Articles | Volume 8, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1533-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1533-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
16 Oct 2023
Research article |
| 16 Oct 2023
| 16 Oct 2023
A decision-tree-based measure–correlate–predict approach for peak wind gust estimation from a global reanalysis dataset
Serkan Kartal
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Sukanta Basu
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Simon J. Watson
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Related authors
No articles found.
Kayacan Kestel, Xavier Chesterman, Donatella Zappalá, Simon Watson, Mingxin Li, Edward Hart, James Carroll, Yolanda Vidal, Amir R. Nejad, Shawn Sheng, Yi Guo, Matthias Stammler, Florian Wirsing, Ahmed Saleh, Nico Gregarek, Thao Baszenski, Thomas Decker, Martin Knops, Georg Jacobs, Benjamin Lehmann, Florian König, Ines Pereira, Pieter-Jan Daems, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-168, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-168, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy use has been rapidly expanding worldwide in recent years. Driven by global decarbonization goals and energy security concerns, this growth is expected to continue. To achieve these targets, production costs must decrease, with operation and maintenance being major contributors. This paper reviews current and emerging technologies for monitoring wind turbine drivetrains and highlights key academic and industrial challenges that may hinder progress.
Harish Baki, Sukanta Basu, and George Lavidas
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1575–1609, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1575-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1575-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores how frontal low-level jets (FLLJs) impact wind power production by causing ramp-down events. Using the Weather Research and Forecasting model, we analyzed various modeling configurations and found that initial and boundary conditions, domain configuration, and wind farm parameterization significantly influence simulations. Our findings show such extreme events can be forecasted 1 d in advance, helping manage wind power more efficiently for a stable, reliable energy supply.
Mehtab Ahmed Khan, Dries Allaerts, Simon J. Watson, and Matthew J. Churchfield
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1167–1185, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1167-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1167-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To guide realistic atmospheric gravity wave simulations, we study flow over a two-dimensional hill and through a wind farm canopy, examining optimal domain size and damping layer setup. Wave properties based on non-dimensional numbers determine the optimal domain and damping parameters. Accurate solutions require the domain length to exceed the effective horizontal wavelength, height, and damping thickness to equal the vertical wavelength and non-dimensional damping strength between 1 and 10.
Ali Eftekhari Milani, Donatella Zappalá, Francesco Castellani, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-62, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-62, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This paper proposes a data-driven approach to simulate wind turbine sensor time series, such as temperature and pressure signals, describing the behaviour of a wind turbine component as it degrades through time up to the failure point. It allows for the simulation of new failure events or the replication of a given failure under different conditions. The results show that the synthetic signals generated using this approach improve the performance of fault detection and prognosis methods.
Dachuan Feng and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-52, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-52, 2025
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
Weather effects drive wind turbines loads and performance to be different from those under mean atmospheric conditions. However, the influence of unsteady atmospheric phenomena on wake behavior remains unclear. This paper explores how atmospheric gravity waves—large-scale wave-like patterns caused by topographical features—affect meandering motions and turbulence generation in the wake region. The outputs of this paper can be used to guide wake modeling in realistic atmospheric flows.
Branko Kosović, Sukanta Basu, Jacob Berg, Larry K. Berg, Sue E. Haupt, Xiaoli G. Larsén, Joachim Peinke, Richard J. A. M. Stevens, Paul Veers, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-42, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-42, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Most human activity happens in the layer of the atmosphere which extends a few hundred meters to a couple of kilometers above the surface of the Earth. The flow in this layer is turbulent. Turbulence impacts wind power production and turbine lifespan. Optimizing wind turbine performance requires understanding how turbulence affects both wind turbine efficiency and reliability. This paper points to gaps in our knowledge that need to be addressed to effectively utilize wind resources.
Oriol Cayon, Simon Watson, and Roland Schmehl
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-182, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-182, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates how kites used to generate wind energy can act as sensors to measure wind conditions and system behaviour. By combining data from existing sensors, such as those measuring position, speed, and forces on the tether, a sensor fusion technique accurately estimates wind conditions and kite performance. This approach can be integrated into control systems to help optimise energy generation and enhance the reliability of these systems in changing wind conditions.
Majid Bastankhah, Marcus Becker, Matthew Churchfield, Caroline Draxl, Jay Prakash Goit, Mehtab Khan, Luis A. Martinez Tossas, Johan Meyers, Patrick Moriarty, Wim Munters, Asim Önder, Sara Porchetta, Eliot Quon, Ishaan Sood, Nicole van Lipzig, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, Paul Veers, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2171–2174, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2171-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2171-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Dries Allaerts was born on 19 May 1989 and passed away at his home in Wezemaal, Belgium, on 10 October 2024 after battling cancer. Dries started his wind energy career in 2012 and had a profound impact afterward on the community, in terms of both his scientific realizations and his many friendships and collaborations in the field. His scientific acumen, open spirit of collaboration, positive attitude towards life, and playful and often cheeky sense of humor will be deeply missed by many.
Livia Brandetti, Sebastiaan Paul Mulders, Roberto Merino-Martinez, Simon Watson, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 471–493, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-471-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents a multi-objective optimisation approach to balance vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) performance and noise, comparing the combined wind speed estimator and tip-speed ratio (WSE–TSR) tracking controller with a baseline. Psychoacoustic annoyance is used as a novel metric for human perception of wind turbine noise. Results showcase the WSE–TSR tracking controller’s potential in trading off the considered objectives, thereby fostering the deployment of VAWTs in urban areas.
Livia Brandetti, Sebastiaan Paul Mulders, Yichao Liu, Simon Watson, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1553–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents the additional benefits of applying an advanced combined wind speed estimator and tip-speed ratio tracking (WSE–TSR) controller compared to the baseline Kω2. Using a frequency-domain framework and an optimal calibration procedure, the WSE–TSR tracking control scheme shows a more flexible trade-off between conflicting objectives: power maximisation and load minimisation. Therefore, implementing this controller on large-scale wind turbines will facilitate their operation.
Sarah J. Ollier and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1179–1200, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1179-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1179-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This modelling study shows that topographic trapped lee waves (TLWs) modify flow behaviour and power output in offshore wind farms. We demonstrate that TLWs can substantially alter the wind speeds at individual wind turbines and effect the power output of the turbine and whole wind farm. The impact on wind speeds and power is dependent on which part of the TLW wave cycle interacts with the wind turbines and wind farm. Positive and negative impacts of TLWs on power output are observed.
Paul Veers, Katherine Dykes, Sukanta Basu, Alessandro Bianchini, Andrew Clifton, Peter Green, Hannele Holttinen, Lena Kitzing, Branko Kosovic, Julie K. Lundquist, Johan Meyers, Mark O'Malley, William J. Shaw, and Bethany Straw
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2491–2496, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy will play a central role in the transition of our energy system to a carbon-free future. However, many underlying scientific issues remain to be resolved before wind can be deployed in the locations and applications needed for such large-scale ambitions. The Grand Challenges are the gaps in the science left behind during the rapid growth of wind energy. This article explains the breadth of the unfinished business and introduces 10 articles that detail the research needs.
Amir R. Nejad, Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, Shawn Sheng, Henk Polinder, Simon Watson, Jianning Dong, Zian Qin, Amir Ebrahimi, Ralf Schelenz, Francisco Gutiérrez Guzmán, Daniel Cornel, Reza Golafshan, Georg Jacobs, Bart Blockmans, Jelle Bosmans, Bert Pluymers, James Carroll, Sofia Koukoura, Edward Hart, Alasdair McDonald, Anand Natarajan, Jone Torsvik, Farid K. Moghadam, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 387–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the state-of-the-art technologies and development trends of wind turbine drivetrains – the energy conversion systems transferring the kinetic energy of the wind to electrical energy – in different stages of their life cycle: design, manufacturing, installation, operation, lifetime extension, decommissioning and recycling. The main aim of this article is to review the drivetrain technology development as well as to identify future challenges and research gaps.
Bedassa R. Cheneka, Simon J. Watson, and Sukanta Basu
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1731–1741, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1731-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1731-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Wind power ramps have important characteristics for the planning and integration of wind power production into electricity. We present a new and simple algorithm that detects wind power ramp characteristics. The algorithm classifies wind power production into ramp-ups, ramp-downs, and no-ramps; and it can detect wind power ramp characteristics that show a temporal increasing (decreasing) power capacity.
Cited articles
Ágústsson, H. and Ólafsson, H.: Forecasting wind gusts in complex terrain, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 103, 173–185, 2009. a
Asadi, M. and Pourhossein, K.: Wind farm site selection considering turbulence intensity, Energy, 236, 121480, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121480, 2021. a
Ashcroft, J.: The relationship between the gust ratio, terrain roughness, gust duration and the hourly mean wind speed, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 53, 331–355, 1994. a
Azorin-Molina, C., Guijarro, J.-A., McVicar, T. R., Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Chen, D., Jerez, S., and Espírito-Santo, F.: Trends of daily peak wind gusts in Spain and Portugal, 1961–2014, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1059–1078, 2016. a
Basu, S., He, P., and DeMarco, A. W.: Parametrizing the energy dissipation rate in stably stratified flows, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 178, 167–184, 2021. a
Beljaars, A. C. M.: The influence of sampling and filtering on measured wind gusts, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 4, 613–626, 1987. a
Boutle, I. A., Eyre, J. E. J., and Lock, A. P.: Seamless stratocumulus simulation across the turbulent gray zone, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 1655–1668, 2014. FLAML optimizes hyperparameters usin a
Brasseur, O.: Development and application of a physical approach to estimating wind gusts, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 5–25, 2001. a
Brázdil, R., Hostỳnek, J., Řezníčková, L., Zahradníček, P., Tolasz, R., Dobrovolnỳ, P., and Štěpánek, P.: The variability of maximum wind gusts in the Czech Republic between 1961 and 2014, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 1961–1978, 2017. a
Brook, R. R. and Spillane, K. T.: The effect of averaging time and sample duration on estimation and measurement of maximum wind gusts, J. Appl. Meteorol., 9, 567–574, 1968. a
Brook, R. R. and Spillane, K. T.: On the variation of maximum wind gusts with height, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 9, 72–78, 1970. a
Carta, J. A., Velázquez, S., and Cabrera, P.: A review of measure-correlate-predict (MCP) methods used to estimate long-term wind characteristics at a target site, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 27, 362–400, 2013. a
CDS: Welcome to the Climate Data Store, https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu (last access: 14 October 2023), 2023. a
Chen, T. and Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sig KDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 13–17 August 2016, San Francisco, California, USA, 785–794, https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785, 2016. a
Choi, E. C. C. and Hidayat, F. A.: Gust factors for thunderstorm and non-thunderstorm winds, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 90, 1683–1696, 2002. a
Deacon, E. L.: Gust variation with height up to 150 m, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 562–573, 1955. a
Dimitrov, N., Natarajan, A., and Mann, J.: Effects of normal and extreme turbulence spectral parameters on wind turbine loads, Renew. Energy, 101, 1180–1193, 2017. a
Ebrahimi, A. and Sekandari, M.: Transient response of the flexible blade of horizontal-axis wind turbines in wind gusts and rapid yaw changes, Energy, 145, 261–275, 2018. a
ECMWF: IFS Documentation – Cy47r1, Operational Implementation, Part IV: Physical Processes, Tech. rep., European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/publications/ifs-documentation (last access: 14 October 2023), 2020. a
Enloe, J., O'Brien, J. J., and Smith, S. R.: ENSO impacts on peak wind gusts in the United States, J. Climate, 17, 1728–1737, 2004. a
Fovell, R. G. and Cao, Y.: The Santa Ana winds of Southern California: winds, gusts, and the 2007 Witch fire, Wind Struct., 24, 529–564, 2017. a
Freund, Y. and Schapire, R.: A short introduction to boosting, J. Jpn. Soc. Artific. Intel., 14, 771–780, 1999. a
Friedman, J. H.: Stochastic gradient boosting, Comput. Stat. Data Ana., 38, 367–378, 2002. a
Fujita, T. T.: The Downburst, The University of Chicago, http://hdl.handle.net/10605/262010 (last access: 14 October 2023), 1985. a
Geurts, P., Ernst, D., and Wehenkel, L.: Extremely Randomized Trees, Mach. Learn., 63, 3–42, 2006. a
Goyette, S., Brasseur, O., and Beniston, M.: Application of a new wind gust parameterization: Multiscale case studies performed with the Canadian regional climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4374, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002646, 2003. a
Gualtieri, G.: Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 167, 112741, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112741, 2022. a
Hansen, K. S. and Larsen, G. C.: Characterising turbulence intensity for fatigue load analysis of wind turbines, Wind Eng., 29, 319–329, 2005. a
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. H.: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, in: 2nd Edn., Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7, 2009. a
Hawbecker, P., Basu, S., and Manuel, L.: Realistic simulations of the July 1, 2011 severe wind event over the Buffalo Ridge Wind Farm, Wind Energy, 20, 1803–1822, 2017. a
Hedevang, E.: Wind turbine power curves incorporating turbulence intensity, Wind Energy, 17, 173–195, 2014. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X.,Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, 2020. a
Holmes, J. D.: Wind Loading of Structures, Taylor & Francis, https://doi.org/10.1201/b18029, 2001. a, b
Hu, W., Letson, F., Barthelmie, R. J., and Pryor, S. C.: Wind gust characterization at wind turbine relevant heights in moderately complex terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 57, 1459–1476, 2018. a
IEC: IEC 61400-1, Ed. 4, Wind Turbine Generator Systems, Part 1 – Safety Requirements, Tech. rep., International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/26423 (last access: 14 October 2023), 2019. a
Ishihara, T., Yamaguchi, A., Takahara, K., Mekaru, T., and Matsuura, S.: An analysis of damaged wind turbines by typhoon Maemi in 2003, in: Proc. of the Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, 12–14 September 2005, Seoul, Korea, 1413–1428, ISBN 9788989693154, 2005. a
Kartal, S.: Peak Wind Gust Estimation, GitHub [code], https://github.com/serkankartal/PeakWindGustEstimation (last access: 14 October 2023), 2023. a
Kelley, N. D., Osgood, R. M., Bialasiewicz, J. T., and Jakubowski, A.: Using wavelet analysis to assess turbulence/rotor interactions, Wind Energy, 3, 121–134, 2000. a
Kohonen, T.: The self-organizing map, Proc. IEEE, 78, 1464–1480, 1990. a
Kohonen, T.: Essentials of the self-organizing map, Neural Networks, 37, 52–65, 2013. a
Kurbatova, M., Rubinstein, K., Gubenko, I., and Kurbatov, G.: Comparison of seven wind gust parameterizations over the European part of Russia, Adv. Sci. Res., 15, 251–255, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-251-2018, 2018. a, b
Lee, J. C. Y., Stuart, P., Clifton, A., Fields, M. J., Perr-Sauer, J., Williams, L., Cameron, L., Geer, T., and Housley, P.: The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 199–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-199-2020, 2020. a
Lombardo, F. T.: History of the peak three-second gust, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 208, 104447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104447, 2021. a
Lombardo, F. T. and Zickar, A. S.: Characteristics of measured extreme thunderstorm near-surface wind gusts in the United States, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 193, 103961, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103961, 2019. a
Lombardo, F. T., Smith, D. A., Schroeder, J. L., and Mehta, K. C.: Thunderstorm characteristics of importance to wind engineering, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 125, 121–132, 2014. a
Machado, M. R., Karray, S., and de Sousa, I. T.: LightGBM: An effective decision tree gradient boosting method to predict customer loyalty in the finance industry, in: IEEE 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 19–21 August 2019, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1111–1116, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2019.8845529, 2019. a
MESONET: West Texas Mesonet, https://www.mesonet.ttu.edu/ (last access: 14 October 2023), 2023. a
Milan, P., Wächter, M., and Peinke, J.: Turbulent character of wind energy, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 138701, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.138701, 2013. a
Murphy, K. P.: Probabilistic Machine Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press, ISBN 9780262046824, 2022. a
NOAA: Gust. Glossary of Meteorology, https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=wind gust (last access: 14 October 2023), 2023. a
Olauson, J.: ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling?, Renew. Energy, 126, 322–331, 2018. a
Panofsky, H. A. and Dutton, J. A.: Atmospheric Turbulence, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 9780471057147, 1984. a
Petersen, E. L., Mortensen, N. G., Landberg, L., Højstrup, J., and Frank, H. P.: Wind power meteorology. Part I: Climate and turbulence, Wind Energy, 1, 25–45, 1998. a
Ramon, J., Lledó, L., Torralba, V., Soret, A., and Doblas-Reyes, F. J.: What global reanalysis best represents near-surface winds?, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 3236–3251, 2019. a
Ren, G., Liu, J., Wan, J., Li, F., Guo, Y., and Yu, D.: The analysis of turbulence intensity based on wind speed data in onshore wind farms, Renew. Energy, 123, 756–766, 2018. a
Rogers, A. L., Rogers, J. W., and Manwell, J. F.: Comparison of the performance of four measure–correlate–predict algorithms, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 93, 243–264, 2005. a
Rohatgi, J. S. and Nelson, V.: Wind Characteristics: An analysis for the generation of wind power, Alternative Energy Institute, West Texas A&M University, ISBN 9780808714781, 1994. a
Rokach, L. and Maimon, O.: Data Mining with Decision Trees: Theory and Applications, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., ISBN 978-9814590082, 2008. a
Sallis, P. J., Claster, W., and Hernández, S.: A machine-learning algorithm for wind gust prediction, Comput. Geosci., 37, 1337–1344, 2011. a
Shin, H. H. and Hong, S.-Y.: Representation of the subgrid-scale turbulent transport in convective boundary layers at gray-zone resolutions, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 250–271, 2015. a
Shu, Z. R., Chan, P. W., Li, Q. S., He, Y. C., Yan, B. W., Li, L., Lu, C., Zhang, L., and Yang, H. L.: Assessing wind gust characteristics at wind turbine relevant height, J. Renew. Sustain. Energ., 13, 063308, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0053077, 2021. a
Siddiqui, M. S., Rasheed, A., Kvamsdal, T., and Tabib, M.: Effect of turbulence intensity on the performance of an offshore vertical axis wind turbine, Energ. Proced., 80, 312–320, 2015. a
Solari, G.: Wind Science and Engineering: Origins, developments, fundamentals and advancements, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18815-3, 2019. a
Spassiani, A. C. and Mason, M. S.: Application of Self-organizing Maps to classify the meteorological origin of wind gusts in Australia, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 210, 104529, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104529, 2021. a, b
Spiliotis, E.: Decision Trees for Time-Series Forecasting, Foresight, 64, 30–44, 2022. a
St. Martin, C. M., Lundquist, J. K., Clifton, A., Poulos, G. S., and Schreck, S. J.: Wind turbine power production and annual energy production depend on atmospheric stability and turbulence, Wind Energ. Sci., 1, 221–236, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-1-221-2016, 2016. a
Stucki, P., Dierer, S., Welker, C., Gómez-Navarro, J. J., Raible, C. C., Martius, O., and Brönnimann, S.: Evaluation of downscaled wind speeds and parameterised gusts for recent and historical windstorms in Switzerland, Tellus A, 68, 31820, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v68.31820, 2016. a, b, c, d
Sumner, J. and Masson, C.: Influence of atmospheric stability on wind turbine power performance curves, J. Sol. Energ. Eng., 128, 531–538, 2006. a
Suomi, I., Vihma, T., Gryning, S.-E., and Fortelius, C.: Wind-gust parametrizations at heights relevant for wind energy: A study based on mast observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 139, 1298–1310, 2013. a
Suomi, I., Gryning, S.-E., Floors, R., Vihma, T., and Fortelius, C.: On the vertical structure of wind gusts, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 1658–1670, 2015. a
Wade, C.: Hands-on Gradient Boosting with XGBoost and scikit-learn, Packt Publishing Ltd., ISBN 9781839218354, 2020. a
Wang, C., Wu, Q., Weimer, M., and Zhu, E.: FLAML: A fast and lightweight automl library, Proc. Mach. Learn. Syst., 3, 434–447, 2021. a
Wang, H., Zhang, Y.-M., Mao, J.-X., and Wan, H.-P.: A probabilistic approach for short-term prediction of wind gust speed using ensemble learning, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 202, 104198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104198, 2020. a, b
Wang, H., Zhang, Y.-M., and Mao, J.-X.: Sparse Gaussian process regression for multi-step ahead forecasting of wind gusts combining numerical weather predictions and on-site measurements, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 220, 104873, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104873, 2022. a, b
Weggel, J. R.: Maximum daily wind gusts related to mean daily wind speed, J. Struct. Eng., 125, 465–468, 1999. a
Wharton, S. and Lundquist, J. K.: Atmospheric stability affects wind turbine power collection, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 014005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014005, 2012. a
Wieringa, J.: Gust factors over open water and built-up country, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 3, 424–441, 1973. a
Wu, Q., Wang, C., and Huang, S.: Frugal optimization for cost-related hyperparameters, Proc. AAAI Conf. Artific. Intel., 35, 10347–10354, 2021. a
Short summary
Peak wind gust is a crucial meteorological variable for wind farm planning and operations. Unfortunately, many wind farms do not have on-site measurements of it. In this paper, we propose a machine-learning approach (called INTRIGUE, decIsioN-TRee-based wInd GUst Estimation) that utilizes numerous inputs from a public-domain reanalysis dataset, generating long-term, site-specific peak wind gust series.
Peak wind gust is a crucial meteorological variable for wind farm planning and operations....
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint