Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1503-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1503-2022
Research article
 | 
19 Jul 2022
Research article |  | 19 Jul 2022

The wide range of factors contributing to wind resource assessment accuracy in complex terrain

Sarah Barber, Alain Schubiger, Sara Koller, Dominik Eggli, Alexander Radi, Andreas Rumpf, and Hermann Knaus

Related authors

On the Potential of Aerodynamic Pressure Measurements for Structural Damage Detection
Philip Imanuel Franz, Imad Abdallah, Gregory Duthé, Julien Deparday, Ali Jafarabadi, Alexander Popp, Sarah Barber, and Eleni Chatzi
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-26,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-26, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Knowledge engineering for wind energy
Yuriy Marykovskiy, Thomas Clark, Justin Day, Marcus Wiens, Charles Henderson, Julian Quick, Imad Abdallah, Anna Maria Sempreviva, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Eleni Chatzi, and Sarah Barber
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 883–917, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-883-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-883-2024, 2024
Short summary
Grand challenges in the digitalisation of wind energy
Andrew Clifton, Sarah Barber, Andrew Bray, Peter Enevoldsen, Jason Fields, Anna Maria Sempreviva, Lindy Williams, Julian Quick, Mike Purdue, Philip Totaro, and Yu Ding
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 947–974, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-947-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-947-2023, 2023
Short summary
Comparison Metrics Microscale Simulation Challenge for Wind Resource Assessment
Florian Hammer, Sarah Barber, Sebastian Remmler, Federico Bernardoni, Kartik Venkatraman, Gustavo A. Díez Sánchez, Alain Schubiger, Trond-Ola Hågbo, Sophia Buckingham, and Knut Erik Giljarhus
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-114,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-114, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Research challenges and needs for the deployment of wind energy in hilly and mountainous regions
Andrew Clifton, Sarah Barber, Alexander Stökl, Helmut Frank, and Timo Karlsson
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2231–2254, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2231-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2231-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Flow acceleration statistics: a new paradigm for wind-driven loads, towards probabilistic turbine design
Mark Kelly
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 535–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-535-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-535-2025, 2025
Short summary
Observations of wind farm wake recovery at an operating wind farm
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob K. Newsom, Colleen M. Kaul, Stefano Letizia, Mikhail Pekour, Nicholas Hamilton, Duli Chand, Donna Flynn, Nicola Bodini, and Patrick Moriarty
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 361–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-361-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-361-2025, 2025
Short summary
Periods of constant wind speed: how long do they last in the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer?
Daniela Moreno, Jan Friedrich, Matthias Wächter, Jörg Schwarte, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 347–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025, 2025
Short summary
Characterization of local wind profiles: a random forest approach for enhanced wind profile extrapolation
Farkhondeh (Hanie) Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 143–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025, 2025
Short summary
Simulations suggest offshore wind farms modify low-level jets
Daphne Quint, Julie K. Lundquist, and David Rosencrans
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 117–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alletto, M., Radi, A., Adib, J., Langner, J., Peralta, C., Altmikus, A., and Letzel, M.: E-Wind: Steady state CFD approach for stratified flows used for site assessment at Enercon, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 072020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072020, 2018. a
Bao, J., Chow, F. K., and Lundquist, K. A.: Large-Eddy Simulation over Complex Terrain Using an Improved Immersed Boundary Method in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 2781–2797, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0067.1, 2018. a
Barber, S., Buehler, M., and Nordborg, H.: IEA Wind Task 31: Design of a new comparison metrics simulation challenge for wind resource assessment in complex terrain Stage 1, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062013, 2020a. a
Barber, S., Schubiger, A., Koller, S., Rumpf, A., Knaus, H., and Nordborg, H.: Actual Total Cost reduction of commercial CFD modelling tools for Wind Resource Assessment in complex terrain, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062012, 2020b. a, b, c, d
Barber, S., Schubiger, A., Koller, S., Eggli, D., Rumpf, A., and Knaus, H.: A new process for the pragmatic choice of wind models in complex terrain, final report, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, https://drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/DGxWeKQ35nnbPMW (last access: 18 July 2022), 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Download
Short summary
In this work, a range of simulations are carried out with seven different wind modelling tools at five different complex terrain sites and the results compared to wind speed measurements at validation locations. This is then extended to annual energy production (AEP) estimations (without wake effects), showing that wind profile prediction accuracy does not translate directly or linearly to AEP accuracy. It is therefore vital to consider overall AEP when evaluating simulation accuracies.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint