Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1507–1519, 2020

Special issue: Wind Energy Science Conference 2019

Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1507–1519, 2020
Research article
06 Nov 2020
Research article | 06 Nov 2020

Evaluation of the lattice Boltzmann method for wind modelling in complex terrain

Alain Schubiger et al.

Related authors

A new method for the pragmatic choice of wind models for Wind Resource Assessment in complex terrain
Sarah Barber, Alain Schubiger, Natalie Wagenbrenner, Nicolas Fatras, and Henrik Nordborg
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss.,,, 2020
Publication in WES not foreseen
Short summary

Related subject area

Wind and turbulence
Evaluation of obstacle modelling approaches for resource assessment and small wind turbine siting: case study in the northern Netherlands
Caleb Phillips, Lindsay M. Sheridan, Patrick Conry, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Dmitry Duplyakin, Sagi Zisman, Nicolas Duboc, Matt Nelson, Rao Kotamarthi, Rod Linn, Marc Broersma, Timo Spijkerboer, and Heidi Tinnesand
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169,,, 2022
Short summary
Comparing and validating intra-farm and farm-to-farm wakes across different mesoscale and high-resolution wake models
Jana Fischereit, Kurt Schaldemose Hansen, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, and Juan Pablo Murcia Leon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1069–1091,,, 2022
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation of airborne wind energy farms
Thomas Haas, Jochem De Schutter, Moritz Diehl, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1093–1135,,, 2022
Short summary
Investigation into boundary layer transition using wall-resolved large-eddy simulations and modeled inflow turbulence
Brandon Arthur Lobo, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, and Michael Breuer
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 967–990,,, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of the global-blockage effect on power performance through simulations and measurements
Alessandro Sebastiani, Alfredo Peña, Niels Troldborg, and Alexander Meyer Forsting
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 875–886,,, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ansumali, S. and Karlin, I. V.: Stabilization of the lattice Boltzmann method by the H theorem: A numerical test, Phys. Rev. E, 62, 7999,, 2000. a
ANSYS: Fluent Theory Guide, available at: (last access: 14 May 2020), 2019. a
Asmuth, H., Olivares-Espinosa, H., Nilsson, K., and Ivanell, S.: The Actuator Line Model in Lattice Boltzmann Frameworks: Numerical Sensitivity and Computational Performance, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1256, 012022,, 2019. a, b, c
Barber, S.: Comparison metrics microscale simulation challenge for wind resource assessment – stage 1, zenodo,, 2020. a
Bechmann, A.: WAsP CFD A new beginning in wind resource assessment, Tech. rep., Riso National Laboratory, Denmark, 2012. a
Short summary
A large-eddy simulation using the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) Palabos framework was implemented to calculate the wind field over the complex terrain of Bolund Hill. The results were compared to Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and detached-eddy simulation (DES) using Ansys Fluent and field measurements. A comparison of the three methods' computational costs has shown that the LBM, even though not yet fully optimised, can perform 5 times faster than DES and lead to reasonably accurate results.