Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 441–460, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-441-2021
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 441–460, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-441-2021

Research article 19 Mar 2021

Research article | 19 Mar 2021

Validation of the dynamic wake meandering model with respect to loads and power production

Inga Reinwardt et al.

Related authors

Dynamic wake meandering model calibration using nacelle-mounted lidar systems
Inga Reinwardt, Levin Schilling, Peter Dalhoff, Dirk Steudel, and Michael Breuer
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 775–792, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-775-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-775-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Wind and turbulence
The 3 km Norwegian reanalysis (NORA3) – a validation of offshore wind resources in the North Sea and the Norwegian Sea
Ida Marie Solbrekke, Asgeir Sorteberg, and Hilde Haakenstad
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1501–1519, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1501-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1501-2021, 2021
Short summary
On turbulence models and lidar measurements for wind turbine control
Liang Dong, Wai Hou Lio, and Eric Simley
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1491–1500, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1491-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1491-2021, 2021
Short summary
Seasonal effects in the long-term correction of short-term wind measurements using reanalysis data
Alexander Basse, Doron Callies, Anselm Grötzner, and Lukas Pauscher
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1473–1490, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1473-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1473-2021, 2021
Short summary
On the effects of inter-farm interactions at the offshore wind farm Alpha Ventus
Vasilis Pettas, Matthias Kretschmer, Andrew Clifton, and Po Wen Cheng
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1455–1472, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1455-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1455-2021, 2021
Short summary
Satellite-based estimation of roughness lengths and displacement heights for wind resource modelling
Rogier Floors, Merete Badger, Ib Troen, Kenneth Grogan, and Finn-Hendrik Permien
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1379–1400, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1379-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1379-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Ainslie, J. F.: Calculating the flowfield in the wake of wind turbines, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 27, 213–224, 1988. a, b, c
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes, Renew. Energ., 70, 116–123, 2014. a, b, c
Burton, T.: Wind energy handbook, Wiley, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. a
Conti, D., Dimitrov, N., and Peña, A.: Aeroelastic load validation in wake conditions using nacelle-mounted lidar measurements, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1129–1154, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1129-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Dimitrov, N., Borraccino, A., Peña, A., Natarajan, A., and Mann, J.: Wind turbine load validation using lidar‐based wind retrievals, Wind Energy, 22, 1512–1533, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2385, 2019. a, b
Download
Short summary
This analysis validates the DWM model based on loads and power production measured at an onshore wind farm. Special focus is given to the performance of a version of the DWM model that was previously recalibrated with a lidar system at the site. The results of the recalibrated wake model agree very well with the measurements. Furthermore, lidar measurements of the wind speed deficit and the wake meandering are incorporated in the DWM model definition in order to decrease the uncertainties.