 of SCAMS 2017, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, edited by: Ben Ahmed, M. and Boudhir, A., Springer, Cham, 502–514, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74500-8_47, 2018.
a, b
Marmidis, G., Lazarou, S., and Pyrgioti, E.: Optimal placement of wind turbines in a wind park using Monte Carlo simulation, Renew. Energy, 33, 1455–1460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.09.004, 2008. a
Musgrove, P.: Wind Power, in: no. 9780521762380 in Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press,
https://ideas.repec.org/b/cup/cbooks/9780521762380.html (last access: 20 July 2023), 2009. a
Nissen, U. and Harfst, N.: Shortcomings of the traditional “levelized cost of energy” [LCOE] for the determination of grid parity, Energy, 171,
1009–1016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.093, 2019. a
Nygaard, N. G.: Wakes in very large wind farms and the effect of neighbouring
wind farms, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 524, 012162, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012162, 2014. a, b
Ostachowicz, W., McGugan, M., Schröder-Hinrichs, J. U., and Luczak, M.:
MARE-WINT: New materials and reliability in offshore wind turbine technology, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39095-6, 2016. a, b, c
Riezebos, H. J., Hasselaar, R., Raaijmakers, T., and Vermaas, T.: Site Studies Wind Farm Zone Borssele: Morphodynamics of Borssele Wind Farm Zone, Tech. rep., Deltares,
https://english.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2015/02/Site Studies Wind Farm Zone Borssele_Morphodynamics of Borssele Wind Farm Zone.pdf (last access: 20 July 2023), 2015. a
Sanchez Perez Moreno, S.: A guideline for selecting MDAO workflows with an
application in offshore wind energy, PhD thesis, Delft University of
Technology, https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:ea1b4101-0e55-4abe-9539-ae5d81cf9f65, 2019.
a, b, c, d
Shafiee, M., Brennan, F., and Espinosa, I. A.: A parametric whole life cost
model for offshore wind farms, Int. J. Life Cy. Assess., 21, 961–975, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1075-z, 2016. a
Shakoor, R., Hassan, M. Y., Raheem, A., and Rasheed, N.: Wind farm layout
optimization using area dimensions and definite point selection techniques,
Renew. Energy, 88, 154–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.021, 2016. a
Stanley, A. P. and Ning, A.: Coupled wind turbine design and layout optimization with nonhomogeneous wind turbines, Wind Energ. Sci., 4,
99–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-99-2019, 2019. a, b
Tao, J. Y. and Finenko, A.: Moving beyond LCOE: impact of various financing
methods on PV profitability for SIDS, Energy Policy, 98, 749–758,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.021, 2016. a
Thomsen, K. and Sørensen, P.: Fatigue loads for wind turbines operating in
wakes, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 80, 121–136, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00194-9, 1999. a, b
Short summary
This paper investigates the effect of wind farm layout on the performance of offshore wind farms. A regular farm layout is compared to optimised irregular layouts. The irregular layouts have higher annual energy production, and the power production is less sensitive to wind direction. However, turbine towers require thicker walls to counteract increased fatigue due to increased turbulence levels in the farm. The study shows that layout optimisation can be used to maintain high-yield performance.
This paper investigates the effect of wind farm layout on the performance of offshore wind...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint