Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-505-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-505-2021
Research article
 | 
12 Apr 2021
Research article |  | 12 Apr 2021

Understanding and mitigating the impact of data gaps on offshore wind resource estimates

Julia Gottschall and Martin Dörenkämper

Related authors

The rotor as a sensor – observing shear and veer from the operational data of a large wind turbine
Marta Bertelè, Paul J. Meyer, Carlo R. Sucameli, Johannes Fricke, Anna Wegner, Julia Gottschall, and Carlo L. Bottasso
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1419–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1419-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1419-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ship-based lidar measurements for validating ASCAT-derived and ERA5 offshore wind profiles
Hugo Rubio, Daniel Hatfield, Charlotte Bay Hasager, Martin Kühn, and Julia Gottschall
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-11,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-11, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for AMT
Short summary
Characterization of Local Wind Profiles: A Random Forest Approach for Enhanced Wind Profile Extrapolation
Farkhondeh Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-178,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-178, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Understanding the impact of data gaps on long-term offshore wind resource estimates
Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-127,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-127, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Quantification and correction of motion influence for nacelle-based lidar systems on floating wind turbines
Moritz Gräfe, Vasilis Pettas, Julia Gottschall, and Po Wen Cheng
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 925–946, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-925-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-925-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Wind and turbulence
Evaluation of obstacle modelling approaches for resource assessment and small wind turbine siting: case study in the northern Netherlands
Caleb Phillips, Lindsay M. Sheridan, Patrick Conry, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Dmitry Duplyakin, Sagi Zisman, Nicolas Duboc, Matt Nelson, Rao Kotamarthi, Rod Linn, Marc Broersma, Timo Spijkerboer, and Heidi Tinnesand
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing and validating intra-farm and farm-to-farm wakes across different mesoscale and high-resolution wake models
Jana Fischereit, Kurt Schaldemose Hansen, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, and Juan Pablo Murcia Leon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1069–1091, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022, 2022
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation of airborne wind energy farms
Thomas Haas, Jochem De Schutter, Moritz Diehl, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1093–1135, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1093-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Investigation into boundary layer transition using wall-resolved large-eddy simulations and modeled inflow turbulence
Brandon Arthur Lobo, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, and Michael Breuer
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 967–990, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-967-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-967-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of the global-blockage effect on power performance through simulations and measurements
Alessandro Sebastiani, Alfredo Peña, Niels Troldborg, and Alexander Meyer Forsting
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 875–886, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-875-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-875-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Baas, P., Bosveld, F. C., and Burgers, G.: The impact of atmospheric stability on the near-surface wind over sea in storm conditions, Wind Energy, 19, 187–198, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1825, 2016. a
Carta, J. A., Velázquez, S., and Cabrera, P.: A review of measure-correlate-predict (MCP) methods used to estimate long-term wind characteristics at a target site, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 27, 362–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.004, 2013. a, b
Chang, T. P.: Performance comparison of six numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy application, Appl. Energ., 88, 272–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.06.018, 2011. a
Copernicus CDS: Copernicus Climate Data Store, available at: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels?tab=overview, last access: 8 April 2021. a
Copernicus CMS: Copernicus Marine Service, available at: https://resources.marine.copernicus.eu/?option=com_csw&view=details&product_id=SST_GLO_SST_L4_NRT_OBSERVATIONS_010_001, last access: 8 April 2021. a
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint