Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1137-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1137-2022
Research article
 | 
01 Jun 2022
Research article |  | 01 Jun 2022

FLOW Estimation and Rose Superposition (FLOWERS): an integral approach to engineering wake models

Michael J. LoCascio, Christopher J. Bay, Majid Bastankhah, Garrett E. Barter, Paul A. Fleming, and Luis A. Martínez-Tossas

Related authors

The value of wake steering wind farm flow control in US energy markets
Eric Simley, Dev Millstein, Seongeun Jeong, and Paul Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 219–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-219-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Load assessment of a wind farm considering negative and positive yaw misalignment for wake steering
Regis Thedin, Garrett Barter, Jason Jonkman, Rafael Mudafort, Christopher J. Bay, Kelsey Shaler, and Jasper Kreeft
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-6,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-6, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Implementation of a Near-Wake Region within the Curled-Wake Model
Paul Hulsman, Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Nicholas Hamilton, and Martin Kühn
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-112,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-112, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Enabling control co-design of the next generation of wind power plants
Andrew P. J. Stanley, Christopher J. Bay, and Paul Fleming
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1341–1350, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1341-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1341-2023, 2023
Short summary
A comparison of eight optimization methods applied to a wind farm layout optimization problem
Jared J. Thomas, Nicholas F. Baker, Paul Malisani, Erik Quaeghebeur, Sebastian Sanchez Perez-Moreno, John Jasa, Christopher Bay, Federico Tilli, David Bieniek, Nick Robinson, Andrew P. J. Stanley, Wesley Holt, and Andrew Ning
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 865–891, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-865-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-865-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Aerodynamics and hydrodynamics
High-Reynolds-number investigations on the ability of the full-scale e-TellTale sensor to detect flow separation on a wind turbine blade section
Antoine Soulier, Caroline Braud, Dimitri Voisin, and Frédéric Danbon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1043–1052, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1043-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1043-2022, 2022
Short summary
Experimental investigation of mini Gurney flaps in combination with vortex generators for improved wind turbine blade performance
Jörg Alber, Marinos Manolesos, Guido Weinzierl-Dlugosch, Johannes Fischer, Alexander Schönmeier, Christian Navid Nayeri, Christian Oliver Paschereit, Joachim Twele, Jens Fortmann, Pier Francesco Melani, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 943–965, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-943-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-943-2022, 2022
Short summary
Parked and operating load analysis in the aerodynamic design of multi-megawatt-scale floating vertical-axis wind turbines
Mohammad Sadman Sakib and D. Todd Griffith
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 677–696, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-677-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-677-2022, 2022
Short summary
High-Reynolds-number wind turbine blade equipped with root spoilers – Part 1: Unsteady aerodynamic analysis using URANS simulations
Thomas Potentier, Emmanuel Guilmineau, Arthur Finez, Colin Le Bourdat, and Caroline Braud
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 647–657, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-647-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-647-2022, 2022
Short summary
Local correlation-based transition models for high-Reynolds-number wind-turbine airfoils
Yong Su Jung, Ganesh Vijayakumar, Shreyas Ananthan, and James Baeder
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 603–622, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-603-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-603-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Barthelmie, R. J., Frandsen, S. T., Nielsen, M., Pryor, S., Rethore, P.-E., and Jørgensen, H. E.: Modelling and measurements of power losses and turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore wind farm, Wind Energy, 10, 517–528, 2007. a
Barthelmie, R. J., Hansen, K., Frandsen, S. T., Rathmann, O., Schepers, J., Schlez, W., Phillips, J., Rados, K., Zervos, A., Politis, E., and Chaviaropoulos, P. K.: Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms offshore, Wind Energy, 12, 431–444, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.348, 2009. a
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes, Renew. Energy, 70, 116–123, 2014. a, b
Draxl, C., Clifton, A., Hodge, B.-M., and McCaa, J.: The wind integration national dataset (wind) toolkit, Appl. Energy, 151, 355–366, 2015. a
Feng, J. and Shen, W. Z.: Solving the wind farm layout optimization problem using random search algorithm, Renew. Energy, 78, 182–192, 2015. a
Download
Short summary
This work introduces the FLOW Estimation and Rose Superposition (FLOWERS) wind turbine wake model. This model analytically integrates the wake over wind directions to provide a time-averaged flow field. This new formulation is used to perform layout optimization. The FLOWERS model provides a smooth flow field over an entire wind plant at fraction of the computational cost of the standard numerical integration approach.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint