Articles | Volume 8, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023
Research article
 | 
13 Jul 2023
Research article |  | 13 Jul 2023

Applying a random time mapping to Mann-modeled turbulence for the generation of intermittent wind fields

Khaled Yassin, Arne Helms, Daniela Moreno, Hassan Kassem, Leo Höning, and Laura J. Lukassen

Related authors

Numerical Investigation of Aerodynamic Performance of Wind Turbine Airfoils with Ice Accretion
Khaled Yassin, Hassan Kassem, Bernhard Stoevesandt, Thomas Klemme, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2021-3,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2021-3, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Periods of constant wind speed: how long do they last in the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer?
Daniela Moreno, Jan Friedrich, Matthias Wächter, Jörg Schwarte, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 347–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025, 2025
Short summary
Characterization of local wind profiles: a random forest approach for enhanced wind profile extrapolation
Farkhondeh (Hanie) Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 143–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025, 2025
Short summary
Simulations suggest offshore wind farms modify low-level jets
Daphne Quint, Julie K. Lundquist, and David Rosencrans
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 117–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025, 2025
Short summary
On the lidar-turbulence paradox and possible countermeasures
Alfredo Peña, Ginka G. Yankova, and Vasiliki Mallini
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 83–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025, 2025
Short summary
The actuator farm model for large eddy simulation (LES) of wind-farm-induced atmospheric gravity waves and farm–farm interaction
Sebastiano Stipa, Arjun Ajay, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2301–2332, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2301-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2301-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bangga, G. and Lutz, T.: Aerodynamic modeling of wind turbine loads exposed to turbulent inflow and validation with experimental data, Energy, 223, 120076, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120076, 2021. a
Berg, J., Natarajan, A., Mann, J., and Patton, E. G.: Gaussian vs non-Gaussian turbulence: impact on wind turbine loads, Wind Energy, 19, 1975–1989, 2016. a
Boettcher, F., Renner, C., Waldl, H.-P., and Peinke, J.: On the statistics of wind gusts, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 108, 163–173, 2003. a
Böttcher, F., Barth, S., and Peinke, J.: Small and large scale fluctuations in atmospheric wind speeds, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 21, 299–308, 2007. a, b
Download
Short summary
The current turbulent wind field models stated in the IEC 61400-1 standard underestimate the probability of extreme changes in wind velocity. This underestimation can lead to the false calculation of extreme and fatigue loads on the turbine. In this work, we are trying to apply a random time-mapping technique to one of the standard turbulence models to adapt to such extreme changes. The turbulent fields generated are compared with a standard wind field to show the effects of this new mapping.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint