Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 441–460, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-441-2021
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 441–460, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-441-2021

Research article 19 Mar 2021

Research article | 19 Mar 2021

Validation of the dynamic wake meandering model with respect to loads and power production

Inga Reinwardt et al.

Related authors

Dynamic wake meandering model calibration using nacelle-mounted lidar systems
Inga Reinwardt, Levin Schilling, Peter Dalhoff, Dirk Steudel, and Michael Breuer
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 775–792, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-775-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-775-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Wind and turbulence
Correlations of power output fluctuations in an offshore wind farm using high-resolution SCADA data
Janna Kristina Seifert, Martin Kraft, Martin Kühn, and Laura J. Lukassen
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 997–1014, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-997-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-997-2021, 2021
Short summary
New methods to improve the vertical extrapolation of near-surface offshore wind speeds
Mike Optis, Nicola Bodini, Mithu Debnath, and Paula Doubrawa
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 935–948, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-935-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-935-2021, 2021
Short summary
Wind turbine load validation in wakes using wind field reconstruction techniques and nacelle lidar wind retrievals
Davide Conti, Vasilis Pettas, Nikolay Dimitrov, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 841–866, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-841-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-841-2021, 2021
Short summary
A pressure-driven atmospheric boundary layer model satisfying Rossby and Reynolds number similarity
Maarten Paul van der Laan, Mark Kelly, and Mads Baungaard
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 777–790, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-777-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-777-2021, 2021
Short summary
Design and analysis of a wake model for spatially heterogeneous flow
Alayna Farrell, Jennifer King, Caroline Draxl, Rafael Mudafort, Nicholas Hamilton, Christopher J. Bay, Paul Fleming, and Eric Simley
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 737–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-737-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-737-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Ainslie, J. F.: Calculating the flowfield in the wake of wind turbines, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 27, 213–224, 1988. a, b, c
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes, Renew. Energ., 70, 116–123, 2014. a, b, c
Burton, T.: Wind energy handbook, Wiley, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. a
Conti, D., Dimitrov, N., and Peña, A.: Aeroelastic load validation in wake conditions using nacelle-mounted lidar measurements, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1129–1154, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1129-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Dimitrov, N., Borraccino, A., Peña, A., Natarajan, A., and Mann, J.: Wind turbine load validation using lidar‐based wind retrievals, Wind Energy, 22, 1512–1533, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2385, 2019. a, b
Download
Short summary
This analysis validates the DWM model based on loads and power production measured at an onshore wind farm. Special focus is given to the performance of a version of the DWM model that was previously recalibrated with a lidar system at the site. The results of the recalibrated wake model agree very well with the measurements. Furthermore, lidar measurements of the wind speed deficit and the wake meandering are incorporated in the DWM model definition in order to decrease the uncertainties.