Articles | Volume 6, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1015-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1015-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
28 Jul 2021
Research article |
| 28 Jul 2021
| 28 Jul 2021
WRF-simulated low-level jets over Iowa: characterization and sensitivity studies
Jeanie A. Aird
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell
University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Rebecca J. Barthelmie
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell
University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Tristan J. Shepherd
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University,
Ithaca, New York, USA
Sara C. Pryor
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University,
Ithaca, New York, USA
Related authors
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Ville Vakkari, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 821–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Knowing the wind speed across the rotor of a wind turbine is key in making good predictions of the power production. However, models struggle to capture both the speed and the shape of the wind profile. Using machine learning methods based on the model data, we show that the predictions can be improved drastically. The work focuses on three coastal sites, spread over the Northern Hemisphere (the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, and the US Atlantic coast) with similar results for all sites.
Rebecca Foody, Jacob Coburn, Jeanie A. Aird, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, and Sara C. Pryor
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 263–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using lidar-derived wind speed measurements at approx. 150 m height at onshore and offshore locations, we quantify the advantages of deploying wind turbines offshore in terms of the amount of electrical power produced and the higher reliability and predictability of the electrical power.
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1651–1658, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1651-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1651-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Low-level jets (LLJs) are special types of non-ideal wind profiles affecting both wind energy production and loads on a wind turbine. However, among LLJ researchers, there is no consensus regarding which definition to use to identify these profiles. In this work, we compare two different ways of identifying the LLJ – the falloff definition and the shear definition – and argue why the shear definition is better suited to wind energy applications.
Kelsey B. Thompson, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, and Sara C. Pryor
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-37, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-37, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines in offshore lease areas (LA) along the eastern U.S. may be impacted by hurricanes. Regional simulations with atmosphere-only and coupled atmosphere-ocean-wave regional models well reproduce historical hurricanes and indicate no exceedance of 50 m s-1 wind speeds in the LA and only brief periods with low power production. Coupled simulations lead to more intense hurricanes possibly indicating that previous atmosphere-only simulations underestimate the risk to offshore wind turbines.
Tristan Shepherd, Frederick Letson, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, and Sara C. Pryor
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4473–4505, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4473-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4473-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A historic derecho in the USA is presented. The 29 June 2012 derecho caused more than 20 deaths and millions of US dollars of damage. We use a regional climate model to understand how model fidelity changes under different initial conditions. We find changes drive different convective conditions, resulting in large variation in the simulated hazards. The variation using different reanalysis data shows that framing these results in the context of contemporary and future climate is a challenge.
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Ville Vakkari, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 821–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Knowing the wind speed across the rotor of a wind turbine is key in making good predictions of the power production. However, models struggle to capture both the speed and the shape of the wind profile. Using machine learning methods based on the model data, we show that the predictions can be improved drastically. The work focuses on three coastal sites, spread over the Northern Hemisphere (the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, and the US Atlantic coast) with similar results for all sites.
Rebecca Foody, Jacob Coburn, Jeanie A. Aird, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, and Sara C. Pryor
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 263–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using lidar-derived wind speed measurements at approx. 150 m height at onshore and offshore locations, we quantify the advantages of deploying wind turbines offshore in terms of the amount of electrical power produced and the higher reliability and predictability of the electrical power.
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1651–1658, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1651-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1651-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Low-level jets (LLJs) are special types of non-ideal wind profiles affecting both wind energy production and loads on a wind turbine. However, among LLJ researchers, there is no consensus regarding which definition to use to identify these profiles. In this work, we compare two different ways of identifying the LLJ – the falloff definition and the shear definition – and argue why the shear definition is better suited to wind energy applications.
Frederick W. Letson, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Kevin I. Hodges, and Sara C. Pryor
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2001–2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2001-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2001-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Windstorms during the last 40 years in the US Northeast are identified and characterized using the spatial extent of extreme wind speeds at 100 m height from the ERA5 reanalysis. During all of the top 10 windstorms, wind speeds exceeding the local 99.9th percentile cover at least one-third of the land area in this high-population-density region. These 10 storms followed frequently observed cyclone tracks but have intensities 5–10 times the mean values for cyclones affecting this region.
Cited articles
Aird, J. A., Barthelmie, R. J., Shepherd, T. J., and Pryor, S. C.:
WRF-Simulated Springtime Low-Level Jets Over Iowa: Implications for Wind
Energy, J. Phys. Conf.-Ser., 1618, 062020,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062020, 2020.
American Clean Power: US Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2019 Market Report, available at: https://cleanpower.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ACP_MarketReport_4Q2020.pdf (last access: 20 March 2021), 2020.
Andreas, E. L., Claffey, K. J., and Makshtas, A. P.: Low-level atmospheric
jets and inversions over the western Weddell Sea, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 97, 459–486, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002793831076, 2000.
Baas, P., Bosveld, F. C., Klein Baltink, H., and Holtslag, A. A. M.: A
climatology of nocturnal low-level jets at Cabauw, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 1627–1642, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC1965.1, 2009.
Banta, R. M., Newsom, R. K., Lundquist, J. K., Pichugina, Y. L., Coulter, R.
L., and Mahrt, L.: Nocturnal Low-Level Jet Characteristics Over Kansas During Cases-99, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 105, 221–252, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019992330866, 2002.
Barthelmie, R. J., Hansen, K. S., and Pryor, S. C.: Meteorological controls
on wind turbine wakes, Proc. IEEE, 101, 1010–1019, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2204029, 2013.
Barthelmie, R. J., Shepherd, T. J., Aird, J. A., and Pryor, S. C.: Power and
Wind Shear Implications of Large Wind Turbine Scenarios in the US Central
Plains, Energies, 13, 4269, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13164269, 2020.
Beljaars, A.: The parametrization of surface fluxes in large-scale models
under free convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 121, 255–270,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152203, 1995.
Berg, L. K., Riihimaki, L. D., Qian, Y., Yan, H., and Huang, M.: The low-level jet over the Southern Great Plains determined from observations and
reanalyses and its impact on moisture transport, J. Climate, 28, 6682–6706, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00719.1, 2015.
Blackadar, A. K.: Boundary Layer Wind Maxima and Their Significance for the Growth of Nocturnal Inversions, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 38, 283–290, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-38.5.283, 1957.
Bonner, W. D.: Climatology of the Low Level Jet, Mon. Weather Rev., 96, 833–850, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1968)096<0833:cotllj>2.0.co;2, 1968.
Chen, T. C. and Kpaeyeh, J. A.: The synoptic-scale environment associated with the low-level jet of the Great Plains, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 416–420, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<0416:tsseaw>2.0.co;2, 1993.
Duarte, H. F., Leclerc, M. Y., and Zhang, G.: Assessing the shear-sheltering
theory applied to low-level jets in the nocturnal stable boundary layer, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 110, 359–371, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0621-2, 2012.
Gadde, S. N. and Stevens, R. J.: Effect of low-level jet height on wind farm performance, J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, 13, 013305, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0026232, 2021.
Gevorgyan, A.: A Case Study of Low-Level Jets in Yerevan Simulated by the WRF Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 300–314, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027629, 2018.
Grachev, A. A., Andreas, E. L., Fairall, C. W., Guest, P. S., and Persson, P. O. G.: The critical Richardson number and limits of applicability of local similarity theory in the stable boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 147, 51–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9771-0, 2012.
Gutierrez, W., Araya, G., Basu, S., Ruiz-Columbie, A., and Castillo, L.:
Toward Understanding Low Level Jet Climatology over West Texas and its Impact on Wind Energy, J. Phys. Conf.-Ser., 524, 012008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012008, 2014.
Gutierrez, W., Ruiz-Columbie, A., Tutkun, M., and Castillo, L.: Impacts of the low-level jet's negative wind shear on the wind turbine, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 533–545, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-533-2017, 2017.
Hallgren, C., Arnqvist, J., Ivanell, S., Körnich, H., Vakkari, V., and
Sahlée, E.: Looking for an offshore low-level jet champion among recent
reanalyses: a tight race over the Baltic Sea, Energies, 13, 3670,
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143670, 2020.
Helbig, N., Mott, R., Van Herwijnen, A., Winstral, A., and Jonas, T.:
Parameterizing surface wind speed over complex topography, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 651–667, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025593, 2016.
Higgins, R. W., Yao, Y., Yarosh, E. S., Janowiak, J. E., and Mo, K. C.:
Influence of the Great Plains low-level jet on summertime precipitation and
moisture transport over the central United States, J. Climate, 10, 481–507, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<0481:IOTGPL>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Hoen, B. D., Diffendorfer, J. E., Rand, J. T., Kramer, L. A., Garrity, C. P., and Hunt, H. E.: United States Wind Turbine Database (v4.1), US Geological Survey, American Clean Power Association, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7TX3DN0, 2021.
Holton, J. R.: The diurnal boundary layer wind oscillation above sloping terrain, Tellus, 19, 200–205, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v19i2.9766, 1967.
Jahn, D. E. and Gallus, W. A.: Impacts of Modifications to a Local Planetary
Boundary Layer Scheme on Forecasts of the Great Plains Low-Level Jet Environment, Weather Forecast., 33, 1109–1120, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0036.1, 2018.
Jiang, X., Lau, N. C., Held, I. M,. and Ploshay, J. J.: Mechanisms of the Great Plains low-level jet as simulated in an AGCM, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 532–547, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3847.1, 2007.
Jiménez-Sánchez, G., Markowski, P. M., Jewtoukoff, V., Young, G. S.,
and Stensrud, D. J.: The Orinoco Low-Level Jet: An Investigation of Its
Characteristics and Evolution Using the WRF Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
124, 10696–10711, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030934, 2019.
Kalverla, P. C., Duncan, J. B., Steeneveld, G. J., and Holtslag, A. A. M.:
Low-level jets over the north sea based on ERA5 and observations: Together
they do better, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 193–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-193-2019, 2019.
Kelley, N. D., Jonkman, B. J., Scott, G. N., Bialasiewicz, J. T., and Redmond, L. S.: Impact of coherent turbulence on wind turbine aeroelastic
response and its simulation, No. NREL/CP-500-38074, NREL – National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, USA, 2005.
Krishnamurthy, L., Vecchi, G. A., Msadek, R., Wittenberg, A., Delworth, T. L., and Zeng, F.: The seasonality of the great plains low-level Jet and ENSO
relationship, J. Climate, 28, 4525–4544, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00590.1,
2015.
Lackmann, G. M.: Cold-fontal potential vorticity maxima, the low-level jet, and moisture transport in extratropical cyclones, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 59-74, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<0059:CFPVMT>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Lampert, A., Bernalte Jimenez, B., Gross, G., Wulff, D., and Kenull, T.:
One-year observations of the wind distribution and low-level jet occurrence at Braunschweig, North German Plain, Wind Energy, 19, 1807–1817,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1951, 2016.
Liang, Y. C., Yu, J. Y., Lo, M. H., and Wang, C.: The changing influence of
El Niño on the Great Plains low-level jet, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 16, 512–517, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.590, 2015.
Markowski, P. and Richardson, Y.: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes,
Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 2011.
Mitchell, M. J., Arritt, R. W., and Labas, K.: A climatology of the warm season Great Plains low-level jet using wind profiler observations, Weather
Forecast., 10, 576–591, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010<0576:ACOTWS>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Mortarini, L., Cava, D., Giostra, U., Acevedo, O., Nogueira Martins, L., Soares de Oliveira, P., and Anfossi, D.: Observations of submeso motions and
intermittent turbulent mixing across a low level jet with a 132-m tower, Q.
J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 144, 172–183, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3192, 2018.
Nakanishi, M. and Niino, H.: An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model: Its
numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 119, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8, 2006.
Nunalee, C. G. and Basu, S.: Mesoscale modeling of coastal low-level jets:
implications for offshore wind resource estimation, Wind Energy, 17, 1199–1216, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1628, 2014.
Parish, T. R.: Barrier winds along the Sierra Nevada mountains, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 21, 925–930, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1982)021<0925:BWATSN>2.0.CO;2, 1982.
Prabha, T. V., Goswami, B. N., Murthy, B. S., and Kulkarni, J. R.: Nocturnal
low-level jet and “atmospheric streams” over the rain shadow region of indian western ghats, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 1273–1287,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.818, 2011.
Prósper, M. A., Otero-Casal, C., Fernández, F. C., and Miguez-Macho,
G.: Wind power forecasting for a real onshore wind farm on complex terrain
using WRF high resolution simulations, Renew. Energy, 135, 674–686,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.047, 2019.
Pryor, S. C., Shepherd, T. J., Bukovsky, M., and Barthelmie, R. J.: Assessing the stability of wind resource and operating conditions, J. Phys. Conf.-Ser., 1452, 012084, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012084, 2020a.
Pryor, S. C., Barthelmie, R. J., Bukovsky, M. S., Leung, L. R., and Sakaguchi, K.: Climate change impacts on wind power generation, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 627–643, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0101-7, 2020b.
Pryor, S. C., Shepherd, T. J., Volker, P. J. H., Hahmann, A. N., and Barthelmie, R. J.: “Wind Theft” from onshore wind turbine arrays:
Sensitivity to wind farm parameterization and resolution, J. Appl. Meteorol.
Clim., 59, 153–174, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0235.1, 2020c.
Rife, D. L., Pinto, J. O., Monaghan, A. J., Davis, C. A., and Hannan, J. R.: Global distribution and characteristics of diurnally varying low-level jets, J. Climate, 23, 5041–5064, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3514.1, 2010.
Salvação, N. and Soares, C. G.: Wind resource assessment offshore
the Atlantic Iberian coast with the WRF model, Energy, 145, 276–287,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.101, 2018.
Schepanski, K., Knippertz, P., Fiedler, S., Timouk, F., and Demarty, J.: The
sensitivity of nocturnal low-level jets and near-surface winds over the Sahel to model resolution, initial conditions and boundary-layer set-up, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 1442–1456, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2453, 2015.
Smith, E. N., Gibbs, J. A., Fedorovich, E., and Klein, P. M.: WRF Model study of the Great Plains low-level jet: Effects of grid spacing and boundary layer parameterization, J. Appl. Meteorol., 57, 2375–2397, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0361.1, 2018.
Song, J., Liao, K., Coulter, R. L., and Lesht, B. M.: Climatology of the
low-level jet at the southern Great Plains atmospheric boundary layer experiments site, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1593–1606, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2294.1, 2005.
Squitieri, B. J. and Gallus, W. A.: WRF forecasts of Great Plains nocturnal
low-level jet-driven MCSs. Part II: Differences between strongly and weakly
forced low-level jet environments, Weather Forecast., 31, 1491–1510,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0150.1, 2016.
Storm, B., Dudhia, J., Basu, S., Swift, A., and Giammanco, I.: Evaluation of
the weather research and forecasting model on forecasting low-level jets:
Implications for wind energy, Wind Energy, 12, 81–90, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.288,
2008.
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1988.
Tay, K., Koh, T. Y., and Skote, M.: Characterizing mesoscale variability in low-level jet simulations for CBLAST-LOW 2001 campaign, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 133, 163–179, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-020-00736-3, 2020.
Tewari, M., Chen, F., Wang, W., Dudhia, J., LeMone, M., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Gayno, G., Wegiel, J., and Cuenca, R.: Implementation and verification of the unified NOAH land surface modelin the WRF model, in: 20th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/16th Conference on Numerical Weather
Prediction, 12–16 January 2004, Seattle, WA, 1115, 10–15, 2004.
Udina, M., Soler, M. R., Viana, S., and Yagüe, C.: Model simulation of
gravity waves triggered by a density current, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 139, 701–714, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2004, 2012.
Vanderwende, B. J., Lundquist, J. K., Rhodes, M. E., Takle, E. S., and Irvin, S. L.: Observing and Simulating the Summertime Low-Level Jet in Central Iowa, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 2319–2336, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00325.1, 2015.
Wagner, D., Steinfeld, G., Witha, B., Wurps, H., and Reuder, J.: Low level
jets over the southern North Sea, Meteorol. Z., 28, 389–415,
https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2019/0948, 2019.
Walton, R. A., Takle, E. S., and Gallus, W. A.: Characteristics of 50–200 m
winds and temperatures derived from an Iowa tall-tower network, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 53, 2387–2393, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0340.1, 2014.
Weaver, S. J. and Nigam, S.: Variability of the Great Plains low-level jet:
Large-scale circulation context and hydroclimate impacts, J. Climate, 21,
1532–1551, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1586.1, 2008.
Weaver, S. J., Schubert, S., and Wang, H.: Warm season variations in the
low-level circulation and precipitation over the central United States in
observations, AMIP simulations, and idealized SST experiments, J. Climate, 22, 5401–5420, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2984.1, 2009.
Whiteman, C. D., Bian, X., and Zhong, S.: Low-Level Jet Climatology from
Enhanced Rawinsonde Observations at a Site in the Southern Great Plains, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 36, 1363–1376, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1363:LLJCFE>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Zhang, C., Wang, Y., and Xue, M.: Evaluation of an E–ε and Three Other Boundary Layer Parametrization Schemes in the WRF Model over the Southeast Pacific and the Southern Great Plains, Mon. Weather Rev., 148,
1121–1145, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0084.1, 2020.
Short summary
Low-level jets (LLJs) are pronounced maxima in wind speed profiles affecting wind turbine performance and longevity. We present a climatology of LLJs over Iowa using output from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and determine the rotor plane conditions when they occur. LLJ characteristics are highly sensitive to the identification criteria applied, and different (unique) LLJs are extracted with each criterion. LLJ characteristics also vary with different model output resolution.
Low-level jets (LLJs) are pronounced maxima in wind speed profiles affecting wind turbine...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint