Articles | Volume 8, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-925-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-925-2023
Research article
 | 
06 Jun 2023
Research article |  | 06 Jun 2023

Quantification and correction of motion influence for nacelle-based lidar systems on floating wind turbines

Moritz Gräfe, Vasilis Pettas, Julia Gottschall, and Po Wen Cheng

Related authors

Machine-learning-based virtual load sensors for mooring lines using simulated motion and lidar measurements
Moritz Gräfe, Vasilis Pettas, Nikolay Dimitrov, and Po Wen Cheng
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2175–2193, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2175-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2175-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Characterization of local wind profiles: a random forest approach for enhanced wind profile extrapolation
Farkhondeh (Hanie) Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 143–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025, 2025
Short summary
Simulations suggest offshore wind farms modify low-level jets
Daphne Quint, Julie K. Lundquist, and David Rosencrans
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 117–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025, 2025
Short summary
On the lidar-turbulence paradox and possible countermeasures
Alfredo Peña, Ginka G. Yankova, and Vasiliki Mallini
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 83–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025, 2025
Short summary
The actuator farm model for large eddy simulation (LES) of wind-farm-induced atmospheric gravity waves and farm–farm interaction
Sebastiano Stipa, Arjun Ajay, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2301–2332, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2301-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2301-2024, 2024
Short summary
Understanding the impact of data gaps on long-term offshore wind resource estimates
Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2217–2233, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2217-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2217-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bischoff, O., Wolken-Möhlmann, G., and Cheng, P. W.: An approach and discussion of a simulation based measurement uncertainty estimation for a floating lidar system, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2265, 022077, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/2/022077, 2022. a
Borraccino, A., Schlipf, D., Haizmann, F., and Wagner, R.: Wind field reconstruction from nacelle-mounted lidar short-range measurements, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 269–283, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-269-2017, 2017. a
Bossanyi, E. A., Kumar, A., and Hugues-Salas, O.: Wind turbine control applications of turbine-mounted LIDAR, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 555, 012011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/555/1/012011, 2014. a
Browning, K. and Wexler, R.: The determination of kinematic properties of a wind field using Doppler radar, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 7, 105–113, 1968. a
BWIdeol: Floatgen Wind Power going further Offshore, FLOATGEN,, https://floatgen.eu/ (last access: 27 April 2023), 2019. a
Download
Short summary
Inflow wind field measurements from nacelle-based lidar systems offer great potential for different applications including turbine control, load validation and power performance measurements. On floating wind turbines nacelle-based lidar measurements are affected by the dynamic behavior of the floating foundations. Therefore, the effects on lidar wind speed measurements induced by floater dynamics must be well understood. A new model for quantification of these effects is introduced in our work.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint