Articles | Volume 7, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2335-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2335-2022
Research article
 | 
01 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 01 Dec 2022

Optimization of wind farm portfolios for minimizing overall power fluctuations at selective frequencies – a case study of the Faroe Islands

Turið Poulsen, Bárður A. Niclasen, Gregor Giebel, and Hans Georg Beyer

Related authors

Modelling wind farm effects in HARMONIE–AROME (cycle 43.2.2) – Part 1: Implementation and evaluation
Jana Fischereit, Henrik Vedel, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Natalie E. Theeuwes, Gregor Giebel, and Eigil Kaas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2855–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Preface to the special issue of the Division Energy, Resources and the Environment at the EGU General Assembly EGU22
Viktor J. Bruckman, Gregor Giebel, Christopher Juhlin, Sonja Martens, and Michael Kühn
Adv. Geosci., 58, 87–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-58-87-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-58-87-2022, 2022
Wind farm flow control: prospects and challenges
Johan Meyers, Carlo Bottasso, Katherine Dykes, Paul Fleming, Pieter Gebraad, Gregor Giebel, Tuhfe Göçmen, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2271–2306, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022, 2022
Short summary
Preface to the special issue of the Division Energy, Resources and the Environment at vEGU2021: Gather online​​​​​​​
Viktor J. Bruckman, Gregor Giebel, Christopher Juhlin, Sonja Martens, Antonio P. Rinaldi, and Michael Kühn
Adv. Geosci., 56, 13–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-56-13-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-56-13-2021, 2021

Cited articles

Barasa, M. and Aganda, A.: Wind power variability of selected sites in Kenya and the impact to system operating reserve, Renew. Energ., 85, 464–471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.042, 2016. a
Beyer, H. G., Luther, J., and Steinberger-Willms, R.: Fluctuations in the combined power output from geographically distributed grid coupled wind energy conversion systems – an analysis in the frequency domain, Wind Engineering, 14, 179–192, 1990. a, b, c, d
Beyer, H. G., Luther, J., and Steinberger-Willms, R.: Power fluctuations in spatially dispersed wind turbine systems, Sol. Energy, 50, 297–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(93)90025-J, 1993. a, b, c, d
Cassola, F., Burlando, M., Antonelli, M., and Ratto, C. F.: Optimization of the Regional Spatial Distribution of Wind Power Plants to Minimize the Variability of Wind Energy Input into Power Supply Systems, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 3099–3116, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1886.1, 2008. a, b
Enercon: Enercon Product Overview, ENERCON GmbH, Aurich, Germany, April 2012, https://pdf.directindustry.com/pdf/enercon/enercon-product-overview/20877-243513.html (last access: 16 October 2022), 2012. a
Download
Short summary
Wind power is cheap and environmentally friendly, but it has a disadvantage: it is a variable power source. Because wind is not blowing everywhere simultaneously, optimal placement of wind farms can reduce the fluctuations. This is explored for a small isolated area. Combining wind farms reduces wind power fluctuations for timescales up to 1–2 d. By optimally placing four wind farms, the hourly fluctuations are reduced by 15 %. These wind farms are located distant from each other.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint