Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-741-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-741-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
31 Mar 2022
Research article |
| 31 Mar 2022
| 31 Mar 2022
Fast yaw optimization for wind plant wake steering using Boolean yaw angles
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, National Wind Technology Center, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
Christopher Bay
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, National Wind Technology Center, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
Rafael Mudafort
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, National Wind Technology Center, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
Paul Fleming
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, National Wind Technology Center, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
Related authors
Jared J. Thomas, Christopher J. Bay, Andrew P. J. Stanley, and Andrew Ning
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-4, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-4, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We wanted to determine if and how optimization algorithms may be exploiting inaccuracies in the simple models used for wind farm layout optimization. Comparing optimization results from a simple model to large-eddy simulations showed that even a simple model provides enough information for optimizers to find good layouts. However, varying the number of wind directions in the optimization showed that the wind resource discretization can negatively impact the optimization results.
Andrew P. J. Stanley, Jennifer King, Christopher Bay, and Andrew Ning
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 433–454, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-433-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we present a computationally inexpensive model to calculate wind turbine blade fatigue caused by waking and partial waking. The model accounts for steady state on the blade, as well as wind turbulence. The model is fast enough to be used in wind farm layout optimization, which has not been possible with more expensive fatigue models in the past. The methods introduced in this paper will allow for farms with increased energy production that maintain turbine structural reliability.
Andrew P. J. Stanley, Owen Roberts, Jennifer King, and Christopher J. Bay
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1143–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1143-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1143-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farm layout optimization is an essential part of wind farm design. In this paper, we present different methods to determine the number of turbines in a wind farm, as well as their placement. Also in this paper we explore the effect that the objective function has on the wind farm design and found that wind farm layout is highly sensitive to the objective. The optimal number of turbines can vary greatly, from 15 to 54 for the cases in this paper, depending on the metric that is optimized.
Kenneth Brown, Gopal Yalla, Lawrence Cheung, Joeri Frederik, Dan Houck, Nathaniel deVelder, Eric Simley, and Paul Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1737–1762, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1737-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1737-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents one half of a companion paper series that studies strategies to reduce negative aerodynamic interference (i.e., wake effects) between nearby wind turbines in a wind farm. The approach leverages high-fidelity flow simulations of an open-source design for a wind turbine. Complimenting the companion paper’s analysis of the power and loading effects of the wake-control strategies, this article uncovers the underlying fluid-dynamic causes for these effects.
Geng Xia, Mike Optis, Georgios Deskos, Michael Sinner, Daniel Mulas Hernando, Julie Kay Lundquist, Andrew Kumler, Miguel Sanchez Gomez, Paul Fleming, and Walter Musial
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-154, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-154, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines energy losses from cluster wakes in offshore wind farms along the U.S. East Coast. Simulations based on real lease projects show that large wind speed deficits do not always cause equally large energy losses. The energy loss method revealed wake areas up to 30 % larger than traditional estimates, underscoring the need to consider both wind speed deficit and energy loss in planning offshore wind development.
Cory Frontin, Jeff Allen, Christopher J. Bay, Jared Thomas, Ethan Young, and Pietro Bortolotti
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-103, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-103, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farms produce energy and to do so have to occupy a non-trivial amount of space. Understanding how much energy a proposed wind farm will make (and at what cost) is technically challenging, especially when turbines are packed closely together. Plus, there's a key tradeoff in how much space a farm occupies and how cheap the energy it can produce might be: less space means more costly energy. This work shows an novel way to run computational simulations efficiently to understand that tradeoff.
Marcus Becker, Maxime Lejeune, Philippe Chatelain, Dries Allaerts, Rafael Mudafort, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1055–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1055-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1055-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Established turbine wake models are steady-state. This paper presents an open-source dynamic wake modeling framework that complements established steady-state wake models with dynamics. It is advantageous over steady-state wake models to describe wind farm power and energy over shorter periods. The model enables researchers to investigate the effectiveness of wind farm flow control strategies. This leads to a better utilization of wind farms and allows them to be used to their fullest extent.
Regis Thedin, Garrett Barter, Jason Jonkman, Rafael Mudafort, Christopher J. Bay, Kelsey Shaler, and Jasper Kreeft
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1033–1053, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1033-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1033-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate asymmetries in terms of power performance and fatigue loading on a five-turbine wind farm subject to wake steering strategies. Both the yaw misalignment angle and the wind direction were varied from negative to positive. We highlight conditions in which fatigue loading is lower while still maintaining good power gains and show that a partial wake is the source of the asymmetries observed. We provide recommendations in terms of yaw misalignment angles for a given wind direction.
Joeri A. Frederik, Eric Simley, Kenneth A. Brown, Gopal R. Yalla, Lawrence C. Cheung, and Paul A. Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 755–777, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-755-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-755-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we present results from advanced computer simulations to determine the effects of applying different control strategies to a small wind farm. We show that when there is variability in wind direction over height, steering the wake of a turbine away from other turbines is the most effective strategy. When this variability is not present, actively changing the pitch angle of the blades to increase turbulence in the wake could be more effective.
James Cutler, Christopher Bay, and Andrew Ning
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-172, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-172, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares two methods for modeling wakes from tilted wind turbines. An optimized analytical model improves accuracy but is limited by assumptions about wake shape. In contrast, a deep learning approach captures complex wake patterns without these constraints, matching high-fidelity simulations with minimal computational effort. The comparison highlights the potential of deep learning to transform wake modeling, offering greater accuracy and efficiency for wind energy optimization.
Eric Simley, Dev Millstein, Seongeun Jeong, and Paul Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 219–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wake steering is a wind farm control technology in which turbines are misaligned with the wind to deflect their wakes away from downstream turbines, increasing total power production. In this paper, we use a wind farm control model and historical electricity prices to assess the potential increase in market value from wake steering for 15 US wind plants. For most plants, we find that the relative increase in revenue from wake steering exceeds the relative increase in energy production.
Andrew P. J. Stanley, Christopher J. Bay, and Paul Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1341–1350, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1341-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1341-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Better wind farms can be built by simultaneously optimizing turbine locations and control, which is currently impossible or extremely challenging because of the size of the problem. The authors present a method to determine optimal wind farm control as a function of the turbine locations, which enables turbine layout and control to be optimized together by drastically reducing the size of the problem. In an example, a wind farm's performance improves by 0.8 % when optimized with the new method.
Jared J. Thomas, Nicholas F. Baker, Paul Malisani, Erik Quaeghebeur, Sebastian Sanchez Perez-Moreno, John Jasa, Christopher Bay, Federico Tilli, David Bieniek, Nick Robinson, Andrew P. J. Stanley, Wesley Holt, and Andrew Ning
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 865–891, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-865-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work compares eight optimization algorithms (including gradient-based, gradient-free, and hybrid) on a wind farm optimization problem with 4 discrete regions, concave boundaries, and 81 wind turbines. Algorithms were each run by researchers experienced with that algorithm. Optimized layouts were unique but with similar annual energy production. Common characteristics included tightly-spaced turbines on the outer perimeter and turbines loosely spaced and roughly on a grid in the interior.
Christopher J. Bay, Paul Fleming, Bart Doekemeijer, Jennifer King, Matt Churchfield, and Rafael Mudafort
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 401–419, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-401-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-401-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the cumulative-curl wake model that allows for the fast and accurate prediction of wind farm energy production wake interactions. The cumulative-curl model expands several existing wake models to make the simulation of farms more accurate and is implemented in a computationally efficient manner such that it can be used for wind farm layout design and controller development. The model is validated against high-fidelity simulations and data from physical wind farms.
Johan Meyers, Carlo Bottasso, Katherine Dykes, Paul Fleming, Pieter Gebraad, Gregor Giebel, Tuhfe Göçmen, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2271–2306, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and the outstanding challenges in wind farm flow control, thus identifying the key research areas that could further enable commercial uptake and success. To this end, we have structured the discussion on challenges and opportunities into four main areas: (1) insight into control flow physics, (2) algorithms and AI, (3) validation and industry implementation, and (4) integrating control with system design
(co-design).
Michael J. LoCascio, Christopher J. Bay, Majid Bastankhah, Garrett E. Barter, Paul A. Fleming, and Luis A. Martínez-Tossas
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1137–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1137-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1137-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work introduces the FLOW Estimation and Rose Superposition (FLOWERS) wind turbine wake model. This model analytically integrates the wake over wind directions to provide a time-averaged flow field. This new formulation is used to perform layout optimization. The FLOWERS model provides a smooth flow field over an entire wind plant at fraction of the computational cost of the standard numerical integration approach.
Jared J. Thomas, Christopher J. Bay, Andrew P. J. Stanley, and Andrew Ning
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-4, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-4, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We wanted to determine if and how optimization algorithms may be exploiting inaccuracies in the simple models used for wind farm layout optimization. Comparing optimization results from a simple model to large-eddy simulations showed that even a simple model provides enough information for optimizers to find good layouts. However, varying the number of wind directions in the optimization showed that the wind resource discretization can negatively impact the optimization results.
Andrew P. J. Stanley, Jennifer King, Christopher Bay, and Andrew Ning
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 433–454, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-433-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we present a computationally inexpensive model to calculate wind turbine blade fatigue caused by waking and partial waking. The model accounts for steady state on the blade, as well as wind turbulence. The model is fast enough to be used in wind farm layout optimization, which has not been possible with more expensive fatigue models in the past. The methods introduced in this paper will allow for farms with increased energy production that maintain turbine structural reliability.
Paul Fleming, Michael Sinner, Tom Young, Marine Lannic, Jennifer King, Eric Simley, and Bart Doekemeijer
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1521–1531, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1521-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1521-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The paper presents a new validation campaign of wake steering at a commercial wind farm. The campaign uses fixed yaw offset positions, rather than a table of optimal yaw offsets dependent on wind direction, to enable comparison with engineering models of wake steering. Additionally, by applying the same offset in beneficial and detrimental conditions, we are able to collect important data for assessing second-order wake model predictions.
Eric Simley, Paul Fleming, Nicolas Girard, Lucas Alloin, Emma Godefroy, and Thomas Duc
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1427–1453, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1427-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1427-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Wake steering is a wind farm control strategy in which upstream wind turbines are misaligned with the wind to deflect their low-velocity wakes away from downstream turbines, increasing overall power production. Here, we present results from a two-turbine wake-steering experiment at a commercial wind plant. By analyzing the wind speed dependence of wake steering, we find that the energy gained tends to increase for higher wind speeds because of both the wind conditions and turbine operation.
Andrew P. J. Stanley, Owen Roberts, Jennifer King, and Christopher J. Bay
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1143–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1143-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1143-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farm layout optimization is an essential part of wind farm design. In this paper, we present different methods to determine the number of turbines in a wind farm, as well as their placement. Also in this paper we explore the effect that the objective function has on the wind farm design and found that wind farm layout is highly sensitive to the objective. The optimal number of turbines can vary greatly, from 15 to 54 for the cases in this paper, depending on the metric that is optimized.
Alayna Farrell, Jennifer King, Caroline Draxl, Rafael Mudafort, Nicholas Hamilton, Christopher J. Bay, Paul Fleming, and Eric Simley
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 737–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-737-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-737-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Most current wind turbine wake models struggle to accurately simulate spatially variant wind conditions at a low computational cost. In this paper, we present an adaptation of NREL's FLOw Redirection and Induction in Steady State (FLORIS) wake model, which calculates wake losses in a heterogeneous flow field using local weather measurement inputs. Two validation studies are presented where the adapted model consistently outperforms previous versions of FLORIS that simulated uniform flow only.
Jennifer King, Paul Fleming, Ryan King, Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Christopher J. Bay, Rafael Mudafort, and Eric Simley
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 701–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-701-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-701-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper highlights the secondary effects of wake steering, including yaw-added wake recovery and secondary steering. These effects enhance the value of wake steering especially when applied to a large wind farm. This paper models these secondary effects using an analytical model proposed in the paper. The results of this model are compared with large-eddy simulations for several cases including 2-turbine, 3-turbine, 5-turbine, and 38-turbine cases.
Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Jennifer King, Eliot Quon, Christopher J. Bay, Rafael Mudafort, Nicholas Hamilton, Michael F. Howland, and Paul A. Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 555–570, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-555-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-555-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper a three-dimensional steady-state solver for flow through a wind farm is developed and validated. The computational cost of the solver is on the order of seconds for large wind farms. The model is validated using high-fidelity simulations and SCADA.
Peter Brugger, Mithu Debnath, Andrew Scholbrock, Paul Fleming, Patrick Moriarty, Eric Simley, David Jager, Jason Roadman, Mark Murphy, Haohua Zong, and Fernando Porté-Agel
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1253–1272, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1253-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1253-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A wind turbine can actively influence its wake by turning the rotor out of the wind direction to deflect the wake away from a downstream wind turbine. This technique was tested in a field experiment at a wind farm, where the inflow and wake were monitored with remote-sensing instruments for the wind speed. The behaviour of the wake deflection agrees with the predictions of two analytical models, and a bias of the wind direction perceived by the yawed wind turbine led to suboptimal power gains.
Patrick Murphy, Julie K. Lundquist, and Paul Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1169–1190, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1169-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1169-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present and evaluate an improved method for predicting wind turbine power production based on measurements of the wind speed and direction profile across the rotor disk for a wind turbine in complex terrain. By comparing predictions to actual power production from a utility-scale wind turbine, we show this method is more accurate than methods based on hub-height wind speed or surface-based atmospheric characterization.
Cited articles
Adaramola, M. and Krogstad, P.-Å.: Experimental investigation of wake
effects on wind turbine performance, Renew. Energy, 36, 2078–2086, 2011. a
Administration, U. E. I.: Electric power monthly with data for April 2021,
Table ES1.A, Tech. rep., US Department of Energy, https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/ (last access: 28 March 2022), 2021a. a
Administration, U. E. I.: Monthly energy review, Table 7.2a, Tech. Rep. DOE/EIA-0035 (2021/6), Office of Energy Statistics, US Department of Energy, https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/archive/00352106.pdf (last access: 28 March 2022), 2021b. a
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Experimental and theoretical study of
wind turbine wakes in yawed conditions, J. Fluid Mech., 806, 506–541, 2016. a
Crespo, A., Herna, J., Crespo, A., and Hernandez, J.: Turbulence characteristics in wind-turbine wakes, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 61, 71–85, 1996. a
Damiani, R., Dana, S., Annoni, J., Fleming, P., Roadman, J., van Dam, J., and Dykes, K.: Assessment of wind turbine component loads under yaw-offset conditions, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 173–189, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-173-2018, 2018. a
Doekemeijer, B. M., van der Hoek, D., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Closed-loop
model-based wind farm control using FLORIS under time-varying inflow
conditions, Renew. Energy, 156, 719–730, 2020. a
Dou, B., Qu, T., Lei, L., and Zeng, P.: Optimization of wind turbine yaw angles in a wind farm using a three-dimensional yawed wake model, Energy, 209, 118415, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118415, 2020. a, b
Fleming, P., Churchfield, M., Scholbrock, A., Clifton, A., Schreck, S.,
Johnson, K., Wright, A., Gebraad, P., Annoni, J., Naughton, B., and Berg, J.: Detailed field test of yaw-based wake steering, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 753, 052003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/5/052003, 2016a. a
Fleming, P., Annoni, J., Shah, J. J., Wang, L., Ananthan, S., Zhang, Z., Hutchings, K., Wang, P., Chen, W., and Chen, L.: Field test of wake steering at an offshore wind farm, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 229–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-229-2017, 2017. a
Fleming, P., King, J., Dykes, K., Simley, E., Roadman, J., Scholbrock, A., Murphy, P., Lundquist, J. K., Moriarty, P., Fleming, K., van Dam, J., Bay, C., Mudafort, R., Lopez, H., Skopek, J., Scott, M., Ryan, B., Guernsey, C., and Brake, D.: Initial results from a field campaign of wake steering applied at a commercial wind farm – Part 1, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 273–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-273-2019, 2019. a
Gebraad, P. M., Teeuwisse, F., van Wingerden, J.-W., Fleming, P. A., Ruben, S. D., Marden, J. R., and Pao, L. Y.: A data-driven model for wind plant
power optimization by yaw control, in: IEEE 2014 American Control Conference,
4–6 June 2014, Portland, OR, USA, 3128–3134, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2014.6859118, 2014. a, b
Gebraad, P. M., Teeuwisse, F., Van Wingerden, J., Fleming, P. A., Ruben, S.,
Marden, J., and Pao, L.: Wind plant power optimization through yaw control
using a parametric model for wake effects – a CFD simulation study, Wind
Energy, 19, 95–114, 2016. a
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Saunders, M. A.: SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for
large-scale constrained optimization, SIAM Rev., 47, 99–131, 2005. a
Grady, S., Hussaini, M., and Abdullah, M. M.: Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms, Renew. Energy, 30, 259–270, 2005. a
Howland, M. F., Bossuyt, J., Martínez-Tossas, L. A., Meyers, J., and
Meneveau, C.: Wake structure in actuator disk models of wind turbines in yaw
under uniform inflow conditions, J. Renew. Sustain. Energ., 8, 043301, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4955091 2016. a
Jensen, N. O.: A note on wind generator interaction, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.456.4080&rep=rep1&type=pdf
(last access: 28 March 2022), 1983. a
Kanev, S.: Dynamic wake steering and its impact on wind farm power production
and yaw actuator duty, Renew. Energy, 146, 9–15, 2020. a
Katic, I., Højstrup, J., and Jensen, N. O.: A simple model for cluster
efficiency, in: vol. 1, European wind energy association conference and exhibition, A. Raguzzi, Rome, Italy, 407–410, https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/106427419/A_Simple_Model_for_Cluster_Efficiency_EWEC_86_.pdf
(last access: 28 March 2022), 1986. a
King, J., Fleming, P., King, R., Martínez-Tossas, L. A., Bay, C. J., Mudafort, R., and Simley, E.: Control-oriented model for secondary effects of wake steering, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 701–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-701-2021, 2021. a
Kragh, K. A. and Hansen, M. H.: Load alleviation of wind turbines by yaw
misalignment, Wind Energy, 17, 971–982, 2014. a
Lin, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Power Maximization and Fatigue-Load Mitigation in a Wind-turbine Array by Active Yaw Control: an LES Study, J.
Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 042036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/4/042036, 2020. a
Lyu, Z., Xu, Z., and Martins, J.: Benchmarking optimization algorithms for wing aerodynamic design optimization, in: vol. 11,Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, https://mdolab.engin.umich.edu/bibliography/Lyu2014f
(last access: 28 March 2022), 2014. a
Marmidis, G., Lazarou, S., and Pyrgioti, E.: Optimal placement of wind turbines in a wind park using Monte Carlo simulation, Renew. Energy, 33,
1455–1460, 2008. a
Mosetti, G., Poloni, C., and Diviacco, B.: Optimization of wind turbine
positioning in large windfarms by means of a genetic algorithm, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 51, 105–116, 1994. a
National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Floris, GitHub [code], https://github.com/NREL/floris/releases/tag/v2.4, last access: 29 March 2022. a
Ning, A. and Petch, D.: Integrated design of downwind land-based wind turbines using analytic gradients, Wind Energy, 19, 2137–2152, 2016. a
NREL: FLORIS, Version 2.4, GitHub, https://github.com/NREL/floris/releases/tag/v2.4 (last access: 28 March 2022), 2021. a
Park, J., Kwon, S., and Law, K. H.: Wind farm power maximization based on a
cooperative static game approach, in: vol. 8688, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2013, International Society for Optics and Photonics, p. 86880R, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2009618, 2013. a
Quick, J., King, J., King, R. N., Hamlington, P. E., and Dykes, K.: Wake steering optimization under uncertainty, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 413–426, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-413-2020, 2020. a, b
Rios, L. M. and Sahinidis, N. V.: Derivative-free optimization: a review of
algorithms and comparison of software implementations, J. Global Optimiz., 56, 1247–1293, 2013. a
Simley, E., Fleming, P., and King, J.: Design and analysis of a wake steering controller with wind direction variability, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 451–468, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-451-2020, 2020. a
Simley, E., Fleming, P., Girard, N., Alloin, L., Godefroy, E., and Duc, T.: Results from a wake-steering experiment at a commercial wind plant: investigating the wind speed dependence of wake-steering performance, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1427–1453, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1427-2021, 2021. a
Stanley, A. P. J.: stanley2021-yaw-optimimization, Zenodo [data set and code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6395099, 2022. a
Stanley, A. P. J. and Ning, A.: Coupled wind turbine design and layout optimization with nonhomogeneous wind turbines, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 99–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-99-2019, 2019. a
Stokes, L. C. and Warshaw, C.: Renewable energy policy design and framing
influence public support in the United States, Nat. Energy, 2, 1–6, 2017. a
Thomas, J. J. and Ning, A.: A method for reducing multi-modality in the wind
farm layout optimization problem, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 042012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/4/042012, 2018.
a
Thomas, J. J., Gebraad, P. M., and Ning, A.: Improving the FLORIS wind plant
model for compatibility with gradient-based optimization, Wind Eng., 41, 313–329, 2017. a
Wiser, R., Rand, J., Seel, J., Beiter, P., Baker, E., Lantz, E., and Gilman,
P.: Expert elicitation survey predicts 37 % to 49 % declines in wind energy costs by 2050, Nat. Energy, 6, 555–565, 2021. a
Wu, N., Kenway, G., Mader, C. A., Jasa, J., and Martins, J. R.: pyOptSparse: A Python framework for large-scale constrained nonlinear optimization of sparse systems, J. Open Source Softw., 5, 2564, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02564, 2020. a
Wu, N., Kenwa, G., Mader, C. A., Jasa, J., and Martins, J. R. R. A.:
Pyoptsparse, GitHub [code],
https://github.com/mdolab/pyoptsparse, last access: 29 March 2022. a
Zingg, D. W., Nemec, M., and Pulliam, T. H.: A comparative evaluation of
genetic and gradient-based algorithms applied to aerodynamic optimization,
Eur. J. Comput. Mech./Revue Européenne de Mécanique Numérique, 17, 103–126, 2008. a
Short summary
In wind plants, turbines can be yawed to steer their wakes away from downstream turbines and achieve an increase in plant power. The yaw angles become expensive to solve for in large farms. This paper presents a new method to solve for the optimal turbine yaw angles in a wind plant. The yaw angles are defined as Boolean variables – each turbine is either yawed or nonyawed. With this formulation, most of the gains from wake steering can be reached with a large reduction in computational expense.
In wind plants, turbines can be yawed to steer their wakes away from downstream turbines and...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint