Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-495-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-495-2024
Research article
 | 
04 Mar 2024
Research article |  | 04 Mar 2024

Measurement-driven large-eddy simulations of a diurnal cycle during a wake-steering field campaign

Eliot Quon

Related authors

Wind Farm Structural Response and Wake Dynamics for an Evolving Stable Boundary Layer: Computational and Experimental Comparisons
Kelsey Shaler, Eliot Quon, Hristo Ivanov, and Jason Jonkman
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-138,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-138, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Lessons learned in coupling atmospheric models across scales for onshore and offshore wind energy
Sue Ellen Haupt, Branko Kosović, Larry K. Berg, Colleen M. Kaul, Matthew Churchfield, Jeffrey Mirocha, Dries Allaerts, Thomas Brummet, Shannon Davis, Amy DeCastro, Susan Dettling, Caroline Draxl, David John Gagne, Patrick Hawbecker, Pankaj Jha, Timothy Juliano, William Lassman, Eliot Quon, Raj K. Rai, Michael Robinson, William Shaw, and Regis Thedin
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1251–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Investigations of correlation and coherence in turbulence from a large-eddy simulation
Regis Thedin, Eliot Quon, Matthew Churchfield, and Paul Veers
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 487–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-487-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-487-2023, 2023
Short summary
The curled wake model: a three-dimensional and extremely fast steady-state wake solver for wind plant flows
Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Jennifer King, Eliot Quon, Christopher J. Bay, Rafael Mudafort, Nicholas Hamilton, Michael F. Howland, and Paul A. Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 555–570, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-555-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-555-2021, 2021
Short summary
Wind direction estimation using SCADA data with consensus-based optimization
Jennifer Annoni, Christopher Bay, Kathryn Johnson, Emiliano Dall'Anese, Eliot Quon, Travis Kemper, and Paul Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 355–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-355-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-355-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Evaluation of wind farm parameterizations in the WRF model under different atmospheric stability conditions with high-resolution wake simulations
Oscar García-Santiago, Andrea N. Hahmann, Jake Badger, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 963–979, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024, 2024
Short summary
Renewable Energy Complementarity (RECom) maps – a comprehensive visualisation tool to support spatial diversification
Til Kristian Vrana and Harald G. Svendsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 919–932, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-919-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-919-2024, 2024
Short summary
Control-oriented modelling of wind direction variability
Scott Dallas, Adam Stock, and Edward Hart
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 841–867, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-841-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-841-2024, 2024
Short summary
Machine learning methods to improve spatial predictions of coastal wind speed profiles and low-level jets using single-level ERA5 data
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Ville Vakkari, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 821–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Offshore low-level jet observations and model representation using lidar buoy data off the California coast
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, William I. Gustafson Jr., Ye Liu, Brian J. Gaudet, Nicola Bodini, Rob K. Newsom, and Mikhail Pekour
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 741–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbas, N., Zalkind, D., and Mudafort, R.: NREL's Reference OpenSource Controller (ROSCO) toolbox for wind turbine applications, version 2.0.2, GitHub [code], https://github.com/NREL/ROSCO (last access: 7 July 2020), 2020. a
Abbas, N. J., Zalkind, D. S., Pao, L., and Wright, A.: A Reference Open-Source Controller for Fixed and Floating Offshore Wind Turbines, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 53–73, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-53-2022, 2022. a
Abkar, M., Sharifi, A., and Porté-Agel, F.: Wake Flow in a Wind Farm during a Diurnal Cycle, J. Turbul., 17, 420–441, https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2015.1127379, 2016. a
Allaerts, D., Quon, E., and Churchfield, M.: Using Observational Mean-flow Data to Drive Large-eddy Simulations of a Diurnal Cycle at the SWiFT Site, Wind Energy, 26, 469–492, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2811, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f
Allaerts, D. J. N., Quon, E., Draxl, C., and Churchfield, M.: Development of a Time–Height Profile Assimilation Technique for Large-Eddy Simulation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 176, 2533–2550, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00538-5, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Download
Short summary
Engineering models used to design wind farms generally do not account for realistic atmospheric conditions that can rapidly evolve from minute to minute. This paper uses a first-principles simulation technique to predict the performance of five wind turbines during a wind farm control experiment. Challenges included limited observations and atypical conditions. The simulation accurately predicts the aerodynamics of a turbine when it is situated partially within the wake of an upstream turbine.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint