Articles | Volume 3, issue 2
Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 929–946, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-929-2018
Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 929–946, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-929-2018
Research article
20 Dec 2018
Research article | 20 Dec 2018

Micro-scale model comparison (benchmark) at the moderately complex forested site Ryningsnäs

Stefan Ivanell et al.

Related authors

Classification and properties of non-idealized coastal wind profiles – an observational study
Christoffer Hallgren, Johan Arnqvist, Erik Nilsson, Stefan Ivanell, Metodija Shapkalijevski, August Thomasson, Heidi Pettersson, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1183–1207, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1183-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1183-2022, 2022
Short summary
The smoother the better? A comparison of six post-processing methods to improve short-term offshore wind power forecasts in the Baltic Sea
Christoffer Hallgren, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Ville Vakkari, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1205–1226, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1205-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1205-2021, 2021
Short summary
Global trends in the performance of large wind farms based on high-fidelity simulations
Søren Juhl Andersen, Simon-Philippe Breton, Björn Witha, Stefan Ivanell, and Jens Nørkær Sørensen
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1689–1703, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1689-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1689-2020, 2020
Short summary
Actuator line simulations of wind turbine wakes using the lattice Boltzmann method
Henrik Asmuth, Hugo Olivares-Espinosa, and Stefan Ivanell
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 623–645, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-623-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-623-2020, 2020
Short summary
Wind farm power production assessment: a comparative analysis of two actuator disc methods and two analytical wake models
Nikolaos Simisiroglou, Heracles Polatidis, and Stefan Ivanell
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2018-8,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2018-8, 2018
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Wind and turbulence
Evaluation of obstacle modelling approaches for resource assessment and small wind turbine siting: case study in the northern Netherlands
Caleb Phillips, Lindsay M. Sheridan, Patrick Conry, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Dmitry Duplyakin, Sagi Zisman, Nicolas Duboc, Matt Nelson, Rao Kotamarthi, Rod Linn, Marc Broersma, Timo Spijkerboer, and Heidi Tinnesand
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing and validating intra-farm and farm-to-farm wakes across different mesoscale and high-resolution wake models
Jana Fischereit, Kurt Schaldemose Hansen, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, and Juan Pablo Murcia Leon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1069–1091, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022, 2022
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation of airborne wind energy farms
Thomas Haas, Jochem De Schutter, Moritz Diehl, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1093–1135, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1093-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Investigation into boundary layer transition using wall-resolved large-eddy simulations and modeled inflow turbulence
Brandon Arthur Lobo, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, and Michael Breuer
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 967–990, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-967-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-967-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of the global-blockage effect on power performance through simulations and measurements
Alessandro Sebastiani, Alfredo Peña, Niels Troldborg, and Alexander Meyer Forsting
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 875–886, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-875-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-875-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Apsley, D. D. and Castro, I. P.: A limited-length-scale kϵ model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 83, 75–98, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000252210512, 1997. a, b
Arnqvist, J., Segalini, A., and Dellwik, E.: Wind Statistics from a Forested Landscape, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 156, 53–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0016-x, 2015. a, b, c, d
Avila, M., Codina, R., and Principe, J.: Finite element dynamical subgrid-scale model for low Mach number flows with radiative heat transfer, Int. J. Numer. Method H., 25, 1361–1384, 2015. a
Avila, M., Gargallo-Peiro, A., and Folch, A.: A CFD framework for offshore and onshore wind farm simulation, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 854, 012002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012002, 2017. a
Ayotte, K. W.: Computational Modelling For Wind Energy Assessment, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 96, 1571–1590, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.002, 2008. a
Download
Short summary
This article describes a study in which modellers were challenged to compute the wind at a forested site with moderately complex topography. The target was to match the measured wind profile at one exact location for three directions. The input to the models consisted of detailed information on forest densities and ground height. Overall, the article gives an overview of how well different types of models are able to capture the flow physics at a moderately complex forested site.