Articles | Volume 8, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1625-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1625-2023
Research article
 | 
27 Oct 2023
Research article |  | 27 Oct 2023

Forced-motion simulations of vortex-induced vibrations of wind turbine blades – a study of sensitivities

Christian Grinderslev, Felix Houtin-Mongrolle, Niels Nørmark Sørensen, Georg Raimund Pirrung, Pim Jacobs, Aqeel Ahmed, and Bastien Duboc

Related authors

Progress in the validation of rotor aerodynamic codes using field data
Koen Boorsma, Gerard Schepers, Helge Aagard Madsen, Georg Pirrung, Niels Sørensen, Galih Bangga, Manfred Imiela, Christian Grinderslev, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Wen Zhong Shen, Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, Brandon Lobo, Frederic Blondel, Philippe Gilbert, Ronan Boisard, Leo Höning, Luca Greco, Claudio Testa, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Ganesh Vijayakumar
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Multiple limit cycle amplitudes in high-fidelity predictions of standstill wind turbine blade vibrations
Christian Grinderslev, Niels Nørmark Sørensen, Georg Raimund Pirrung, and Sergio González Horcas
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2201–2213, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2201-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2201-2022, 2022
Short summary
Wind turbines in atmospheric flow: fluid–structure interaction simulations with hybrid turbulence modeling
Christian Grinderslev, Niels Nørmark Sørensen, Sergio González Horcas, Niels Troldborg, and Frederik Zahle
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 627–643, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-627-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-627-2021, 2021
Short summary
Investigations of aerodynamic drag forces during structural blade testing using high-fidelity fluid–structure interaction
Christian Grinderslev, Federico Belloni, Sergio González Horcas, and Niels Nørmark Sørensen
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 543–560, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-543-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-543-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Fluid mechanics | Topic: Wind turbine aerodynamics
Going beyond BEM with BEM: an insight into dynamic inflow effects on floating wind turbines
Francesco Papi, Jason Jonkman, Amy Robertson, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1069–1088, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1069-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1069-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantifying the impact of modeling fidelity on different substructure concepts – Part 2: Code-to-code comparison in realistic environmental conditions
Francesco Papi, Giancarlo Troise, Robert Behrens de Luna, Joseph Saverin, Sebastian Perez-Becker, David Marten, Marie-Laure Ducasse, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 981–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-981-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-981-2024, 2024
Short summary
Wind turbine rotors in surge motion: new insights into unsteady aerodynamics of floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) from experiments and simulations
Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Umut Özinan, Po Wen Cheng, and Moustafa Abdel-Maksoud
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 665–695, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-665-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-665-2024, 2024
Short summary
An insight into the capability of the actuator line method to resolve tip vortices
Pier Francesco Melani, Omar Sherif Mohamed, Stefano Cioni, Francesco Balduzzi, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 601–622, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-601-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-601-2024, 2024
Short summary
Aerodynamic model comparison for an X-shaped vertical-axis wind turbine
Adhyanth Giri Ajay, Laurence Morgan, Yan Wu, David Bretos, Aurelio Cascales, Oscar Pires, and Carlos Ferreira
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 453–470, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-453-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-453-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bortolotti, P., Canet Tarrés, H., Dykes, K., Merz, K., Sethuraman, L., Verelst, D., and Zahle, F.: Systems Engineering in Wind Energy – WP2.1 Reference Wind Turbines, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1529216-iea-wind-tcp-task-systems-engineering-wind-energy-wp2-reference-wind-turbines (last access: 24 October 2023), 2019. a, b
CFX, A.: Modeling guide, Release 21R2, https://dl.cfdexperts.net/cfd_resources/Ansys_Documentation/CFX/Ansys_CFX-Solver_Modeling_Guide.pdf (last access: 24 October 2023), 2021. a, b
CFX-Solver, A.: Theory guide, Release 21R2, https://dl.cfdexperts.net/cfd_resources/Ansys_Documentation/CFX/Ansys_CFX-Solver_Theory_Guide.pdf (last access: 24 October 2023), 2021. a
DTU Computing Center: DTU Computing Center resources, https://doi.org/10.48714/DTU.HPC.0001, 2021.  a
Egorov, Y., Menter, F., Lechner, R., and Cokljat, D.: The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. part 2: Application to complex flows, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 85, 139–165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-010-9265-4, 2010. a, b
Download
Short summary
In standstill conditions wind turbines are at risk of vortex-induced vibrations (VIVs). VIVs can become large and lead to significant fatigue of the wind turbine structure over time. Thus it is important to have tools that can accurately compute this complex phenomenon. This paper studies the sensitivities to the chosen models of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations when modelling VIVs and finds that much care is needed when setting up simulations, especially for specific flow angles.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint