Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1689–1703, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1689-2020
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1689–1703, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1689-2020
Research article
07 Dec 2020
Research article | 07 Dec 2020

Global trends in the performance of large wind farms based on high-fidelity simulations

Søren Juhl Andersen et al.

Related authors

Predictive and Stochastic Reduced Order Modelling of Wind Turbine Wake Dynamics
Søren Juhl Andersen and Juan Pablo Murcia Leon
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-45,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-45, 2022
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Brief communication: How does complex terrain change the power curve of a wind turbine?
Niels Troldborg, Søren Juhl Andersen, Emily Louise Hodgson, and Alexander Meyer Forsting
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-30,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-30, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
FarmConners Wind Farm Flow Control Benchmark: Blind Test Results
Tuhfe Göçmen, Filippo Campagnolo, Thomas Duc, Irene Eguinoa, Søren Juhl Andersen, Vlaho Petrović, Lejla Imširović, Robert Braunbehrens, Ju Feng, Jaime Liew, Mads Baungaard, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Guowei Qian, Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, Rubén González-Lope, Vinit Dighe, Marcus Becker, Maarten van den Broek, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, Adam Stock, Matthew Cole, Renzo Ruisi, Ervin Bossanyi, Niklas Requate, Simon Strnad, Jonas Schmidt, Lukas Vollmer, Frédéric Blondel, Ishaan Sood, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-5,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-5, 2022
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Statistical impact of wind-speed ramp events on turbines, via observations and coupled fluid-dynamic and aeroelastic simulations
Mark Kelly, Søren Juhl Andersen, and Ásta Hannesdóttir
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1227–1245, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1227-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1227-2021, 2021
Short summary
Analytical model for the power–yaw sensitivity of wind turbines operating in full wake
Jaime Liew, Albert M. Urbán, and Søren Juhl Andersen
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 427–437, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-427-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-427-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Wind and turbulence
Evaluation of obstacle modelling approaches for resource assessment and small wind turbine siting: case study in the northern Netherlands
Caleb Phillips, Lindsay M. Sheridan, Patrick Conry, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Dmitry Duplyakin, Sagi Zisman, Nicolas Duboc, Matt Nelson, Rao Kotamarthi, Rod Linn, Marc Broersma, Timo Spijkerboer, and Heidi Tinnesand
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing and validating intra-farm and farm-to-farm wakes across different mesoscale and high-resolution wake models
Jana Fischereit, Kurt Schaldemose Hansen, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, and Juan Pablo Murcia Leon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1069–1091, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022, 2022
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation of airborne wind energy farms
Thomas Haas, Jochem De Schutter, Moritz Diehl, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1093–1135, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1093-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Investigation into boundary layer transition using wall-resolved large-eddy simulations and modeled inflow turbulence
Brandon Arthur Lobo, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, and Michael Breuer
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 967–990, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-967-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-967-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of the global-blockage effect on power performance through simulations and measurements
Alessandro Sebastiani, Alfredo Peña, Niels Troldborg, and Alexander Meyer Forsting
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 875–886, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-875-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-875-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Aagaard Madsen, H., Bak, C., Schmidt Paulsen, U., Gaunaa, M., Fuglsang, P., Romblad, J., Olesen, N., Enevoldsen, P., Laursen, J., and Jensen, L.: The DAN-AERO MW Experiments, Denmark, Forskningscenter Risø. Risø-R, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Risø Nationallaboratoriet for Bæredygtig Energi, Risø, Denmark, 2010. a
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Large eddy simulation of a large wind-turbine array in a conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer, Phys. Fluids, 27, 065108, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922339, 2015. a
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Gravity Waves and wind-farm efficiency in neutral and stable conditions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 166, 269–299, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0307-5, 2018. a
Andersen, S., Sørensen, J., Ivanell, S., and Mikkelsen, R.: Comparison of engineering wake models with CFD simulations, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 524, 012161, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012161, 2014. a
Andersen, S., Witha, B., Breton, S.-P., Sørensen, J., Mikkelsen, R., and Ivanell, S.: Quantifying variability of Large Eddy Simulations of very large wind farms, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 625, 012027, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012027, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f
Download
Short summary
The complexity of wind farm operation increases as the wind farms get larger and larger. Therefore, researchers from three universities have simulated numerous different large wind farms as part of an international benchmark. The study shows how simple engineering models can capture the general trends, but high-fidelity simulations are required in order to quantify the variability and uncertainty associated with power production of the wind farms and hence the potential profitability and risks.