Articles | Volume 5, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1225-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1225-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An alternative form of the super-Gaussian wind turbine wake model
Frédéric Blondel
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
IFP Énergies nouvelles, 1&4 Avenue du Bois Préau, 92862 Rueil-Malmaison, France
Marie Cathelain
IFP Énergies nouvelles, 1&4 Avenue du Bois Préau, 92862 Rueil-Malmaison, France
Authors' note: since the publication of this model, a revised set of parameters reported to offer improved accuracy has been proposed in Blondel (2023). We strongly advise using that updated parameter set.
Related authors
Erwan Jézéquel, Frédéric Blondel, and Valéry Masson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 97–117, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-97-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-97-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine wakes affect the production and lifecycle of downstream turbines. They can be predicted with the dynamic wake meandering (DWM) method. In this paper, the authors break down the velocity and turbulence in the wake of a wind turbine into several terms. They show that it is implicitly assumed in the DWM that some of these terms are neglected. With high-fidelity simulations, it is shown that this can lead to some errors, in particular for the maximum turbulence added by the wake.
Erwan Jézéquel, Frédéric Blondel, and Valéry Masson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 119–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-119-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Analytical models allow us to quickly compute the decreased power output and lifetime induced by wakes in a wind farm. This is achieved by evaluating the modified velocity and turbulence in the wake. In this work, we present a new model based on the velocity and turbulence breakdowns presented in Part 1. This new model is physically based, allows us to compute the whole turbulence profile (rather than the maximum value) and is built to take atmospheric stability into account.
Roger Bergua, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Emmanuel Branlard, Alessandro Fontanella, Marco Belloli, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Giacomo Persico, Andrea Sanvito, Ervin Amet, Cédric Brun, Guillén Campaña-Alonso, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Ruolin Cai, Jifeng Cai, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Georg Pirrung, Néstor Ramos-García, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Tor Anders Nygaard, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Philippe Gilbert, Pierre-Antoine Joulin, Frédéric Blondel, Eelco Frickel, Peng Chen, Zhiqiang Hu, Ronan Boisard, Kutay Yilmazlar, Alessandro Croce, Violette Harnois, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Ander Aristondo, Iñigo Mendikoa Alonso, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Feike Savenije, David Marten, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Alessandro Bianchini, Francesco Papi, Stefano Cioni, Pau Trubat, Daniel Alarcon, Climent Molins, Marion Cormier, Konstantin Brüker, Thorsten Lutz, Qing Xiao, Zhongsheng Deng, Florence Haudin, and Akhilesh Goveas
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 465–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines if the motion experienced by an offshore floating wind turbine can significantly affect the rotor performance. It was observed that the system motion results in variations in the load, but these variations are not critical, and the current simulation tools capture the physics properly. Interestingly, variations in the rotor speed or the blade pitch angle can have a larger impact than the system motion itself.
Koen Boorsma, Gerard Schepers, Helge Aagard Madsen, Georg Pirrung, Niels Sørensen, Galih Bangga, Manfred Imiela, Christian Grinderslev, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Wen Zhong Shen, Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, Brandon Lobo, Frederic Blondel, Philippe Gilbert, Ronan Boisard, Leo Höning, Luca Greco, Claudio Testa, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Ganesh Vijayakumar
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within the framework of the fourth phase of the International Energy Agency's (IEA) Wind Task 29, a large comparison exercise between measurements and aeroelastic simulations has been carried out. Results were obtained from more than 19 simulation tools of various fidelity, originating from 12 institutes and compared to state-of-the-art field measurements. The result is a unique insight into the current status and accuracy of rotor aerodynamic modeling.
Frédéric Blondel
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 141–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-141-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-141-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate wind farm flow predictions based on analytical wake models are crucial for wind farm design and layout optimization. Wake superposition methods play a key role and remain a substantial source of uncertainty. In the present work, a momentum-conserving superposition method is extended to the superposition of super-Gaussian-type velocity deficit models, allowing the full wake velocity deficit estimation and design of closely packed wind farms.
Tuhfe Göçmen, Filippo Campagnolo, Thomas Duc, Irene Eguinoa, Søren Juhl Andersen, Vlaho Petrović, Lejla Imširović, Robert Braunbehrens, Jaime Liew, Mads Baungaard, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Guowei Qian, Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, Rubén González-Lope, Vinit V. Dighe, Marcus Becker, Maarten J. van den Broek, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, Adam Stock, Matthew Cole, Renzo Ruisi, Ervin Bossanyi, Niklas Requate, Simon Strnad, Jonas Schmidt, Lukas Vollmer, Ishaan Sood, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1791–1825, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The FarmConners benchmark is the first of its kind to bring a wide variety of data sets, control settings, and model complexities for the (initial) assessment of wind farm flow control benefits. Here we present the first part of the benchmark results for three blind tests with large-scale rotors and 11 participating models in total, via direct power comparisons at the turbines as well as the observed or estimated power gain at the wind farm level under wake steering control strategy.
Erwan Jézéquel, Frédéric Blondel, and Valéry Masson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 97–117, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-97-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-97-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine wakes affect the production and lifecycle of downstream turbines. They can be predicted with the dynamic wake meandering (DWM) method. In this paper, the authors break down the velocity and turbulence in the wake of a wind turbine into several terms. They show that it is implicitly assumed in the DWM that some of these terms are neglected. With high-fidelity simulations, it is shown that this can lead to some errors, in particular for the maximum turbulence added by the wake.
Erwan Jézéquel, Frédéric Blondel, and Valéry Masson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 119–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-119-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Analytical models allow us to quickly compute the decreased power output and lifetime induced by wakes in a wind farm. This is achieved by evaluating the modified velocity and turbulence in the wake. In this work, we present a new model based on the velocity and turbulence breakdowns presented in Part 1. This new model is physically based, allows us to compute the whole turbulence profile (rather than the maximum value) and is built to take atmospheric stability into account.
Roger Bergua, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Emmanuel Branlard, Alessandro Fontanella, Marco Belloli, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Giacomo Persico, Andrea Sanvito, Ervin Amet, Cédric Brun, Guillén Campaña-Alonso, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Ruolin Cai, Jifeng Cai, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Georg Pirrung, Néstor Ramos-García, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Tor Anders Nygaard, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Philippe Gilbert, Pierre-Antoine Joulin, Frédéric Blondel, Eelco Frickel, Peng Chen, Zhiqiang Hu, Ronan Boisard, Kutay Yilmazlar, Alessandro Croce, Violette Harnois, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Ander Aristondo, Iñigo Mendikoa Alonso, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Feike Savenije, David Marten, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Alessandro Bianchini, Francesco Papi, Stefano Cioni, Pau Trubat, Daniel Alarcon, Climent Molins, Marion Cormier, Konstantin Brüker, Thorsten Lutz, Qing Xiao, Zhongsheng Deng, Florence Haudin, and Akhilesh Goveas
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 465–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines if the motion experienced by an offshore floating wind turbine can significantly affect the rotor performance. It was observed that the system motion results in variations in the load, but these variations are not critical, and the current simulation tools capture the physics properly. Interestingly, variations in the rotor speed or the blade pitch angle can have a larger impact than the system motion itself.
Koen Boorsma, Gerard Schepers, Helge Aagard Madsen, Georg Pirrung, Niels Sørensen, Galih Bangga, Manfred Imiela, Christian Grinderslev, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Wen Zhong Shen, Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, Brandon Lobo, Frederic Blondel, Philippe Gilbert, Ronan Boisard, Leo Höning, Luca Greco, Claudio Testa, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Ganesh Vijayakumar
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within the framework of the fourth phase of the International Energy Agency's (IEA) Wind Task 29, a large comparison exercise between measurements and aeroelastic simulations has been carried out. Results were obtained from more than 19 simulation tools of various fidelity, originating from 12 institutes and compared to state-of-the-art field measurements. The result is a unique insight into the current status and accuracy of rotor aerodynamic modeling.
Frédéric Blondel
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 141–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-141-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-141-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate wind farm flow predictions based on analytical wake models are crucial for wind farm design and layout optimization. Wake superposition methods play a key role and remain a substantial source of uncertainty. In the present work, a momentum-conserving superposition method is extended to the superposition of super-Gaussian-type velocity deficit models, allowing the full wake velocity deficit estimation and design of closely packed wind farms.
Tuhfe Göçmen, Filippo Campagnolo, Thomas Duc, Irene Eguinoa, Søren Juhl Andersen, Vlaho Petrović, Lejla Imširović, Robert Braunbehrens, Jaime Liew, Mads Baungaard, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Guowei Qian, Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, Rubén González-Lope, Vinit V. Dighe, Marcus Becker, Maarten J. van den Broek, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, Adam Stock, Matthew Cole, Renzo Ruisi, Ervin Bossanyi, Niklas Requate, Simon Strnad, Jonas Schmidt, Lukas Vollmer, Ishaan Sood, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1791–1825, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The FarmConners benchmark is the first of its kind to bring a wide variety of data sets, control settings, and model complexities for the (initial) assessment of wind farm flow control benefits. Here we present the first part of the benchmark results for three blind tests with large-scale rotors and 11 participating models in total, via direct power comparisons at the turbines as well as the observed or estimated power gain at the wind farm level under wake steering control strategy.
Cited articles
Aubrun, S., Loyer, S., Hancock, P., and Hayden, P.: Wind turbine wake
properties: Comparison between a non-rotating simplified wind turbine model
and a rotating model, J. Wind Eng. Ind.
Aerod., 120, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.06.007,
2013. a, b, c, d
Bartl, J. and Sætran, L.: Blind test comparison of the performance and wake flow between two in-line wind turbines exposed to different turbulent inflow conditions, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 55–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-55-2017, 2017. a
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Experimental and theoretical study of wind
turbine wakes in yawed conditions, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3607598, 2020. a
Boorsma, K., Schepers, J., Gomez-Iradi, S., Herraez, I., Lutz, T., Weihing, P.,
Oggiano, L., Pirrung, G., Madsen, H., Shen, W., Rahimi, H., and Schaffarczyk,
P.: Final Report of IEA Wind Task 29 Mexnext (Phase 3), Tech. Rep.
ECN-E–18-003, ECN Wind Energy,
available at: https://publications.ecn.nl/WIN/0/ECN-E--18-003, last access: 18 November 2019. a
Burton, T., Jenkins, J., Sharpe, D., and Bossanyl, E.: Aerodynamics of
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines, chap. 3, 39–136, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119992714.ch3,
2011. a
Churchfield, M., Lee, S., Moriarty, P., Martinez, L., Leonardi, S.,
Vijayakumar, G., and Brasseur, J.: A Large-Eddy Simulation of wind-plant
aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-537, 2012. a, b, c
Doubrawa, P., Debnath, M., Moriarty, P. J., Branlard, E., Herges, T. G.,
Maniaci, D. C., and Naughton, B.: Benchmarks for model validation based on
LiDAR wake measurements, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1256,
012024, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1256/1/012024,
2019. a, b
Frandsen, S., Barthelmie, R., Pryor, S., Rathmann, O., Larsen, S., Højstrup,
J., and Thøgersen, M.: Analytical modelling of wind speed deficit in large
offshore wind farms, Wind Energy, 9, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.189, 2006. a, b, c, d
Herges, T. G., Maniaci, D. C., Naughton, B. T., Mikkelsen, T., and Sjöholm,
M.: High resolution wind turbine wake measurements with a scanning lidar,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 854, 012021,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012021, 2017. a
Jensen, N.: A note on wind generator interaction, RISOE-M-2411, Risø
National Laboratory,
available at: https://books.google.fr/books?id=5w3tvgEACAAJ (last access: 1 November 2019), 1983. a
Joulin, P., Mayol, M., Blondel, F., Masson, V., Rodier, Q., and Lac, C.:
Coupling the actuator line method to the high order meteorological LES
model Meso-NH to study wind farm wakes impacts on local meteorology,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1256, 012019,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1256/1/012019,
2019. a
Katic, I., Højstrup, J., and Jensen, N.: A simple model for cluster
efficiency, in: EWEC'86. Proceedings, Vol. 1, edited by: Palz, W. and Sesto,
E., 407–410, A. Raguzzi,
available at: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/a-simple-model-for-cluster-efficiency (last access: 1 November 2019),
1987. a
Keane, A., Aguirre, P. E. O., Ferchland, H., Clive, P., and Gallacher, D.: An
analytical model for a full wind turbine wake, J. Phys. Conf.
Ser., 753, 032039, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/3/032039, 2016. a
Lissaman, P.: Energy effectiveness of arbitrary arrays of wind turbines,
J. Energy, 3, 323–328, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.62441, 1979. a
Mudafort, R. M., paulf81,
bayc,
ejsimley,
nhamilto,
Bachant, P.,
Fleming, K.,
jrannoni,
Hammond, R.,
Bensason, D.,
ewquon,
Seim, K. S.,
Sortland, S.,
Martinez, T., and
afarrell2:
NREL/floris v2.1.1, Zenodo, v2.1.1,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3906713, 2020. a
Niayifar, A. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind farm
power prediction, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 625, 012039,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012039,
2015. a, b
Qian, G.-W. and Ishihara, T.: A new analytical wake model for yawed wind
turbines, Energies, 11, 665, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030665, 2018. a, b, c
Sanderse, B.: Aerodynamics of wind turbine wakes – literature review, Tech.
rep., ECN,
available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.616.9524 (last access: 1 November 2019),
2009. a
Schreiber, J., Balbaa, A., and Bottasso, C. L.: Brief communication: A double-Gaussian wake model, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 237–244, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-237-2020, 2020. a
Shapiro, C. R., Starke, G. M., Meneveau, C., and Gayme, D. F.: A wake modeling
paradigm for wind farm design and control, Energies, 12, 2956,
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152956, 2019. a, b
Sørensen, J. N., Mikkelsen, R. F., Henningson, D. S., Ivanell, S., Sarmast,
S., and Andersen, S. J.: Simulation of wind turbine wakes using the actuator
line technique, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 373, 20140071,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0071,
2015.
a
Sumner, J., Espana, G., Masson, C., and Aubrun, S.: Evaluation of RANS/actuator
disk modelling of wind turbine wake flow using wind tunnel measurements,
International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 5,
147–158, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESMS.2013.052382, 2013. a, b
Download
Please read the editorial note first before accessing the article.
- Article
(2131 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
Analytical wind turbine wake models are of high interest for wind farm designers: they provide an estimation of wake losses for a given layout at a low computational cost. Consequently they are heavily used for wind farm design and power production evaluation. While most analytical models focus on far-wake characteristics, we propose an approach that is able to represent both near- and far-wake velocity deficit, enabling the simulation of closely packed wind farms.
Analytical wind turbine wake models are of high interest for wind farm designers: they provide...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint