Articles | Volume 9, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-841-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-841-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article
| 
10 Apr 2024
Review article |
| 10 Apr 2024
| 10 Apr 2024
Control-oriented modelling of wind direction variability
Wind and Marine Energy Systems and Structures, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Adam Stock
Institute of Mechanical, Processes and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Edward Hart
Wind Energy and Control Centre, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Related authors
No articles found.
Piotr Fojcik, Edward Hart, and Emil Hedevang
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-17, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-17, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Increasing the efficiency of wind farms can be achieved via reducing the impact of wakes: flow regions with lower wind speed occurring downwind from turbines. This work describes training and validation of a novel method for estimation of the wake effects impacting a turbine. The results show that for most tested wind conditions, the developed model is capable of robust detection of wake presence, and accurate characterisation of its properties. Further validation and improvements are planned.
Edward Hart
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-187, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-187, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
A parametric model for the wind direction rose is presented, with testing on real offshore wind farm data indicating the model is indeed representative. The presented model provides opportunities for standardisation and enables more systematic analyses of wind direction impacts and sensitivities.
Edward Hart, Elisha de Mello, and Rob Dwyer-Joyce
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1533–1550, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1533-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1533-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is the second in a two-part study on lubrication in wind turbine main bearings. Investigations are conducted concerning lubrication in the double-row spherical roller main bearing of a 1.5 MW wind turbine. This includes effects relating to temperature, starvation, grease-thickener interactions and possible non-steady EHL effects. Results predict that the modelled main bearing would be expected to operate under mixed lubrication conditions for a non-negligible proportion of its life.
Edward Hart, Adam Stock, George Elderfield, Robin Elliott, James Brasseur, Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, and Wooyong Song
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1209–1226, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1209-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1209-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We consider characteristics and drivers of loads experienced by wind turbine main bearings using simplified models of hub and main-bearing configurations. Influences of deterministic wind characteristics are investigated for 5, 7.5, and 10 MW turbine models. Load response to gusts and wind direction changes are also considered. Cubic load scaling is observed, veer is identified as an important driver of load fluctuations, and strong links between control and main-bearing load response are shown.
Edward Hart, Elisha de Mello, and Rob Dwyer-Joyce
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1021–1042, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work provides an accessible introduction to elastohydrodynamic lubrication theory as a precursor to analysis of lubrication in a wind turbine main bearing. Fundamental concepts, derivations and formulas are presented, followed by the more advanced topics of starvation, non-steady effects, surface roughness interactions and grease lubrication.
Amir R. Nejad, Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, Shawn Sheng, Henk Polinder, Simon Watson, Jianning Dong, Zian Qin, Amir Ebrahimi, Ralf Schelenz, Francisco Gutiérrez Guzmán, Daniel Cornel, Reza Golafshan, Georg Jacobs, Bart Blockmans, Jelle Bosmans, Bert Pluymers, James Carroll, Sofia Koukoura, Edward Hart, Alasdair McDonald, Anand Natarajan, Jone Torsvik, Farid K. Moghadam, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 387–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the state-of-the-art technologies and development trends of wind turbine drivetrains – the energy conversion systems transferring the kinetic energy of the wind to electrical energy – in different stages of their life cycle: design, manufacturing, installation, operation, lifetime extension, decommissioning and recycling. The main aim of this article is to review the drivetrain technology development as well as to identify future challenges and research gaps.
James Stirling, Edward Hart, and Abbas Kazemi Amiri
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 15–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-15-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-15-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper considers the modelling of wind turbine main bearings using analytical models. The validity of simplified analytical representations is explored by comparing main-bearing force reactions with those obtained from higher-fidelity 3D finite-element models. Results indicate that good agreement can be achieved between the analytical and 3D models in the case of both non-moment-reacting (such as for a spherical roller bearing) and moment-reacting (such as a tapered roller bearing) set-ups.
Edward Hart, Benjamin Clarke, Gary Nicholas, Abbas Kazemi Amiri, James Stirling, James Carroll, Rob Dwyer-Joyce, Alasdair McDonald, and Hui Long
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 105–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-105-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-105-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a review of existing theory and practice relating to main bearings for wind turbines. Topics covered include wind conditions and resulting rotor loads, main-bearing models, damage mechanisms and fault detection procedures.
Related subject area
Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Observations of wind farm wake recovery at an operating wind farm
Periods of constant wind speed: how long do they last in the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer?
Characterization of local wind profiles: a random forest approach for enhanced wind profile extrapolation
Simulations suggest offshore wind farms modify low-level jets
On the lidar-turbulence paradox and possible countermeasures
The actuator farm model for large eddy simulation (LES) of wind-farm-induced atmospheric gravity waves and farm–farm interaction
Understanding the impact of data gaps on long-term offshore wind resource estimates
Converging profile relationships for offshore wind speed and turbulence intensity
An analytical formulation for turbulent kinetic energy added by wind turbines based on large-eddy simulation
A simple steady-state inflow model of the neutral and stable atmospheric boundary layer applied to wind turbine wake simulations
Influences of lidar scanning parameters on wind turbine wake retrievals in complex terrain
Tall Wind Profile Validation Using Lidar Observations and Hindcast Data
Experimental evaluation of wind turbine wake turbulence impacts on a general aviation aircraft
Underestimation of strong wind speeds offshore in ERA5: evidence, discussion and correction
Brief communication: A simple axial induction modification to the Weather Research and Forecasting Fitch wind farm parameterization
Impact of swell waves on atmospheric surface turbulence: wave–turbulence decomposition methods
Flow acceleration statistics: a new paradigm for wind-driven loads, towards probabilistic turbine design
Machine-learning-based estimate of the wind speed over complex terrain using the long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network
Method to predict the minimum measurement and experiment durations needed to achieve converged and significant results in a wind energy field experiment
Evaluation of wind farm parameterizations in the WRF model under different atmospheric stability conditions with high-resolution wake simulations
Renewable Energy Complementarity (RECom) maps – a comprehensive visualisation tool to support spatial diversification
Machine learning methods to improve spatial predictions of coastal wind speed profiles and low-level jets using single-level ERA5 data
Offshore low-level jet observations and model representation using lidar buoy data off the California coast
Measurement-driven large-eddy simulations of a diurnal cycle during a wake-steering field campaign
The fractal turbulent–non-turbulent interface in the atmosphere
TOSCA – an open-source, finite-volume, large-eddy simulation (LES) environment for wind farm flows
Quantitative comparison of power production and power quality onshore and offshore: a case study from the eastern United States
The wind farm pressure field
Realistic turbulent inflow conditions for estimating the performance of a floating wind turbine
Brief communication: On the definition of the low-level jet
A decision-tree-based measure–correlate–predict approach for peak wind gust estimation from a global reanalysis dataset
Revealing inflow and wake conditions of a 6 MW floating turbine
Stochastic gradient descent for wind farm optimization
Modelling the impact of trapped lee waves on offshore wind farm power output
Applying a random time mapping to Mann-modeled turbulence for the generation of intermittent wind fields
From shear to veer: theory, statistics, and practical application
Quantification and correction of motion influence for nacelle-based lidar systems on floating wind turbines
Gaussian mixture models for the optimal sparse sampling of offshore wind resource
Dependence of turbulence estimations on nacelle lidar scanning strategies
Vertical extrapolation of Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) ocean surface winds using machine-learning techniques
An investigation of spatial wind direction variability and its consideration in engineering models
From gigawatt to multi-gigawatt wind farms: wake effects, energy budgets and inertial gravity waves investigated by large-eddy simulations
Investigations of correlation and coherence in turbulence from a large-eddy simulation
Validation of turbulence intensity as simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting model off the US northeast coast
On the laminar–turbulent transition mechanism on megawatt wind turbine blades operating in atmospheric flow
Brief communication: A momentum-conserving superposition method applied to the super-Gaussian wind turbine wake model
Turbulence structures and entrainment length scales in large offshore wind farms
Effect of different source terms and inflow direction in atmospheric boundary modeling over the complex terrain site of Perdigão
Comparison of large eddy simulations against measurements from the Lillgrund offshore wind farm
Adjusted spectral correction method for calculating extreme winds in tropical-cyclone-affected water areas
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob K. Newsom, Colleen M. Kaul, Stefano Letizia, Mikhail Pekour, Nicholas Hamilton, Duli Chand, Donna Flynn, Nicola Bodini, and Patrick Moriarty
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 361–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-361-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-361-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how atmospheric phenomena affect the recovery of wind farm wake – the disturbed air behind turbines. In regions like Oklahoma, where wind farms are often clustered, understanding wake recovery is crucial. We found that wind farms can alter phenomena like low-level jets, which are common in Oklahoma, by deflecting them above the wind farm. As a result, the impact of wakes can be observed up to 1–2 km above ground level.
Daniela Moreno, Jan Friedrich, Matthias Wächter, Jörg Schwarte, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 347–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Unexpected load events measured on operating wind turbines are not accurately predicted by numerical simulations. We introduce the periods of constant wind speed as a possible cause of such events. We measure and characterize their statistics from atmospheric data. Further comparisons to standard modelled data and experimental turbulence data suggest that such events are not intrinsic to small-scale turbulence and are not accurately described by current standard wind models.
Farkhondeh (Hanie) Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 143–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In wind energy, precise wind speed prediction at hub height is vital. Our study in the Dutch North Sea reveals that the on-site-trained random forest model outperforms the global reanalysis data, ERA5, in accuracy and precision. Trained within a 200 km range, the model effectively extends the wind speed vertically but experiences bias. It also outperforms ERA5 corrected with measurements in capturing wind speed variations and fine wind patterns, highlighting its potential for site assessment.
Daphne Quint, Julie K. Lundquist, and David Rosencrans
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 117–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Offshore wind farms will be built along the East Coast of the United States. Low-level jets (LLJs) – layers of fast winds at low altitudes – also occur here. LLJs provide wind resources and also influence moisture and pollution transport, so it is important to understand how they might change. We develop and validate an automated tool to detect LLJs and compare 1 year of simulations with and without wind farms. Here, we describe LLJ characteristics and how they change with wind farms.
Alfredo Peña, Ginka G. Yankova, and Vasiliki Mallini
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 83–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Lidars are vastly used in wind energy, but most users struggle when interpreting lidar turbulence measures. Here, we explain the difficulty in converting them into standard measurements. We show two ways of converting lidar to in situ turbulence measurements, both using neural networks: one of them is based on physics, while the other is purely data-driven. They show promising results when compared to high-quality turbulence measurements from a tall mast.
Sebastiano Stipa, Arjun Ajay, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2301–2332, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2301-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2301-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents the actuator farm model, a new method for modeling wind turbines within large wind farms. The model greatly reduces computational cost when compared to traditional actuator wind turbine models and is beneficial for studying flow around large wind farms as well as the interaction between multiple wind farms. Results obtained from numerical simulations show excellent agreement with past wind turbine models, demonstrating its utility for future large-scale wind farm simulations.
Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2217–2233, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2217-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2217-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Offshore wind measurements are often affected by gaps. We investigated how these gaps affect wind resource assessments and whether filling them reduces their effect. We find that the effect of gaps on the estimated long-term wind resource is lower than expected and that data gap filling does not significantly change the outcome. These results indicate a need to reduce current wind data availability requirements for offshore measurement campaigns.
Gus Jeans
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2001–2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2001-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2001-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
An extensive set of met mast data offshore northwestern Europe are used to reduce uncertainty in offshore wind speed and turbulence intensity. The performance of widely used industry standard relationships is quantified, while some new empirical relationships are derived for practical application. Motivations include encouraging appropriate convergence of traditionally separate technical disciplines within the rapidly growing offshore wind energy industry.
Ali Khanjari, Asim Feroz, and Cristina Archer
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-128, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-128, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines add turbulence to the atmosphere behind them, especially 4–6 diameters downstream and near the rotor top. We propose an equation that predicts the distribution of added turbulence as a function of a turbine parameter (thrust coefficient) and an atmospheric parameter (undisturbed turbulence intensity before the turbine). We find that our equation performs well, although not perfectly. Eventually this equation can be used to better understand how wind turbines affect the atmosphere.
Maarten Paul van der Laan, Mark Kelly, Mads Baungaard, Antariksh Dicholkar, and Emily Louise Hodgson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1985–2000, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1985-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1985-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines are increasing in size and operate more frequently above the atmospheric surface layer, which requires improved inflow models for numerical simulations of turbine interaction. In this work, a novel steady-state model of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) is introduced. Numerical wind turbine flow simulations subjected to shallow and tall ABLs are conducted, and the proposed model shows improved performance compared to other state-of-the-art steady-state models.
Rachel Robey and Julie K. Lundquist
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1905–1922, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1905-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1905-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of wind turbine wakes with scanning lidar instruments contain complex errors. We model lidars in a simulated environment to understand how and why the measured wake may differ from the true wake and validate the results with observational data. The lidar smooths out the wake, making it seem more spread out and the slowdown of the winds less pronounced. Our findings provide insights into best practices for accurately measuring wakes with lidar and interpreting observational data.
Etienne Cheynet, Jan Markus Diezel, Hilde Haakenstad, Øyvind Breivik, Alfredo Peña, and Joachim Reuder
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-119, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-119, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study aims to help future large offshore wind turbines and airborne wind energy systems by providing insights into wind speeds at much higher altitudes than previously examined. We assessed three wind models (ERA5, NORA3, and NEWA) to predict wind speeds up to 500 m. Using lidar data from Norway and the North Sea, we found that ERA5 excels offshore, while NORA3 performs best onshore. However, the performance of the models depends on the locations and the evaluation criteria.
Jonathan D. Rogers
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1849–1868, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1849-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1849-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the results of a flight experiment to assess the existence of potential safety risks to a general aviation aircraft from added turbulence in the wake of a wind turbine. A general aviation aircraft was flown through the wake of an operating wind turbine at different downwind distances. Results indicated that there were small increases in disturbances to the aircraft due to added turbulence in the wake, but they never approached levels that would pose a safety risk.
Rémi Gandoin and Jorge Garza
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1727–1745, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1727-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1727-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
ERA5 has become the workhorse of most wind resource assessment applications, as it compares better with in situ measurements than other reanalyses. However, for design purposes, ERA5 suffers from a drawback: it underestimates strong wind speeds offshore (approx. from 10 m s−1). This is not widely discussed in the scientific literature. We address this bias and proposes a simple, robust correction. This article supports the growing need for use-case-specific validations of reanalysis datasets.
Lukas Vollmer, Balthazar Arnoldus Maria Sengers, and Martin Dörenkämper
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1689–1693, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1689-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1689-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study proposes a modification to a well-established wind farm parameterization used in mesoscale models. The wind speed at the location of the turbine, which is used to calculate power and thrust, is corrected to approximate the free wind speed. Results show that the modified parameterization produces more accurate estimates of the turbine’s power curve.
Mostafa Bakhoday Paskyabi
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1631–1645, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1631-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1631-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The exchange of momentum and energy between the atmosphere and ocean depends on air–sea processes, especially wave-related ones. Precision in representing these interactions is vital for offshore wind turbine and farm design and operation. The development of a reliable wave–turbulence decomposition method to remove wave-induced interference from single-height wind measurements is essential for these applications and enhances our grasp of wind coherence within the wave boundary layer.
Mark Kelly
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-69, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-69, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Industrial standards for wind turbine design are based on 10-minute statistics of wind speed at turbine hub-height, treating fluctuations as turbulence. But recent work shows the effect of strong transients is described by flow accelerations. We devise a method to measure the accelerations turbines encounter; the extremes offshore defy 10-minute statistics, due to various phenomena beyond turbulence. These findings are translated into a recipe supporting statistical turbine design.
Cássia Maria Leme Beu and Eduardo Landulfo
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1431–1450, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1431-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1431-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Extrapolating the wind profile for complex terrain through the long short-term memory model outperformed the traditional power law methodology, which due to its universal nature cannot capture local features as the machine-learning methodology does. Moreover, considering the importance of investigating the wind potential and the need for alternative energy sources, it is motivating to find that a short observational campaign can produce better results than the traditional techniques.
Daniel R. Houck, Nathaniel B. de Velder, David C. Maniaci, and Brent C. Houchens
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1189–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1189-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1189-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Experiments offer incredible value to science, but results must come with an uncertainty quantification to be meaningful. We present a method to simulate a proposed experiment, calculate uncertainties, and determine the measurement duration (total time of measurements) and the experiment duration (total time to collect the required measurement data when including condition variability and time when measurement is not occurring) required to produce statistically significant and converged results.
Oscar García-Santiago, Andrea N. Hahmann, Jake Badger, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 963–979, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares the results of two wind farm parameterizations (WFPs) in the Weather Research and Forecasting model, simulating a two-turbine array under three atmospheric stabilities with large-eddy simulations. We show that the WFPs accurately depict wind speeds either near turbines or in the far-wake areas, but not both. The parameterizations’ performance varies by variable (wind speed or turbulent kinetic energy) and atmospheric stability, with reduced accuracy in stable conditions.
Til Kristian Vrana and Harald G. Svendsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 919–932, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-919-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-919-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed new ways to plot comprehensive wind resource maps that show the revenue potential of different locations for future wind power developments. The relative capacity factor is introduced as an indicator showing the expected mean power output. The market value factor is introduced, which captures the expected mean market value relative to other wind parks. The Renewable Energy Complementarity (RECom) index combines the two into a single index, resulting in the RECom map.
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Ville Vakkari, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 821–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Knowing the wind speed across the rotor of a wind turbine is key in making good predictions of the power production. However, models struggle to capture both the speed and the shape of the wind profile. Using machine learning methods based on the model data, we show that the predictions can be improved drastically. The work focuses on three coastal sites, spread over the Northern Hemisphere (the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, and the US Atlantic coast) with similar results for all sites.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, William I. Gustafson Jr., Ye Liu, Brian J. Gaudet, Nicola Bodini, Rob K. Newsom, and Mikhail Pekour
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 741–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In 2020, lidar-mounted buoys owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE) were deployed off the California coast in two wind energy lease areas and provided valuable year-long analyses of offshore low-level jet (LLJ) characteristics at heights relevant to wind turbines. In addition to the LLJ climatology, this work provides validation of LLJ representation in atmospheric models that are essential for assessing the potential energy yield of offshore wind farms.
Eliot Quon
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 495–518, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Engineering models used to design wind farms generally do not account for realistic atmospheric conditions that can rapidly evolve from minute to minute. This paper uses a first-principles simulation technique to predict the performance of five wind turbines during a wind farm control experiment. Challenges included limited observations and atypical conditions. The simulation accurately predicts the aerodynamics of a turbine when it is situated partially within the wake of an upstream turbine.
Lars Neuhaus, Matthias Wächter, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 439–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-439-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-439-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Future wind turbines reach unprecedented heights and are affected by wind conditions that have not yet been studied in detail. With increasing height, a transition to laminar conditions with a turbulent–non-turbulent interface (TNTI) becomes more likely. In this paper, the presence and fractality of this TNTI in the atmosphere are studied. Typical fractalities known from ideal laboratory and numerical studies and a frequent occurrence of the TNTI at heights of multi-megawatt turbines are found.
Sebastiano Stipa, Arjun Ajay, Dries Allaerts, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 297–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-297-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In the current study, we introduce TOSCA (Toolbox fOr Stratified Convective Atmospheres), an open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool, and demonstrate its capabilities by simulating the flow around a large wind farm, operating in realistic flow conditions. This is one of the grand challenges of the present decade and can yield better insight into physical phenomena that strongly affect wind farm operation but which are not yet fully understood.
Rebecca Foody, Jacob Coburn, Jeanie A. Aird, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, and Sara C. Pryor
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 263–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using lidar-derived wind speed measurements at approx. 150 m height at onshore and offshore locations, we quantify the advantages of deploying wind turbines offshore in terms of the amount of electrical power produced and the higher reliability and predictability of the electrical power.
Ronald B. Smith
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 253–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-253-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-253-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recent papers have investigated the impact of turbine drag on local wind patterns, but these studies have not given a full explanation of the induced pressure field. The pressure field blocks and deflects the wind and in other ways modifies farm efficiency. Current gravity wave models are complex and provide no estimation tools. We dig deeper into the cause of the pressure field and provide approximate closed-form expressions for pressure field effects.
Cédric Raibaudo, Jean-Christophe Gilloteaux, and Laurent Perret
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1711–1725, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1711-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1711-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The work presented here proposes interfacing experimental measurements performed in a wind tunnel with simulations conducted with the aeroelastic code FAST and applied to a floating wind turbine model under wave-induced motion. FAST simulations using experiments match well with those obtained using the inflow generation method provided by TurbSim. The highest surge motion frequencies show a significant decrease in the mean power produced by the turbine and a mitigation of the flow dynamics.
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1651–1658, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1651-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1651-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Low-level jets (LLJs) are special types of non-ideal wind profiles affecting both wind energy production and loads on a wind turbine. However, among LLJ researchers, there is no consensus regarding which definition to use to identify these profiles. In this work, we compare two different ways of identifying the LLJ – the falloff definition and the shear definition – and argue why the shear definition is better suited to wind energy applications.
Serkan Kartal, Sukanta Basu, and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1533–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1533-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1533-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Peak wind gust is a crucial meteorological variable for wind farm planning and operations. Unfortunately, many wind farms do not have on-site measurements of it. In this paper, we propose a machine-learning approach (called INTRIGUE, decIsioN-TRee-based wInd GUst Estimation) that utilizes numerous inputs from a public-domain reanalysis dataset, generating long-term, site-specific peak wind gust series.
Nikolas Angelou, Jakob Mann, and Camille Dubreuil-Boisclair
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1511–1531, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1511-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1511-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents the first experimental investigation using two nacelle-mounted wind lidars that reveal the upwind and downwind conditions relative to a full-scale floating wind turbine. We find that in the case of floating wind turbines with small pitch and roll oscillating motions (< 1°), the ambient turbulence is the main driving factor that determines the propagation of the wake characteristics.
Julian Quick, Pierre-Elouan Rethore, Mads Mølgaard Pedersen, Rafael Valotta Rodrigues, and Mikkel Friis-Møller
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1235–1250, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1235-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1235-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine positions are often optimized to avoid wake losses. These losses depend on atmospheric conditions, such as the wind speed and direction. The typical optimization scheme involves discretizing the atmospheric inputs, then considering every possible set of these discretized inputs in every optimization iteration. This work presents stochastic gradient descent (SGD) as an alternative, which randomly samples the atmospheric conditions during every optimization iteration.
Sarah J. Ollier and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1179–1200, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1179-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1179-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This modelling study shows that topographic trapped lee waves (TLWs) modify flow behaviour and power output in offshore wind farms. We demonstrate that TLWs can substantially alter the wind speeds at individual wind turbines and effect the power output of the turbine and whole wind farm. The impact on wind speeds and power is dependent on which part of the TLW wave cycle interacts with the wind turbines and wind farm. Positive and negative impacts of TLWs on power output are observed.
Khaled Yassin, Arne Helms, Daniela Moreno, Hassan Kassem, Leo Höning, and Laura J. Lukassen
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1133–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The current turbulent wind field models stated in the IEC 61400-1 standard underestimate the probability of extreme changes in wind velocity. This underestimation can lead to the false calculation of extreme and fatigue loads on the turbine. In this work, we are trying to apply a random time-mapping technique to one of the standard turbulence models to adapt to such extreme changes. The turbulent fields generated are compared with a standard wind field to show the effects of this new mapping.
Mark Kelly and Maarten Paul van der Laan
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 975–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-975-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-975-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The turning of the wind with height, which is known as veer, can affect wind turbine performance. Thus far meteorology has only given idealized descriptions of veer, which has not yet been related in a way readily usable for wind energy. Here we derive equations for veer in terms of meteorological quantities and provide practically usable forms in terms of measurable shear (change in wind speed with height). Flow simulations and measurements at turbine heights support these developments.
Moritz Gräfe, Vasilis Pettas, Julia Gottschall, and Po Wen Cheng
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 925–946, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-925-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-925-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Inflow wind field measurements from nacelle-based lidar systems offer great potential for different applications including turbine control, load validation and power performance measurements. On floating wind turbines nacelle-based lidar measurements are affected by the dynamic behavior of the floating foundations. Therefore, the effects on lidar wind speed measurements induced by floater dynamics must be well understood. A new model for quantification of these effects is introduced in our work.
Robin Marcille, Maxime Thiébaut, Pierre Tandeo, and Jean-François Filipot
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 771–786, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-771-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-771-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A novel data-driven method is proposed to design an optimal sensor network for the reconstruction of offshore wind resources. Based on unsupervised learning of numerical weather prediction wind data, it provides a simple yet efficient method for the siting of sensors, outperforming state-of-the-art methods for this application. It is applied in the main French offshore wind energy development areas to provide guidelines for the deployment of floating lidars for wind resource assessment.
Wei Fu, Alessandro Sebastiani, Alfredo Peña, and Jakob Mann
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 677–690, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-677-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-677-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Nacelle lidars with different beam scanning locations and two types of systems are considered for inflow turbulence estimations using both numerical simulations and field measurements. The turbulence estimates from a sonic anemometer at the hub height of a Vestas V52 turbine are used as references. The turbulence parameters are retrieved using the radial variances and a least-squares procedure. The findings from numerical simulations have been verified by the analysis of the field measurements.
Daniel Hatfield, Charlotte Bay Hasager, and Ioanna Karagali
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 621–637, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-621-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-621-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wind observations at heights relevant to the operation of modern offshore wind farms, i.e. 100 m and more, are required to optimize their positioning and layout. Satellite wind retrievals provide observations of the wind field over large spatial areas and extensive time periods, yet their temporal resolution is limited and they are only representative at 10 m height. Machine-learning models are applied to lift these satellite winds to higher heights, directly relevant to wind energy purposes.
Anna von Brandis, Gabriele Centurelli, Jonas Schmidt, Lukas Vollmer, Bughsin' Djath, and Martin Dörenkämper
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 589–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-589-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-589-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We propose that considering large-scale wind direction changes in the computation of wind farm cluster wakes is of high relevance. Consequently, we present a new solution for engineering modeling tools that accounts for the effect of such changes in the propagation of wakes. The new model is evaluated with satellite data in the German Bight area. It has the potential to reduce uncertainty in applications such as site assessment and short-term power forecasting.
Oliver Maas
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 535–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study compares small vs. large wind farms regarding the flow and power output with a turbulence-resolving simulation model. It shows that a large wind farm (90 km length) significantly affects the wind direction and that the wind speed is higher in the large wind farm wake. Both wind farms excite atmospheric gravity waves that also affect the power output of the wind farms.
Regis Thedin, Eliot Quon, Matthew Churchfield, and Paul Veers
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 487–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-487-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-487-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate coherence and correlation and highlight their importance for disciplines like wind energy structural dynamic analysis, in which blade loading and fatigue depend on turbulence structure. We compare coherence estimates to those computed using a model suggested by international standards. We show the differences and highlight additional information that can be gained using large-eddy simulation, further improving analytical coherence models used in synthetic turbulence generators.
Sheng-Lun Tai, Larry K. Berg, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob Newsom, and Anthony Kirincich
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 433–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-433-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-433-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Turbulence intensity is critical for wind turbine design and operation as it affects wind power generation efficiency. Turbulence measurements in the marine environment are limited. We use a model to derive turbulence intensity and test how sea surface temperature data may impact the simulated turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability. The model slightly underestimates turbulence, and improved sea surface temperature data reduce the bias. Error with unrealistic mesoscale flow is identified.
Brandon Arthur Lobo, Özge Sinem Özçakmak, Helge Aagaard Madsen, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, Michael Breuer, and Niels N. Sørensen
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 303–326, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-303-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-303-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Results from the DAN-AERO and aerodynamic glove projects provide significant findings. The effects of inflow turbulence on transition and wind turbine blades are compared to computational fluid dynamic simulations. It is found that the transition scenario changes even over a single revolution. The importance of a suitable choice of amplification factor is evident from the simulations. An agreement between the power spectral density plots from the experiment and large-eddy simulations is seen.
Frédéric Blondel
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 141–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-141-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-141-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate wind farm flow predictions based on analytical wake models are crucial for wind farm design and layout optimization. Wake superposition methods play a key role and remain a substantial source of uncertainty. In the present work, a momentum-conserving superposition method is extended to the superposition of super-Gaussian-type velocity deficit models, allowing the full wake velocity deficit estimation and design of closely packed wind farms.
Abdul Haseeb Syed, Jakob Mann, Andreas Platis, and Jens Bange
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 125–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-125-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-125-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines extract energy from the incoming wind flow, which needs to be recovered. In very large offshore wind farms, the energy is recovered mostly from above the wind farm in a process called entrainment. In this study, we analyzed the effect of atmospheric stability on the entrainment process in large offshore wind farms using measurements recorded by a research aircraft. This is the first time that in situ measurements are used to study the energy recovery process above wind farms.
Kartik Venkatraman, Trond-Ola Hågbo, Sophia Buckingham, and Knut Erik Teigen Giljarhus
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 85–108, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-85-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-85-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is focused on the impact of modeling different effects, such as forest canopy and Coriolis forces, on the wind resource over a complex terrain site located near Perdigão, Portugal. A numerical model is set up and results are compared with field measurements. The results show that including a forest canopy improves the predictions close to the ground at some locations on the site, while the model with inflow from a precursor performed better at other locations.
Ishaan Sood, Elliot Simon, Athanasios Vitsas, Bart Blockmans, Gunner C. Larsen, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2469–2489, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2469-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we conduct a validation study to compare a numerical solver against measurements obtained from the offshore Lillgrund wind farm. By reusing a previously developed inflow turbulent dataset, the atmospheric conditions at the wind farm were recreated, and the general performance trends of the turbines were captured well. The work increases the reliability of numerical wind farm solvers while highlighting the challenges of accurately representing large wind farms using such solvers.
Xiaoli Guo Larsén and Søren Ott
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2457–2468, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2457-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2457-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A method is developed for calculating the extreme wind in tropical-cyclone-affected water areas. The method is based on the spectral correction method that fills in the missing wind variability to the modeled time series, guided by best track data. The paper provides a detailed recipe for applying the method and the 50-year winds of equivalent 10 min temporal resolution from 10 to 150 m in several tropical-cyclone-affected regions.
Cited articles
Andrade, J. R. and Bessa, R. J.: Improving renewable energy forecasting with a grid of numerical weather predictions, IEEE T. Sustain. Energ., 8, 1571–1580, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2694340, 2017. a
Annoni, J., Bay, C., Taylor, T., Pao, L., Fleming, P., and Johnson, K.: Efficient optimization of large wind farms for real-time control, in: 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), Milwaukee, 27–29 June 2018, 6200–6205, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2018.8430751, 2018a. a
Annoni, J., Fleming, P., Scholbrock, A., Roadman, J., Dana, S., Adcock, C., Porte-Agel, F., Raach, S., Haizmann, F., and Schlipf, D.: Analysis of control-oriented wake modeling tools using lidar field results, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 819–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-819-2018, 2018b. a
Annoni, J., Dall'Anese, E., Hong, M., and Bay, C. J.: Efficient distributed optimization of wind farms using proximal primal-dual algorithms, 2019 American Control Conference, Philadelphia, USA, 10–12 July 2019, 4173–4178, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2019.8814655, 2019b. a
Bao, L., Gneiting, T., Grimit, E. P., Guttorp, P., and Raftery, A. E.: Bias correction and Bayesian model averaging for ensemble forecasts of surface wind direction, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 1811–1821, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3138.1, 2010. a
Barthelmie, R. J., Wang, H., Doubrawa, P., and Pryor, S.: Best Practice for Measuring Wind Speeds and Turbulence Offshore through In-Situ and Remote Sensing Technologies, Technical report, Cornell University, Upson Hall, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.7298/X4QV3JGF, 2016. a
Bay, C. J., Annoni, J., Taylor, T., Pao, L., and Johnson, K.: Active power control for wind farms using distributed model predictive control and nearest neighbor communication, in: 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 8–10 June 2022, 682–687, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2018.8431764, 2018. a
Bernardoni, F., Ciri, U., Rotea, M., and Leonardi, S.: Real-time identification of clusters of turbines, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1618, 022032, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/2/022032, 2020. a
Bernardoni, F., Ciri, U., Rotea, M. A., and Leonardi, S.: Identification of turbine clusters during time varying wind direction, in: 2022 American Control Conference (ACC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 8–10 June 2022, 4236–4241, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC53348.2022.9867223, 2022. a, b
Bivona, S., Bonanno, G., Burlon, R., Gurrera, D., and Leone, C.: Stochastic models for wind speed forecasting, Energy conversion and management, 52, 1157–1165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.010, 2011. a
Boersma, S.: Towards closed-loop dynamical wind farm control: model development and control applications, PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:48572080-bc51-4ffe-9ba5-676ee9ab5fcc, 2019. a, b
Boersma, S., Doekemeijer, B. M., Gebraad, P. M., Fleming, P. A., Annoni, J., Scholbrock, A. K., Frederik, J. A., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: A tutorial on control-oriented modeling and control of wind farms, in: 2017 American control conference (ACC), 1–18, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2017.7962923, 2017. a, b
Bossanyi, E.: Combining induction control and wake steering for wind farm energy and fatigue loads optimisation, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1037, 032011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/3/032011, 2018. a, b
Bossanyi, E. and Ruisi, R.: Axial induction controller field test at Sedini wind farm, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 389–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-389-2021, 2021. a
Breedt, H. J., Craig, K. J., and Jothiprakasam, V. D.: Monin-Obukhov similarity theory and its application to wind flow modelling over complex terrain, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 182, 308–321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.026, 2018. a
Calaf, M., Meneveau, C., and Meyers, J.: Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers, Phys. Fluids, 22, 015110, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3291077, 2010. a
Campagnolo, F., Weber, R., Schreiber, J., and Bottasso, C. L.: Wind tunnel testing of wake steering with dynamic wind direction changes, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1273–1295, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1273-2020, 2020. a
Cardaun, M., Roscher, B., Schelenz, R., and Jacobs, G.: Analysis of wind-turbine main bearing loads due to constant yaw misalignments over a 20 years timespan, Energies, 12, 1768, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091768, 2019. a
Carvalho, D., Rocha, A., Gómez-Gesteira, M., and Santos, C.: A sensitivity study of the WRF model in wind simulation for an area of high wind energy, Environ. Modell. Softw., 33, 23–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.019, 2012. a, b
Chan, P. and Hon, K.: Performance of super high resolution numerical weather prediction model in forecasting terrain-disrupted airflow at the Hong Kong International Airport: case studies, Meteorol. Appl., 23, 101–114, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1534, 2016. a
Chatterjee, T., Cherukuru, N. W., Peet, Y. T., and Calhoun, R. J.: Large eddy simulation with realistic geophysical inflow of Alpha Ventus wind farm: a comparison with LIDAR field experiments, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1037, 072056, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072056, 2018. a, b, c, d
Chen, W., Liu, H., Lin, Y., Li, W., Sun, Y., and Zhang, D.: LSTM-NN yaw control of wind turbines based on upstream wind information, Energies, 13, 1482, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061482, 2020. a, b, c
Chen, W., Qian, G., Qi, W., Luo, G., Zhao, L., and Yuan, X.: Layout Method of Met Mast Based on Macro Zoning and Micro Quantitative Siting in a Wind Farm, Processes, 10, 1708, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091708, 2022. a
Chitsazan, M. A., Fadali, M. S., and Trzynadlowski, A. M.: Wind speed and wind direction forecasting using echo state network with nonlinear functions, Renew. Energ., 131, 879–889, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.060, 2019. a
Coleman, J. and Law, K.: Meteorology, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09492-6, 2015. a, b, c
Cortina, G., Sharma, V., and Calaf, M.: Investigation of the incoming wind vector for improved wind turbine yaw-adjustment under different atmospheric and wind farm conditions, Renew. Energ., 101, 376–386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.011, 2017. a
Cremers, J. and Klugkist, I.: One direction? A tutorial for circular data analysis using R with examples in cognitive psychology, Front. Psychol., 9, 2040, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02040, 2018. a
Damiani, R., Dana, S., Annoni, J., Fleming, P., Roadman, J., van Dam, J., and Dykes, K.: Assessment of wind turbine component loads under yaw-offset conditions, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 173–189, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-173-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Davies, B. M. and Thomson, D. J.: Comparisons of some parametrizations of wind direction variability with observations, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4909–4917, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00287-3, 1999. a, b, c, d
Doekemeijer, B. M., Boersma, S., Pao, L. Y., Knudsen, T., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Online model calibration for a simplified LES model in pursuit of real-time closed-loop wind farm control, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 749–765, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-749-2018, 2018. a
Dong, L., Lio, W. H., and Simley, E.: On turbulence models and lidar measurements for wind turbine control, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1491–1500, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1491-2021, 2021. a
Draper, M., Guggeri, A., López, B., Díaz, A., Campagnolo, F., and Usera, G.: A Large Eddy Simulation framework to assess wind farm power maximization strategies: Validation of maximization by yawing, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1037, 072051, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072051, 2018. a
Draxl, C., Allaerts, D., Quon, E., and Churchfield, M.: Coupling mesoscale budget components to large-eddy simulations for wind-energy applications, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 179, 73–98, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00584-z, 2021. a, b
Eecen, P., Wagenaar, J., Stefanatos, N., Pedersen, T. F., Wagner, R., and Hansen, K. S.: UPWIND 1A2 Metrology, Final Report, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/upwind-1a2-metrology-final-report (last access: 26 August 2022), 2011. a
El-Fouly, T. H., El-Saadany, E. F., and Salama, M. M.: One day ahead prediction of wind speed and direction, IEEE T. Energy Conver., 23, 191–201, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2007.905069, 2008. a
Energy, S. G. R.: Onshore product portfolio, Brochure, https://www.siemensgamesa.com/en-int/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/products-and-services/onshore/brochures/siemens-gamesa-onshore-product-portfolio-en.pdf (last access: 16 September 2022), 2022. a
Erdem, E. and Shi, J.: ARMA based approaches for forecasting the tuple of wind speed and direction, Appl. Energ., 88, 1405–1414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.031, 2011. a
Etling, D.: On plume meandering under stable stratification, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen., 24, 1979–1985, https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90232-C, 1990. a
Farret, F. A., Pfitscher, L. L., and Bernardon, D. P.: Sensorless active yaw control for wind turbines, in: IECON'01. 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Cat. No. 37243), vol. 2, Denver, Colorado, USA, 29 November–2 December, 1370–1375, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2001.975981, 2001. a
Farrugia, P. S. and Micallef, A.: Vectorial statistics for the standard deviation of wind direction, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 129, 495–506, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-016-0483-8, 2017. a
Farrugia, P. S., Borg, J. L., and Micallef, A.: On the algorithms used to compute the standard deviation of wind direction, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 2144–2151, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2050.1, 2009. a, b
Feijóo, A. and Villanueva, D.: Contributions to wind farm power estimation considering wind direction-dependent wake effects, Wind Energy, 20, 221–231, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2002, 2017. a
Fisher, N. and Lee, A.: Time series analysis of circular data, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 56, 327–339, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1994.tb01981.x, 1994. a
Fisher, N. I.: Statistical analysis of circular data, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511564345, 1995. a
Fleming, P., Gebraad, P. M., Lee, S., van Wingerden, J.-W., Johnson, K., Churchfield, M., Michalakes, J., Spalart, P., and Moriarty, P.: Simulation comparison of wake mitigation control strategies for a two-turbine case, Wind Energy, 18, 2135–2143, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1810, 2015. a
Fleming, P., Churchfield, M., Scholbrock, A., Clifton, A., Schreck, S., Johnson, K., Wright, A., Gebraad, P., Annoni, J., Naughton, B., Berg, J., Herges, T., White, J., Mikkelsen, T., Sjöholm, M., and Angelou, N.: Detailed field test of yaw-based wake steering, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 753, 052003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/5/052003, 2016. a
Fleming, P., Annoni, J., Shah, J. J., Wang, L., Ananthan, S., Zhang, Z., Hutchings, K., Wang, P., Chen, W., and Chen, L.: Field test of wake steering at an offshore wind farm, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 229–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-229-2017, 2017. a
Fleming, P., King, J., Dykes, K., Simley, E., Roadman, J., Scholbrock, A., Murphy, P., Lundquist, J. K., Moriarty, P., Fleming, K., van Dam, J., Bay, C., Mudafort, R., Lopez, H., Skopek, J., Scott, M., Ryan, B., Guernsey, C., and Brake, D.: Initial results from a field campaign of wake steering applied at a commercial wind farm – Part 1, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 273–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-273-2019, 2019. a, b
Fleming, P. A., Gebraad, P. M., Lee, S., van Wingerden, J.-W., Johnson, K., Churchfield, M., Michalakes, J., Spalart, P., and Moriarty, P.: Evaluating techniques for redirecting turbine wakes using SOWFA, Renew. Energ., 70, 211–218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.015, 2014a. a
Fleming, P. A., Scholbrock, A., Jehu, A., Davoust, S., Osler, E., Wright, A. D., and Clifton, A.: Field-test results using a nacelle-mounted lidar for improving wind turbine power capture by reducing yaw misalignment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 524, 012002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012002, 2014b. a, b
Gebraad, P. M., Teeuwisse, F., van Wingerden, J.-W., Fleming, P. A., Ruben, S. D., Marden, J. R., and Pao, L. Y.: A data-driven model for wind plant power optimization by yaw control, in: 2014 American Control Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 4–6 June 2014, 3128–3134, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2014.6859118, 2014. a
Gebraad, P. M., Teeuwisse, F., Van Wingerden, J., Fleming, P. A., Ruben, S., Marden, J., and Pao, L.: Wind plant power optimization through yaw control using a parametric model for wake effects – a CFD simulation study, Wind Energy, 19, 95–114, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1822, 2016. a, b
Goit, J. P., Munters, W., and Meyers, J.: Optimal coordinated control of power extraction in LES of a wind farm with entrance effects, Energies, 9, 29, https://doi.org/10.3390/en9010029, 2016. a
Hanna, S.: Lateral dispersion in light-wind stable conditions, Il Nuovo Cimento C, 13, 889–894, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514777, 1990. a, b
Hans, A. P. and Jhon, A.: Atmospheric turbulence, models and methods for engineering applications, Willy, New York, ISBN 0471057142, 1984. a
Hart, E., Stock, A., Elderfield, G., Elliott, R., Brasseur, J., Keller, J., Guo, Y., and Song, W.: Impacts of wind field characteristics and non-steady deterministic wind events on time-varying main-bearing loads, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1209–1226, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1209-2022, 2022. a
Hau, E.: Wind turbines: fundamentals, technologies, application, economics, Springer Science & Business Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27151-9, 2013. a
Haupt, S., Berg, L., Anderson, A., Brown, B., Churchfield, M., Draxl, C., Ennis, B., Feng, Y., Kosovic, B., Kotamarthi, V., Linn, R., Mirocha, J., Moriarty, P., Muñoz-Esparza, D., Rai, K., and Shaw, W.: First year report of the a2e mesoscale to microscale coupling project, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Tech. Report PNNL-25108, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21572.01927, 2015. a
Haupt, S., Berg, L., Churchfield, M., Kosovic, B., Mirocha, J., and Shaw, W.: Mesoscale to microscale coupling for wind energy applications: Addressing the challenges, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1452, 012076, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012076, 2020. a, b, c
Haupt, S. E., Kotamarthi, R., Feng, Y., Mirocha, J. D., Koo, E., Linn, R., Kosovic, B., Brown, B., Anderson, A., Churchfield, M. J., Draxl, C., Quon, E., Shaw, W. J., Berg, L. K., Rai, R. K., and Ennis, B. L.: Second year report of the atmosphere to electrons mesoscale to microscale coupling project: Nonstationary modeling techniques and assessment, Tech. rep., Pacific Northwest National Lab.(PNNL), Richland, WA (United States), https://doi.org/10.2172/1573811, 2017. a, b, c, d
Haupt, S. E., Kosovic, B., Shaw, W., Berg, L. K., Churchfield, M., Cline, J., Draxl, C., Ennis, B., Koo, E., Kotamarthi, R., Mazzaro, L., Mirocha, J., Moriarty, P., Muñoz-Esparza, D., Quon, E., Rai, R. K., Robinson, M., and Sever, G.: On bridging a modeling scale gap: Mesoscale to microscale coupling for wind energy, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 2533–2550, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0033.1, 2019. a, b
Heck, K. S., Johlas, H. M., and Howland, M. F.: Modelling the induction, thrust and power of a yaw-misaligned actuator disk, J. Fluid Mech., 959, A9, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2023.129, 2023. a, b
Hirata, Y., Mandic, D. P., Suzuki, H., and Aihara, K.: Wind direction modelling using multiple observation points, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 366, 591–607, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2112, 2008. a, b
Houck, D. R.: Review of wake management techniques for wind turbines, Wind Energy, 25, 195–220, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2668, 2022. a
Howland, M. F.: Wind farm yaw control set-point optimization under model parameter uncertainty, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 13, 043303, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0051071, 2021. a
Howland, M. F., Lele, S. K., and Dabiri, J. O.: Wind farm power optimization through wake steering, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 14495–14500, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903680116, 2019. a
Howland, M. F., González, C. M., Martínez, J. J. P., Quesada, J. B., Larranaga, F. P., Yadav, N. K., Chawla, J. S., and Dabiri, J. O.: Influence of atmospheric conditions on the power production of utility-scale wind turbines in yaw misalignment, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 12, 063307, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023746, 2020. a, b, c, d, e
Howland, M. F., Ghate, A. S., Quesada, J. B., Pena Martínez, J. J., Zhong, W., Larrañaga, F. P., Lele, S. K., and Dabiri, J. O.: Optimal closed-loop wake steering – Part 2: Diurnal cycle atmospheric boundary layer conditions, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 345–365, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-345-2022, 2022a. a, b, c
Howland, M. F., Quesada, J. B., Martínez, J. J. P., Larrañaga, F. P., Yadav, N., Chawla, J. S., Sivaram, V., and Dabiri, J. O.: Collective wind farm operation based on a predictive model increases utility-scale energy production, Nature Energy, 7, 818–827, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01085-8, 2022b. a
Jammalamadaka, S. R. and SenGupta, A.: Topics in circular statistics, vol. 5, World Scientific, https://doi.org/10.1142/4031, 2001. a, b
Jiménez, P. A. and Dudhia, J.: On the ability of the WRF model to reproduce the surface wind direction over complex terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 52, 1610–1617, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0266.1, 2013. a, b, c
Joffre, S. M. and Laurila, T.: Standard deviations of wind speed and direction from observations over a smooth surface, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 27, 550–561, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1988)027<0550:SDOWSA>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a, b, c
Karakasis, N., Mesemanolis, A., Nalmpantis, T., and Mademlis, C.: Active yaw control in a horizontal axis wind system without requiring wind direction measurement, IET Renew. Power Gen., 10, 1441–1449, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0005, 2016. a, b
Karami, F., Zhang, Y., Rotea, M. A., Bernardoni, F., and Leonardi, S.: Real-time Wind Direction Estimation using Machine Learning on Operational Wind Farm Data, in: 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Virtual conference, 13–15 December 2021, 2456–2461, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC45484.2021.9683613, 2021. a
Kau, W., Lee, H., and Kao, S.: A statistical model for wind prediction at a mountain and valley station near Anderson Creek, California, J. Appl. Meteorol., 21, 18–21, 1982. a
Kheirabadi, A. C. and Nagamune, R.: A quantitative review of wind farm control with the objective of wind farm power maximization, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 192, 45–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.015, 2019. a
Kheirabadi, A. C. and Nagamune, R.: A low-fidelity dynamic wind farm model for simulating time-varying wind conditions and floating platform motion, Ocean Eng., 234, 109313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109313, 2021. a
Kim, J. H.: Forecasting autoregressive time series with bias-corrected parameter estimators, Int. J. Forecasting, 19, 493–502, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(02)00062-6, 2003. a
Kim, M. and Dalhoff, P.: Yaw Systems for wind turbines–Overview of concepts, current challenges and design methods, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 524, 012086, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012086, 2014. a
Kooijman, H., Lindenburg, C., Winkelaar, D., and Van der Hooft, E.: DOWEC 6 MW Pre-Design: Aero-elastic modeling of the DOWEC 6 MW pre-design in PHATAS, DOWEC Dutch Offshore Wind Energy Converter 1997–2003 Public Reports, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b331d7f80401ca1058058f4d130c3246843a1989 (last access: 10 August 2022), 2003. a
Kragh, K. and Fleming, P.: Rotor speed dependent yaw control of wind turbines based on empirical data, in: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 9–12 January 2012, p. 1018, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1018, 2012. a, b, c, d
Kragh, K., Hansen, M., and Mikkelsen, T.: Improving yaw alignment using spinner based LIDAR, in: 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 4–7 January 2011, p. 264, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-264, 2011. a
Kragh, K. A. and Hansen, M. H.: Load alleviation of wind turbines by yaw misalignment, Wind Energy, 17, 971–982, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1612, 2014. a, b
Kragh, K. A. and Hansen, M. H.: Potential of power gain with improved yaw alignment, Wind Energy, 18, 979–989, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1739, 2015. a
Kragh, K. A., Hansen, M. H., and Mikkelsen, T.: Precision and shortcomings of yaw error estimation using spinner-based light detection and ranging, Wind Energy, 16, 353–366, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1492, 2013b. a, b
Kristensen, L., Jensen, N. O., and Petersen, E. L.: Lateral dispersion of pollutants in a very stable atmosphere – the effect of meandering, Atmos. Environ., 15, 837–844, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(81)90288-2, 1981. a
Krogstad, P.-Å. and Adaramola, M. S.: Performance and near wake measurements of a model horizontal axis wind turbine, Wind Energy, 15, 743–756, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.502, 2012. a, b
Larsen, G. C., Larsen, T. J., and Chougule, A.: Medium fidelity modelling of loads in wind farms under non-neutral ABL stability conditions – a full-scale validation study, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 854, 012026, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012026, 2017. a
Li, J.-Q. J., Yang, X. I., and Kunz, R. F.: Grid-point and time-step requirements for large-eddy simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes of stratified wakes, Phys. Fluids, 34, 115125, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0127487, 2022. a
Mahrt, L.: Mesoscale wind direction shifts in the stable boundary-layer, Tellus A, 60, 700–705, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00324.x, 2008. a
Mahrt, L.: Surface wind direction variability, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 50, 144–152, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2560.1, 2011. a, b, c, d
Mann, J.: Wind field simulation, Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 13, 269–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(97)00036-2, 1998. a
Mardia, K. V., Jupp, P. E., and Mardia, K.: Directional statistics, vol. 2, Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316979, 2000. a
Medici, D.: Experimental studies of wind turbine wakes: power optimisation and meandering, PhD thesis, KTH, https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-598 (last access: 9 March 2022), 2005. a
Mikkelsen, T., Hansen, K. H., Angelou, N., Sjöholm, M., Harris, M., Hadley, P., Scullion, R., Ellis, G., and Vives, G.: Lidar wind speed measurements from a rotating spinner, in: European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/4553836/Mikkelsen_EWEC_2010.pdf (last access: 23 August 2022), 2010. a, b
Mikkelsen, T., Angelou, N., Hansen, K., Sjöholm, M., Harris, M., Slinger, C., Hadley, P., Scullion, R., Ellis, G., and Vives, G.: A spinner-integrated wind lidar for enhanced wind turbine control, Wind Energy, 16, 625–643, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1564, 2013. a
Mirocha, J., Kosović, B., and Kirkil, G.: Resolved turbulence characteristics in large-eddy simulations nested within mesoscale simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 806–831, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00064.1, 2014. a
Muñoz-Esparza, D. and Kosović, B.: Generation of inflow turbulence in large-eddy simulations of nonneutral atmospheric boundary layers with the cell perturbation method, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 1889–1909, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0077.1, 2018. a
Muñoz-Esparza, D., Kosović, B., Mirocha, J., and van Beeck, J.: Bridging the transition from mesoscale to microscale turbulence in numerical weather prediction models, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 153, 409–440, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9956-9, 2014. a
Ouyang, T., Kusiak, A., and He, Y.: Predictive model of yaw error in a wind turbine, Energy, 123, 119–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.150, 2017. a
Pao, L. Y. and Johnson, K. E.: A tutorial on the dynamics and control of wind turbines and wind farms, in: 2009 American Control Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 10–12 June 2009, 2076–2089, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2009.5160195, 2009. a
Pedersen, T. F., Gottschall, J., Kristoffersen, J. R., and Dahlberg, J.-Å.: Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm, in: EWEA Annual Event 2011, European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/yawing-and-performance-of-an-offshore-wind-farm (last access: 23 August 2022), 2011. a, b
Peña, A. and Hahmann, A. N.: Atmospheric stability and turbulence fluxes at Horns Rev – An intercomparison of sonic, bulk and WRF model data, Wind Energy, 15, 717–731, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.500, 2012. a
Porté-Agel, F., Wu, Y.-T., and Chen, C.-H.: A numerical study of the effects of wind direction on turbine wakes and power losses in a large wind farm, Energies, 6, 5297–5313, https://doi.org/10.3390/en6105297, 2013. a
Porté-Agel, F., Bastankhah, M., and Shamsoddin, S.: Wind-turbine and wind-farm flows: a review, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 174, 1–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00473-0, 2020. a
Quick, J., Annoni, J., King, R., Dykes, K., Fleming, P., and Ning, A.: Optimization under uncertainty for wake steering strategies, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 854, 012036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012036, 2017. a
Quick, J., King, J., King, R. N., Hamlington, P. E., and Dykes, K.: Wake steering optimization under uncertainty, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 413–426, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-413-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Rasmussen, C. E.: Gaussian processes in machine learning, in: Summer school on machine learning, Springer, 63–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4, 2003. a
Sanz Rodrigo, J., Chávez Arroyo, R. A., Moriarty, P., Churchfield, M., Kosović, B., Réthoré, P.-E., Hansen, K. S., Hahmann, A., Mirocha, J. D., and Rife, D.: Mesoscale to microscale wind farm flow modeling and evaluation, Wires: Energy Environ., 6, e214, https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.214, 2017. a
Schalkwijk, J., Jonker, H. J., Siebesma, A. P., and Bosveld, F. C.: A year-long large-eddy simulation of the weather over Cabauw: An overview, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 828–844, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00293.1, 2015. a
Schepers, J., Boorsma, K., and Munduate, X.: Final Results from Mexnext-I: Analysis of detailed aerodynamic measurements on a 4.5 m diameter rotor placed in the large German Dutch Wind Tunnel DNW, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 555, 012089, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/555/1/012089, 2014. a
Scholbrock, A., Fleming, P., Schlipf, D., Wright, A., Johnson, K., and Wang, N.: Lidar-enhanced wind turbine control: Past, present, and future, in: 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 6–8 July 2016, 1399–1406, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525113, 2016. a
Schreiber, J., Nanos, E., Campagnolo, F., and Bottasso, C. L.: Verification and calibration of a reduced order wind farm model by wind tunnel experiments, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 854, 012041, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012041, 2017. a
Schreiber, J., Bottasso, C. L., Salbert, B., and Campagnolo, F.: Improving wind farm flow models by learning from operational data, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 647–673, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-647-2020, 2020. a
Shapiro, C. R., Starke, G. M., Meneveau, C., and Gayme, D. F.: A wake modeling paradigm for wind farm design and control, Energies, 12, 2956, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152956, 2019. a
Simley, E., Pao, L. Y., Frehlich, R., Jonkman, B., and Kelley, N.: Analysis of light detection and ranging wind speed measurements for wind turbine control, Wind Energy, 17, 413–433, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1584, 2014. a
Simley, E., Fleming, P., and King, J.: Field validation of wake steering control with wind direction variability, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1452, 012012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012012, 2020b. a
Simley, E., Fleming, P., King, J., and Sinner, M.: Wake steering wind farm control with preview wind direction information, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States), https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC50511.2021.9483008, 2021. a
Sinner, M., Pao, L. Y., and King, J.: Estimation of large-scale wind field characteristics using supervisory control and data acquisition measurements, in: 2020 American Control Conference (ACC), Denver, Colorado, USA, 1–3 July 2020, 2357–2362, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147859, 2020. a
Smith, B., Link, H., Randall, G., and McCoy, T.: Applicability of nacelle anemometer measurements for use in turbine power performance tests, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (US), https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/32494.pdf (last access: 18 May 2023), 2002. a
Song, D., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Su, M., Liu, A., and Joo, Y. H.: Wind direction prediction for yaw control of wind turbines, International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 15, 1720–1728, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-017-0289-6, 2017. a, b
Song, D., Yang, J., Fan, X., Liu, Y., Liu, A., Chen, G., and Joo, Y. H.: Maximum power extraction for wind turbines through a novel yaw control solution using predicted wind directions, Energ. Convers. Manage., 157, 587–599, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.019, 2018. a, b
Spencer, M., Stol, K., and Cater, J.: Predictive yaw control of a 5 MW wind turbine model, in: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 9–12 January 2012, p. 1020, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1020, 2013. a, b, c
Starke, G. M., Stanfel, P., Meneveau, C., Gayme, D. F., and King, J.: Network based estimation of wind farm power and velocity data under changing wind direction, in: 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), virtual conference, 25–28 May 2021, 1803–1810, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC50511.2021.9483060, 2021. a, b, c, d
Storey, R., Cater, J., and Norris, S.: Large eddy simulation of turbine loading and performance in a wind farm, Renew. Energ., 95, 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.067, 2016. a, b
Stull, R. B.: An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, vol. 13, Springer Science & Business Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8, 1988. a, b
Su, Z., Wang, J., Lu, H., and Zhao, G.: A new hybrid model optimized by an intelligent optimization algorithm for wind speed forecasting, Energ. Convers. Manage., 85, 443–452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.058, 2014. a
Talbot, C., Bou-Zeid, E., and Smith, J.: Nested mesoscale large-eddy simulations with WRF: Performance in real test cases, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 1421–1441, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-048.1, 2012. a, b
Tsioumas, E., Karakasis, N., Jabbour, N., and Mademlis, C.: Indirect estimation of the Yaw-Angle misalignment in a horizontal axis wind turbine, in: 2017 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED), Tinos, Greece, 29 August–1 September 2017, 45–51, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/DEMPED.2017.8062332, 2017. a
Van Der Hoek, D., Sinner, M., Simley, E., Pao, L., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Estimation of the Ambient Wind Field From Wind Turbine Measurements Using Gaussian Process Regression, in: 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), virtual conference, 25–28 May 2021, 558–563, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC50511.2021.9483088, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Veers, P. S.: Three-dimensional wind simulation, Tech. rep., Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA), https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6633902 (last access: 19 May 2023), 1988. a
Vincent, C., Giebel, G., Pinson, P., and Madsen, H.: Resolving nonstationary spectral information in wind speed time series using the Hilbert–Huang transform, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 49, 253–267, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2058.1, 2010. a
Wu, Y.-T. and Porté-Agel, F.: Large-eddy simulation of wind-turbine wakes: evaluation of turbine parametrisations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 138, 345–366, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9569-x, 2011. a
Xin, W., Yanping, L., and Wei, T.: Modified hill climbing method for active yaw control in wind turbine, in: Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference, Nanchang, China, 3–5 June 2019, 6677–6680, IEEE, Electronic ISBN 978-988-15638-1-1, Print ISBN 978-1-4673-2581-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.019, 2012. a
Yamartino, R. J.: A comparison of several “single-pass” estimators of the standard deviation of wind direction, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 23, 1362–1366, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1362:ACOSPE>2.0.CO;2, 1984. a
Yassin, K., Helms, A., Moreno, D., Kassem, H., Höning, L., and Lukassen, L. J.: Applying a random time mapping to Mann-modeled turbulence for the generation of intermittent wind fields, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1133–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023, 2023. a
Zahle, F. and Sørensen, N. N.: Characterization of the unsteady flow in the nacelle region of a modern wind turbine, Wind Energy, 14, 271–283, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.418, 2011. a, b
Zalkind, D. S. and Pao, L. Y.: The fatigue loading effects of yaw control for wind plants, in: 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), Boston, MA, USA, 6–8 July, 537–542, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7524969, 2016. a, b
Short summary
This review presents the current understanding of wind direction variability in the context of control-oriented modelling of wind turbines and wind farms in a manner suitable to a wide audience. Motivation comes from the significant and commonly seen yaw error of horizontal axis wind turbines, which carries substantial negative impacts on annual energy production and the levellised cost of wind energy. Gaps in the literature are identified, and the critical challenges in this area are discussed.
This review presents the current understanding of wind direction variability in the context of...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint