Articles | Volume 6, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-949-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-949-2021
Research article
 | 
23 Jun 2021
Research article |  | 23 Jun 2021

Optimal scheduling of the next preventive maintenance activity for a wind farm

Quanjiang Yu, Michael Patriksson, and Serik Sagitov

Related subject area

Design methods, reliability and uncertainty modelling
Effectively using multifidelity optimization for wind turbine design
John Jasa, Pietro Bortolotti, Daniel Zalkind, and Garrett Barter
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 991–1006, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-991-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-991-2022, 2022
Short summary
Efficient Bayesian calibration of aerodynamic wind turbine models using surrogate modeling
Benjamin Sanderse, Vinit V. Dighe, Koen Boorsma, and Gerard Schepers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 759–781, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-759-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-759-2022, 2022
Short summary
Fast yaw optimization for wind plant wake steering using Boolean yaw angles
Andrew P. J. Stanley, Christopher Bay, Rafael Mudafort, and Paul Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 741–757, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-741-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-741-2022, 2022
Short summary
A simplified, efficient approach to hybrid wind and solar plant site optimization
Charles Tripp, Darice Guittet, Jennifer King, and Aaron Barker
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 697–713, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-697-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-697-2022, 2022
Short summary
Influence of wind turbine design parameters on linearized physics-based models in OpenFAST
Jason M. Jonkman, Emmanuel S. P. Branlard, and John P. Jasa
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 559–571, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Andreasson, N., Patriksson, M., and Evgrafov, A.: An introduction to continuous optimization: foundations and fundamental algorithms, Courier Dover Publications, Dover, 2020. a
Browell, J., Dinwoodie, I., and McMillan, D.: Forecasting for day-ahead offshore maintenance scheduling under uncertainty, in: Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability (ESREL) Conference, September 2016, University of Strathclyde, Strathclyde, 2016. a
Grimmett, G. and Stirzaker, D.: Probability and random processes, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2020. a
Guo, H., Watson, S., Tavner, P., and Xiang, J.: Reliability analysis for wind turbines with incomplete failure data collected from after the date of initial installation, Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Safe., 94, 1057–1063, 2009. a
Gustavsson, E., Patriksson, M., Strömberg, A.-B., Wojciechowski, A., and Önnheim, M.: Preventive maintenance scheduling of multi-component systems with interval costs, Comput. Indust. Eng., 76, 390–400, 2014. a, b, c, d, e
Download
Short summary
There are two ways to maintain a multi-component system: corrective maintenance, when a broken component is replaced with a new one, and preventive maintenance (PM), when some components are replaced in a planned manner before they break down. This article proposes a mathematical model for finding an optimal time to perform the next PM activity and selecting the components which should be replaced. The model is fast to solve, and it can be used as a key module in a maintenance scheduling app.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint