Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1503-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1503-2022
Research article
 | 
19 Jul 2022
Research article |  | 19 Jul 2022

The wide range of factors contributing to wind resource assessment accuracy in complex terrain

Sarah Barber, Alain Schubiger, Sara Koller, Dominik Eggli, Alexander Radi, Andreas Rumpf, and Hermann Knaus

Related authors

Knowledge engineering for wind energy
Yuriy Marykovskiy, Thomas Clark, Justin Day, Marcus Wiens, Charles Henderson, Julian Quick, Imad Abdallah, Anna Maria Sempreviva, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Eleni Chatzi, and Sarah Barber
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 883–917, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-883-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-883-2024, 2024
Short summary
Grand challenges in the digitalisation of wind energy
Andrew Clifton, Sarah Barber, Andrew Bray, Peter Enevoldsen, Jason Fields, Anna Maria Sempreviva, Lindy Williams, Julian Quick, Mike Purdue, Philip Totaro, and Yu Ding
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 947–974, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-947-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-947-2023, 2023
Short summary
Comparison Metrics Microscale Simulation Challenge for Wind Resource Assessment
Florian Hammer, Sarah Barber, Sebastian Remmler, Federico Bernardoni, Kartik Venkatraman, Gustavo A. Díez Sánchez, Alain Schubiger, Trond-Ola Hågbo, Sophia Buckingham, and Knut Erik Giljarhus
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-114,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-114, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Research challenges and needs for the deployment of wind energy in hilly and mountainous regions
Andrew Clifton, Sarah Barber, Alexander Stökl, Helmut Frank, and Timo Karlsson
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2231–2254, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2231-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2231-2022, 2022
Short summary
Parameter analysis of a multi-element airfoil for application to airborne wind energy
Gianluca De Fezza and Sarah Barber
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1627–1640, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1627-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1627-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Control-oriented modelling of wind direction variability
Scott Dallas, Adam Stock, and Edward Hart
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 841–867, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-841-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-841-2024, 2024
Short summary
Machine learning methods to improve spatial predictions of coastal wind speed profiles and low-level jets using single-level ERA5 data
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Ville Vakkari, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 821–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Offshore low-level jet observations and model representation using lidar buoy data off the California coast
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, William I. Gustafson Jr., Ye Liu, Brian J. Gaudet, Nicola Bodini, Rob K. Newsom, and Mikhail Pekour
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 741–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, 2024
Short summary
Measurement-driven large-eddy simulations of a diurnal cycle during a wake-steering field campaign
Eliot Quon
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 495–518, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-495-2024, 2024
Short summary
The fractal turbulent–non-turbulent interface in the atmosphere
Lars Neuhaus, Matthias Wächter, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 439–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-439-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-439-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alletto, M., Radi, A., Adib, J., Langner, J., Peralta, C., Altmikus, A., and Letzel, M.: E-Wind: Steady state CFD approach for stratified flows used for site assessment at Enercon, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 072020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072020, 2018. a
Bao, J., Chow, F. K., and Lundquist, K. A.: Large-Eddy Simulation over Complex Terrain Using an Improved Immersed Boundary Method in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 2781–2797, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0067.1, 2018. a
Barber, S., Buehler, M., and Nordborg, H.: IEA Wind Task 31: Design of a new comparison metrics simulation challenge for wind resource assessment in complex terrain Stage 1, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062013, 2020a. a
Barber, S., Schubiger, A., Koller, S., Rumpf, A., Knaus, H., and Nordborg, H.: Actual Total Cost reduction of commercial CFD modelling tools for Wind Resource Assessment in complex terrain, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062012, 2020b. a, b, c, d
Barber, S., Schubiger, A., Koller, S., Eggli, D., Rumpf, A., and Knaus, H.: A new process for the pragmatic choice of wind models in complex terrain, final report, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, https://drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/DGxWeKQ35nnbPMW (last access: 18 July 2022), 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Download
Short summary
In this work, a range of simulations are carried out with seven different wind modelling tools at five different complex terrain sites and the results compared to wind speed measurements at validation locations. This is then extended to annual energy production (AEP) estimations (without wake effects), showing that wind profile prediction accuracy does not translate directly or linearly to AEP accuracy. It is therefore vital to consider overall AEP when evaluating simulation accuracies.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint