Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-345-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-345-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
09 Feb 2022
Research article |
| 09 Feb 2022
| 09 Feb 2022
Optimal closed-loop wake steering – Part 2: Diurnal cycle atmospheric boundary layer conditions
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Aditya S. Ghate
Department of Astronautics and Aeronautics, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA 94305, USA
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA 94035, USA
Jesús Bas Quesada
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Innovation & Technology, Sarriguren, Navarra, 31621, Spain
Juan José Pena Martínez
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Innovation & Technology, Sarriguren, Navarra, 31621, Spain
Wei Zhong
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Innovation & Technology, Sarriguren, Navarra, 31621, Spain
Felipe Palou Larrañaga
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Innovation & Technology, Sarriguren, Navarra, 31621, Spain
Sanjiva K. Lele
Department of Astronautics and Aeronautics, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA 94305, USA
John O. Dabiri
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories (GALCIT), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Related authors
Sara Porchetta, Wim Munters, Maxime Lejeune, Ruben Borgers, Sophia Buckingham, and Michael F. Howland
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 3273–3294, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3273-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3273-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how a newly built offshore wind farm affects the power production of nearby existing wind farms. Using a full year of simulations, we compare detailed weather-based models with faster simplified models. The results show clear differences in predicted power losses, especially during calm summer conditions, highlighting the importance of model choice for future offshore wind farm planning and design.
Sara Porchetta, Michael F. Howland, Maxime Lejeune, Ruben Borgers, Sophia Buckingham, and Wim Munters
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 3295–3319, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3295-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3295-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how a newly built offshore wind farm affects the power production of nearby existing wind farms. Using a full year of simulations, we compare detailed weather-based models with faster simplified models. The results show clear differences in predicted power losses, especially during calm summer conditions, highlighting the importance of model choice for future offshore wind farm planning and design.
Kirby S. Heck and Michael F. Howland
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-149, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-149, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine wakes are regions of slower, turbulent flow that reduce power generated downstream. Engineering models often simplify how atmospheric conditions shape these wakes, limiting accuracy, especially as turbines grow larger. We develop a model that captures these effects by jointly predicting changes in wind speed and turbulence. Across the wind farms and atmospheric conditions tested, the new model improves predictions of wind farm performance, supporting future design and operation.
Baris Kale, Mohammadreza Asadbeigi, Aditya K. Aiyer, and Michael F. Howland
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2292, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2292, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We implemented two existing methods that account for how ocean waves influence the wind within a high-resolution atmospheric simulation model. By comparing them with a more detailed but computationally expensive approach, we show that they capture key effects but miss some smaller-scale motions. This work provides a practical framework for studying air-sea interactions relevant to weather and offshore wind energy.
Kirby S. Heck, Jaime Liew, Ilan M. L. Upfal, and Michael F. Howland
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-90, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-90, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines within a wind farm can be controlled collectively, rather than individually, to mitigate wake interactions between turbines and enhance power production. Here, we join two common wind farm control strategies synergistically, enabled by advances in aerodynamic rotor modeling. The joint strategy outperforms other control strategies when compared with advanced computer simulations, and future improvements on wake modeling can further extend these power gains for large wind farms.
Sara Porchetta, Wim Munters, Maxime Lejeune, Ruben Borgers, Sophia Buckingham, and Michael F. Howland
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 3273–3294, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3273-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3273-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how a newly built offshore wind farm affects the power production of nearby existing wind farms. Using a full year of simulations, we compare detailed weather-based models with faster simplified models. The results show clear differences in predicted power losses, especially during calm summer conditions, highlighting the importance of model choice for future offshore wind farm planning and design.
Sara Porchetta, Michael F. Howland, Maxime Lejeune, Ruben Borgers, Sophia Buckingham, and Wim Munters
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 3295–3319, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3295-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3295-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how a newly built offshore wind farm affects the power production of nearby existing wind farms. Using a full year of simulations, we compare detailed weather-based models with faster simplified models. The results show clear differences in predicted power losses, especially during calm summer conditions, highlighting the importance of model choice for future offshore wind farm planning and design.
Kirby S. Heck and Michael F. Howland
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-149, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-149, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine wakes are regions of slower, turbulent flow that reduce power generated downstream. Engineering models often simplify how atmospheric conditions shape these wakes, limiting accuracy, especially as turbines grow larger. We develop a model that captures these effects by jointly predicting changes in wind speed and turbulence. Across the wind farms and atmospheric conditions tested, the new model improves predictions of wind farm performance, supporting future design and operation.
Baris Kale, Mohammadreza Asadbeigi, Aditya K. Aiyer, and Michael F. Howland
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2292, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2292, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We implemented two existing methods that account for how ocean waves influence the wind within a high-resolution atmospheric simulation model. By comparing them with a more detailed but computationally expensive approach, we show that they capture key effects but miss some smaller-scale motions. This work provides a practical framework for studying air-sea interactions relevant to weather and offshore wind energy.
Kirby S. Heck, Jaime Liew, Ilan M. L. Upfal, and Michael F. Howland
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-90, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-90, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines within a wind farm can be controlled collectively, rather than individually, to mitigate wake interactions between turbines and enhance power production. Here, we join two common wind farm control strategies synergistically, enabled by advances in aerodynamic rotor modeling. The joint strategy outperforms other control strategies when compared with advanced computer simulations, and future improvements on wake modeling can further extend these power gains for large wind farms.
Cited articles
Abkar, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Influence of atmospheric stability on
wind-turbine wakes: A large-eddy simulation study, Phys. Fluids, 27,
035104, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4913695, 2015. a, b, c
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Large eddy simulation of a large wind-turbine
array in a conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer, Phys.
Fluids, 27, 065108, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922339, 2015. a
Annoni, J., Bay, C., Johnson, K., Dall'Anese, E., Quon, E., Kemper, T., and Fleming, P.: Wind direction estimation using SCADA data with consensus-based optimization, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 355–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-355-2019, 2019. a
Atkinson, B. and Wu Zhang, J.: Mesoscale shallow convection in the atmosphere,
Rev. Geophys., 34, 403–431, 1996. a
Barthelmie, R. J. and Jensen, L.: Evaluation of wind farm efficiency and wind
turbine wakes at the Nysted offshore wind farm, Wind Energy, 13, 573–586,
2010. a
Basu, S., Holtslag, A. A., Van De Wiel, B. J., Moene, A. F., and Steeneveld,
G.-J.: An inconvenient “truth” about using sensible heat flux as a
surface boundary condition in models under stably stratified regimes, Acta
Geophys., 56, 88–99, 2008a. a
Basu, S., Vinuesa, J.-F., and Swift, A.: Dynamic LES modeling of a diurnal
cycle, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 1156–1174,
2008b. a
Beare, R. J., Macvean, M. K., Holtslag, A. A., Cuxart, J., Esau, I., Golaz, J. C., Jimenez, M. A., Khairoutdinov, M., Kosovic, B., Lewellen, D., and Lund, T. S.:
An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 118, 247–272, 2006. a
Bosveld, F. C., Baas, P., van Meijgaard, E., de Bruijn, E. I., Steeneveld,
G.-J., and Holtslag, A. A.: The third GABLS intercomparison case for
evaluation studies of boundary-layer models. Part A: Case selection and
set-up, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 152, 133–156, 2014. a
Campagnolo, F. and Bottasso, C. L.: On the effectiveness of one-sided wake
steering-A wind tunnel study with dynamic direction changes, in: 2021
American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 25–28 May 2021, New Orleans, LA, USA, 20942388, 3070–3075, https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC50511.2021.9483266, 2021. a
Campagnolo, F., Weber, R., Schreiber, J., and Bottasso, C. L.: Wind tunnel testing of wake steering with dynamic wind direction changes, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1273–1295, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1273-2020, 2020. a, b
Ciri, U., Rotea, M. A., and Leonardi, S.: Model-free control of wind farms: A
comparative study between individual and coordinated extremum seeking,
Renew. Energ., 113, 1033–1045, 2017. a
Deardorff, J. W.: Numerical investigation of neutral and unstable planetary
boundary layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 91–115, 1972. a
Doekemeijer, B. M., Kern, S., Maturu, S., Kanev, S., Salbert, B., Schreiber, J., Campagnolo, F., Bottasso, C. L., Schuler, S., Wilts, F., Neumann, T., Potenza, G., Calabretta, F., Fioretti, F., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Field experiment for open-loop yaw-based wake steering at a commercial onshore wind farm in Italy, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 159–176, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-159-2021, 2021. a, b
Evensen, G.: The ensemble Kalman filter: Theoretical formulation and practical
implementation, Ocean Dynam., 53, 343–367, 2003. a
Fleming, P., Scholbrock, A., Jehu, A., Davoust, S., Osler, E., Wright, A. D.,
and Clifton, A.: Field-test results using a nacelle-mounted lidar for
improving wind turbine power capture by reducing yaw misalignment,
J. Phys.-Conf. Ser., 524, 012002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012002, 2014. a, b
Fleming, P., King, J., Dykes, K., Simley, E., Roadman, J., Scholbrock, A., Murphy, P., Lundquist, J. K., Moriarty, P., Fleming, K., van Dam, J., Bay, C., Mudafort, R., Lopez, H., Skopek, J., Scott, M., Ryan, B., Guernsey, C., and Brake, D.: Initial results from a field campaign of wake steering applied at a commercial wind farm – Part 1, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 273–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-273-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d, e
Gadde, S. N. and Stevens, R. J.: Effect of low-level jet height on wind farm
performance, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 13, 013305, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0026232, 2021. a
Ghate, A. S. and Lele, S. K.: Subfilter-scale enrichment of planetary boundary
layer large eddy simulation using discrete Fourier–Gabor modes, J.
Fluid Mech., 819, 494–539, 2017. a
Horst, T., Kleissl, J., Lenschow, D., Meneveau, C., Moeng, C., Parlange, M.,
Sullivan, P., and Weil, J.: HATS: Field observations to obtain filtered
fields from crosswind arrays of sonic anemometers in the atmospheric surface
layer, J. Atmos. Sci, 61, 1566–1581, 2004. a
Howland, M. F.: Supporting data for Optimal closed-loop wake steering, Part 2:
Diurnal cycle atmospheric boundary layer conditions, Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5160943, 2021a. a
Howland, M. F. and Dabiri, J. O.: Influence of Wake Model Superposition and
Secondary Steering on Model-Based Wake Steering Control with SCADA Data
Assimilation, Energies, 14, 52, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010052, 2021. a, b, c, d
Howland, M. F., Ghate, A. S., and Lele, S. K.: Coriolis effects within and
trailing a large finite wind farm, in: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 6–10 January 2020, Orlando, FL , p. 0994, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0994,
2020a. a
Howland, M. F., Ghate, A. S., and Lele, S. K.: Influence of the geostrophic
wind direction on the atmospheric boundary layer flow, J. Fluid
Mech., 883, A39,
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.889, 2020b. a, b, c
Howland, M. F., Ghate, A. S., Lele, S. K., and Dabiri, J. O.: Optimal closed-loop wake steering – Part 1: Conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer conditions, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1315–1338, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1315-2020, 2020c. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s
Howland, M. F., González, C. M., Martínez, J. J. P., Quesada, J. B.,
Larranaga, F. P., Yadav, N. K., Chawla, J. S., and Dabiri, J. O.: Influence
of atmospheric conditions on the power production of utility-scale wind
turbines in yaw misalignment, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener.,
12, 063307, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023746, 2020d. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Hure, N., Turnar, R., Vašak, M., and Benčić, G.: Optimal wind
turbine yaw control supported with very short-term wind predictions, in: 2015
IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), IEEE, Seville, Spain, 17–19 March 2015, 15219611, 385–391, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2015.7125129,
2015. a
Iungo, G. V. and Porté-Agel, F.: Volumetric lidar scanning of wind turbine
wakes under convective and neutral atmospheric stability regimes, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 2035–2048, 2014. a
Jensen, N. O.: A note on wind generator interaction, Vol. 2411, Roskilde, Denmark, Risø National Laboratory, 1983. a
Kanev, S.: Dynamic wake steering and its impact on wind farm power production
and yaw actuator duty, Renew. Energ., 146, 9–15, 2020. a
Lele, S. K.: Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution,
J. Comput. Phys., 103, 16–42, 1992. a
Liew, J., Urbán, A. M., and Andersen, S. J.: Analytical model for the power–yaw sensitivity of wind turbines operating in full wake, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 427–437, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-427-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Lissaman, P.: Energy effectiveness of arbitrary arrays of wind turbines,
J. Energy, 3, 323–328, 1979. a
Macrí, S., Aubrun, S., Leroy, A., and Girard, N.: Experimental investigation of wind turbine wake and load dynamics during yaw maneuvers, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 585–599, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-585-2021, 2021. a
Martínez-Tossas, L. A., King, J., Quon, E., Bay, C. J., Mudafort, R., Hamilton, N., Howland, M. F., and Fleming, P. A.: The curled wake model: a three-dimensional and extremely fast steady-state wake solver for wind plant flows, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 555–570, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-555-2021, 2021. a
Muñoz-Esparza, D., Lundquist, J. K., Sauer, J. A., Kosović, B., and
Linn, R. R.: Coupled mesoscale-LES modeling of a diurnal cycle during the
CWEX-13 field campaign: From weather to boundary-layer eddies, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 1572–1594, 2017. a
Munters, W., Meneveau, C., and Meyers, J.: Turbulent inflow precursor method
with time-varying direction for large-eddy simulations and applications to
wind farms, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 159, 305–328, 2016. a
Nordström, J., Nordin, N., and Henningson, D.: The fringe region technique
and the Fourier method used in the direct numerical simulation of spatially
evolving viscous flows, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20, 1365–1393,
1999. a
Pope, S. B.: Turbulent flows, Cambridge University Press, 2001. a
Quick, J., Annoni, J., King, R., Dykes, K., Fleming, P., and Ning, A.:
Optimization under uncertainty for wake steering strategies, J.
Phys.-Conf. Ser., 854, 012036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012036, 2017. a, b, c
Quick, J., King, J., King, R. N., Hamlington, P. E., and Dykes, K.: Wake steering optimization under uncertainty, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 413–426, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-413-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d
Rott, A., Doekemeijer, B., Seifert, J. K., van Wingerden, J.-W., and Kühn, M.: Robust active wake control in consideration of wind direction variability and uncertainty, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 869–882, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-869-2018, 2018. a, b
Salesky, S. T., Chamecki, M., and Bou-Zeid, E.: On the nature of the transition
between roll and cellular organization in the convective boundary layer,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 163, 41–68, 2017. a
Sanchez Gomez, M. and Lundquist, J. K.: The effect of wind direction shear on turbine performance in a wind farm in central Iowa, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 125–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-125-2020, 2020. a
Sanz Rodrigo, J., Chavez Arroyo, R. A., Moriarty, P., Churchfield, M.,
Kosović, B., Réthoré, P.-E., Hansen, K. S., Hahmann, A., Mirocha,
J. D., and Rife, D.: Mesoscale to microscale wind farm flow modeling and
evaluation, WIRES Energy Environ., 6, e214, https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.214,
2017a. a, b
Sanz Rodrigo, J., Churchfield, M., and Kosovic, B.: A methodology for the design and testing of atmospheric boundary layer models for wind energy applications, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 35–54, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-35-2017, 2017b. a
Schreiber, J., Bottasso, C. L., Salbert, B., and Campagnolo, F.: Improving wind farm flow models by learning from operational data, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 647–673, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-647-2020, 2020. a
Segalini, A. and Dahlberg, J.-Å.: Blockage effects in wind farms, Wind
Energy, 23, 120–128, 2020. a
Shapiro, C. R., Gayme, D. F., and Meneveau, C.: Modelling yawed wind turbine
wakes: a lifting line approach, J. Fluid Mech., 841, R1, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.75, 2018. a
Shapiro, C. R., Starke, G. M., Meneveau, C., and Gayme, D. F.: A Wake Modeling
Paradigm for Wind Farm Design and Control, Energies, 12, 2956, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152956, 2019. a
Simley, E., Fleming, P., and King, J.: Design and analysis of a wake steering controller with wind direction variability, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 451–468, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-451-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Simley, E., Fleming, P., King, J., and Sinner, M.: Wake steering wind farm
control with preview wind direction information, Tech. rep., National
Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States), https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC50511.2021.9483008, 2021. a, b
Starke, G. M., Meneveau, C., King, J. R., and Gayme, D. F.: The area localized
coupled model for analytical mean flow prediction in arbitrary wind farm
geometries, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 13, 033305, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0042573, 2021. a
Stull, R. B.: An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, vol. 13, Springer
Science & Business Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8, 2012. a
Sullivan, P. P., Horst, T. W., Lenschow, D. H., Moeng, C.-H., and Weil, J. C.:
Structure of subfilter-scale fluxes in the atmospheric surface layer with
application to large-eddy simulation modelling, J. Fluid Mech.,
482, 101–139, 2003. a
Sullivan, P. P., Weil, J. C., Patton, E. G., Jonker, H. J., and Mironov, D. V.:
Turbulent winds and temperature fronts in large-eddy simulations of the
stable atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 73,
1815–1840, 2016. a
Svensson, G. A. A. M. H., Holtslag, A. A. M., Kumar, V., Mauritsen, T., Steeneveld, G. J., Angevine, W. M., Bazile, E., Beljaars, A., De Bruijn, E. I. F., Cheng, A., and Conangla, L.: Evaluation of
the diurnal cycle in the atmospheric boundary layer over land as represented
by a variety of single-column models: The second GABLS experiment,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 140, 177–206, 2011. a
Thorpe, A. J. and Guymer, T. H.: The nocturnal jet, Quarterly Journal of the
Royal Meteorological Society, 103, 633–653, 1977. a
van der Laan, M. P., Kelly, M., and Baungaard, M.: A pressure-driven atmospheric boundary layer model satisfying Rossby and Reynolds number similarity, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 777–790, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-777-2021, 2021. a
Van de Wiel, B. J., Moene, A., Steeneveld, G., Baas, P., Bosveld, F., and
Holtslag, A.: A conceptual view on inertial oscillations and nocturnal
low-level jets, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2679–2689, 2010. a
Van Wijk, A., Beljaars, A., Holtslag, A., and Turkenburg, W.: Evaluation of
stability corrections in wind speed profiles over the North Sea, J.
Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 33, 551–566, 1990. a
Wharton, S. and Lundquist, J. K.: Assessing atmospheric stability and its
impacts on rotor-disk wind characteristics at an onshore wind farm, Wind
Energy, 15, 525–546, 2012a. a
Wharton, S. and Lundquist, J. K.: Atmospheric stability affects wind turbine
power collection, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 014005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014005,
2012b.
a
Wyngaard, J. C.: Turbulence in the Atmosphere, Cambridge University Press,
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840524, 2010. a, b
Zong, H. and Porté-Agel, F.: A momentum-conserving wake superposition
method for wind farm power prediction, J. Fluid Mech., 889, A8,
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.77, 2020. a, b
Short summary
Wake steering control, in which turbines are intentionally misaligned with the incident wind, has demonstrated potential to increase wind farm energy. We investigate wake steering control methods in simulations of a wind farm operating in the terrestrial diurnal cycle. We develop a statistical wind direction forecast to improve wake steering in flows with time-varying states. Closed-loop wake steering control increases wind farm energy production, compared to baseline and open-loop control.
Wake steering control, in which turbines are intentionally misaligned with the incident wind,...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint