Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 35–54, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-35-2017
Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 35–54, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-35-2017
Research article
09 Feb 2017
Research article | 09 Feb 2017

A methodology for the design and testing of atmospheric boundary layer models for wind energy applications

Javier Sanz Rodrigo et al.

Related authors

On the measurement of stability parameter over complex mountainous terrain
Elena Cantero, Javier Sanz, Fernando Borbón, Daniel Paredes, and Almudena García
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 221–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-221-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-221-2022, 2022
Short summary
The Alaiz experiment: untangling multi-scale stratified flows over complex terrain
Pedro Santos, Jakob Mann, Nikola Vasiljević, Elena Cantero, Javier Sanz Rodrigo, Fernando Borbón, Daniel Martínez-Villagrasa, Belén Martí, and Joan Cuxart
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1793–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1793-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1793-2020, 2020
Short summary
The Making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 2: Production and evaluation
Martin Dörenkämper, Bjarke T. Olsen, Björn Witha, Andrea N. Hahmann, Neil N. Davis, Jordi Barcons, Yasemin Ezber, Elena García-Bustamante, J. Fidel González-Rouco, Jorge Navarro, Mariano Sastre-Marugán, Tija Sīle, Wilke Trei, Mark Žagar, Jake Badger, Julia Gottschall, Javier Sanz Rodrigo, and Jakob Mann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5079–5102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5079-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5079-2020, 2020
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation sensitivities to variations of configuration and forcing parameters in canonical boundary-layer flows for wind energy applications
Jeffrey D. Mirocha, Matthew J. Churchfield, Domingo Muñoz-Esparza, Raj K. Rai, Yan Feng, Branko Kosović, Sue Ellen Haupt, Barbara Brown, Brandon L. Ennis, Caroline Draxl, Javier Sanz Rodrigo, William J. Shaw, Larry K. Berg, Patrick J. Moriarty, Rodman R. Linn, Veerabhadra R. Kotamarthi, Ramesh Balakrishnan, Joel W. Cline, Michael C. Robinson, and Shreyas Ananthan
Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 589–613, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-589-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-589-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Wind and turbulence
Evaluation of obstacle modelling approaches for resource assessment and small wind turbine siting: case study in the northern Netherlands
Caleb Phillips, Lindsay M. Sheridan, Patrick Conry, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Dmitry Duplyakin, Sagi Zisman, Nicolas Duboc, Matt Nelson, Rao Kotamarthi, Rod Linn, Marc Broersma, Timo Spijkerboer, and Heidi Tinnesand
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing and validating intra-farm and farm-to-farm wakes across different mesoscale and high-resolution wake models
Jana Fischereit, Kurt Schaldemose Hansen, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, and Juan Pablo Murcia Leon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1069–1091, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022, 2022
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation of airborne wind energy farms
Thomas Haas, Jochem De Schutter, Moritz Diehl, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1093–1135, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1093-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Investigation into boundary layer transition using wall-resolved large-eddy simulations and modeled inflow turbulence
Brandon Arthur Lobo, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, and Michael Breuer
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 967–990, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-967-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-967-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of the global-blockage effect on power performance through simulations and measurements
Alessandro Sebastiani, Alfredo Peña, Niels Troldborg, and Alexander Meyer Forsting
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 875–886, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-875-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-875-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Apsley, D. D. and Castro, I. P.: A limited-length-scale k-ε model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 83, 75–98, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000252210512, 1997.
Baas, P., Bosveld, F. C., Baltink, K., and Holtslag, A. A. M.: A Climatology of Nocturnal Low-Level Jets at Cabauw, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 1627–1642, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC1965.1, 2009.
Baas, P., Bosveld, F. C., Lenderink, G., van Meijgaard, E., and Holtslag, A. A. M.: How to design single-column model experiments for comparison with observed nocturnal low-level jets, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 671–684, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.592, 2010.
Baas, P., van de Wiel, B. J. H., van den Brink, L., and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Composite hodographs and inertial oscillations in the nocturnal boundary layer, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 528–535, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.941, 2011.
Basu, S., Holtslag, A., Wiel, B., Moene, A., and Steeneveld, G.-J.: An inconvenient “truth” about using sensible heat flux as a surface boundary condition in models under stably stratified regimes, Acta Geophys., 56, 88–99, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-007-0038-y, 2008.
Download
Short summary
The series of GABLS model intercomparison benchmarks is revisited in the context of wind energy atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) models. GABLS 1 and 2 are used for verification purposes. Then GABLS 3 is used to develop a methodology for using realistic mesoscale forcing for microscale ABL models. The method also uses profile nudging to dynamically reduce the bias. Different data assimilation strategies are discussed based on typical instrumentation setups of wind energy campaigns.