Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 237–244, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-237-2020
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 237–244, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-237-2020

Brief communication 14 Feb 2020

Brief communication | 14 Feb 2020

Brief communication: A double-Gaussian wake model

Johannes Schreiber et al.

Related authors

Wind inflow observation from load harmonics: initial steps towards a field validation
Marta Bertelè, Carlo L. Bottasso, and Johannes Schreiber
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 759–775, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-759-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-759-2021, 2021
Short summary
Field experiment for open-loop yaw-based wake steering at a commercial onshore wind farm in Italy
Bart M. Doekemeijer, Stefan Kern, Sivateja Maturu, Stoyan Kanev, Bastian Salbert, Johannes Schreiber, Filippo Campagnolo, Carlo L. Bottasso, Simone Schuler, Friedrich Wilts, Thomas Neumann, Giancarlo Potenza, Fabio Calabretta, Federico Fioretti, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 159–176, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-159-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Wind tunnel testing of wake steering with dynamic wind direction changes
Filippo Campagnolo, Robin Weber, Johannes Schreiber, and Carlo L. Bottasso
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1273–1295, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1273-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1273-2020, 2020
Short summary
Field testing of a local wind inflow estimator and wake detector
Johannes Schreiber, Carlo L. Bottasso, and Marta Bertelè
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 867–884, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-867-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-867-2020, 2020
Short summary
Improving wind farm flow models by learning from operational data
Johannes Schreiber, Carlo L. Bottasso, Bastian Salbert, and Filippo Campagnolo
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 647–673, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-647-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-647-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Aerodynamics and hydrodynamics
UNAFLOW: a holistic wind tunnel experiment about the aerodynamic response of floating wind turbines under imposed surge motion
Alessandro Fontanella, Ilmas Bayati, Robert Mikkelsen, Marco Belloli, and Alberto Zasso
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1169–1190, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1169-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1169-2021, 2021
Short summary
Vertical-axis wind-turbine computations using a 2D hybrid wake actuator-cylinder model
Edgar Martinez-Ojeda, Francisco Javier Solorio Ordaz, and Mihir Sen
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1061–1077, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1061-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1061-2021, 2021
Short summary
Maximal power per device area of a ducted turbine
Nojan Bagheri-Sadeghi, Brian T. Helenbrook, and Kenneth D. Visser
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1031–1041, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1031-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1031-2021, 2021
Short summary
How realistic are the wakes of scaled wind turbine models?
Chengyu Wang, Filippo Campagnolo, Helena Canet, Daniel J. Barreiro, and Carlo L. Bottasso
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 961–981, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-961-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-961-2021, 2021
Short summary
Response of the International Energy Agency (IEA) Wind 15 MW WindCrete and Activefloat floating wind turbines to wind and second-order waves
Mohammad Youssef Mahfouz, Climent Molins, Pau Trubat, Sergio Hernández, Fernando Vigara, Antonio Pegalajar-Jurado, Henrik Bredmose, and Mohammad Salari
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 867–883, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-867-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-867-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Bartl, J., Mühle, F., Schottler, J., Sætran, L., Peinke, J., Adaramola, M., and Hölling, M.: Wind tunnel experiments on wind turbine wakes in yaw: effects of inflow turbulence and shear, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 329–343, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-329-2018, 2018. a
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes, Renew. Energ., 70, 116–123, 2014. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Experimental and theoretical study of wind turbine wakes in yawed conditions, J. Fluid Mech., 806, 506–541, 2016. a, b, c
Boersma, S., Doekemeijer, B., Gebraad, P., Fleming, P., Annoni, J., Scholbrock, A., Frederik, J., and van Wingerden, J.: A tutorial on control-oriented modeling and control of wind farms, in: 2017 American Control Conference (ACC), Seattle, WA, USA, 24–26 May 2017, IEEE, 1–18, 2017. a
Campagnolo, F., Schreiber, J., Garcia, A. M., and Bottasso, C. L.: Wind Tunnel Validation of a Wind Observer for Wind Farm Control, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, San Francisco, California, USA, ISOPE-I-17-410, 2017.  a, b
Download
Short summary
An analytical wake model with a double-Gaussian velocity distribution is used to improve on a similar formulation by Keane et al (2016). The choice of a double-Gaussian shape function is motivated by the behavior of the near-wake region that is observed in numerical simulations and experimental measurements. The model is calibrated and validated using large eddy simulations replicating scaled wind turbine experiments, yielding improved results with respect to a classical single-Gaussian profile.