Articles | Volume 9, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1689-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1689-2024
Brief communication
 | 
15 Aug 2024
Brief communication |  | 15 Aug 2024

Brief communication: A simple axial induction modification to the Weather Research and Forecasting Fitch wind farm parameterization

Lukas Vollmer, Balthazar Arnoldus Maria Sengers, and Martin Dörenkämper

Related authors

Improved coupling between an atmospheric LES and an aeroelastic code for the simulation of wind turbines under heterogeneous inflow
Sonja Steinbrück, Thorben Eilers, Lukas Vollmer, Kerstin Avila, and Gerald Steinfeld
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-146,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-146, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
An investigation of spatial wind direction variability and its consideration in engineering models
Anna von Brandis, Gabriele Centurelli, Jonas Schmidt, Lukas Vollmer, Bughsin' Djath, and Martin Dörenkämper
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 589–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-589-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-589-2023, 2023
Short summary
FarmConners wind farm flow control benchmark – Part 1: Blind test results
Tuhfe Göçmen, Filippo Campagnolo, Thomas Duc, Irene Eguinoa, Søren Juhl Andersen, Vlaho Petrović, Lejla Imširović, Robert Braunbehrens, Jaime Liew, Mads Baungaard, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Guowei Qian, Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, Rubén González-Lope, Vinit V. Dighe, Marcus Becker, Maarten J. van den Broek, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, Adam Stock, Matthew Cole, Renzo Ruisi, Ervin Bossanyi, Niklas Requate, Simon Strnad, Jonas Schmidt, Lukas Vollmer, Ishaan Sood, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1791–1825, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022, 2022
Short summary
Overview of the PALM model system 6.0
Björn Maronga, Sabine Banzhaf, Cornelia Burmeister, Thomas Esch, Renate Forkel, Dominik Fröhlich, Vladimir Fuka, Katrin Frieda Gehrke, Jan Geletič, Sebastian Giersch, Tobias Gronemeier, Günter Groß, Wieke Heldens, Antti Hellsten, Fabian Hoffmann, Atsushi Inagaki, Eckhard Kadasch, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Klaus Ketelsen, Basit Ali Khan, Christoph Knigge, Helge Knoop, Pavel Krč, Mona Kurppa, Halim Maamari, Andreas Matzarakis, Matthias Mauder, Matthias Pallasch, Dirk Pavlik, Jens Pfafferott, Jaroslav Resler, Sascha Rissmann, Emmanuele Russo, Mohamed Salim, Michael Schrempf, Johannes Schwenkel, Gunther Seckmeyer, Sebastian Schubert, Matthias Sühring, Robert von Tils, Lukas Vollmer, Simon Ward, Björn Witha, Hauke Wurps, Julian Zeidler, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1335–1372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020, 2020
Short summary
Transient LES of an offshore wind turbine
Lukas Vollmer, Gerald Steinfeld, and Martin Kühn
Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 603–614, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-603-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-603-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Understanding the impact of data gaps on long-term offshore wind resource estimates
Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2217–2233, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2217-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2217-2024, 2024
Short summary
Converging profile relationships for offshore wind speed and turbulence intensity
Gus Jeans
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2001–2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2001-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2001-2024, 2024
Short summary
A simple steady-state inflow model of the neutral and stable atmospheric boundary layer applied to wind turbine wake simulations
Maarten Paul van der Laan, Mark Kelly, Mads Baungaard, Antariksh Dicholkar, and Emily Louise Hodgson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1985–2000, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1985-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1985-2024, 2024
Short summary
Influences of lidar scanning parameters on wind turbine wake retrievals in complex terrain
Rachel Robey and Julie K. Lundquist
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1905–1922, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1905-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1905-2024, 2024
Short summary
Experimental evaluation of wind turbine wake turbulence impacts on a general aviation aircraft
Jonathan D. Rogers
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1849–1868, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1849-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1849-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abkar, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new wind-farm parameterization for large-scale atmospheric models, J. Renew. Sustain. Energ., 7, 013121, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907600, 2015. a
Archer, C., Wu, S., Ma, Y., and Jimenez, P.: Two Corrections for Turbulent Kinetic Energy Generated by Wind Farms in the WRF Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 4823–4835, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0097.1, 2020. a
Cañadillas, B., Beckenbauer, M., Trujillo, J. J., Dörenkämper, M., Foreman, R., Neumann, T., and Lampert, A.: Offshore wind farm cluster wakes as observed by long-range-scanning wind lidar measurements and mesoscale modeling, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1241–1262, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1241-2022, 2022. a, b
Fischereit, J., Brown, R., Larsén, X. G., Badger, J., and Hawkes, G.: Review of Mesoscale Wind-Farm Parametrizations and Their Applications, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 182, 175–224, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00652-y, 2021. a, b, c
Fitch, A. C., Olson, J. B., Lundquist, J. K., Dudhia, J., Gupta, A. K., Michalakes, J., and Barstad, I.: Local and Mesoscale Impacts of Wind Farms as Parameterized in a Mesoscale NWP Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3017–3038, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00352.1, 2012. a
Download
Short summary
This study proposes a modification to a well-established wind farm parameterization used in mesoscale models. The wind speed at the location of the turbine, which is used to calculate power and thrust, is corrected to approximate the free wind speed. Results show that the modified parameterization produces more accurate estimates of the turbine’s power curve.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint